ON
← Back to feed
Senate gives Seplat Energy, others 48-hour deadline
NG🏛️ PoliticsCenter11 days ago

Senate gives Seplat Energy, others 48-hour deadline

The Nigerian Senate has given Seplat Energy, Network E&P Nigeria Ltd, and several other oil companies a 48-hour deadline to appear before the Public Accounts Committee after they failed to attend an investigative hearing regarding audit queries from the Nigeria Extractive Industries Transparency Initiative (NEITI). The audit questions stem from reports covering the years 2021, 2022, and 2023. Chairman of the Senate committee, Abdul Ningi, criticized the companies' absence, emphasizing the Senate's constitutional authority to summon entities for explanations. One company claimed the Nigerian Upstream Petroleum Regulatory Commission (NUPRC) was its sole regulator, but the committee refuted this, asserting its legal power to require appearances. Meanwhile, Dubri Oil Company Ltd addressed claims of owing $3.25 million in royalties and gas flare liabilities, stating that the debt resulted from ongoing reconciliation efforts with NUPRC and that no outstanding balance remains.

The Senate Public Accounts Committee has given Seplat Energy and three other oil companies, Network E&P Nigeria Limited, All Grace Energy Limited, and Aradel Energy Limited, a 48-hour deadline to appear before the committee and respond to queries related to audit reports from the Nigeria Extractive Industries Transparency Initiative (NEITI). The ultimatum was issued on Tuesday following the companies' repeated failure to attend previous meetings. The committee, led by Senator Ibrahim Hassan Dankwambo, warned that non-compliance could result in the full invocation of the National Assembly's legislative powers. The audit reports cover the years 2021 through 2023 and focus on the management of oil and gas revenues, as well as compliance with financial obligations by companies operating in Nigeria’s extractive sector. The committee’s actions are part of its broader efforts to scrutinize potential revenue leakages and ensure transparency in the industry. The companies were summoned to address discrepancies highlighted in the NEITI reports, which have sparked controversy among stakeholders. Senator Abdul Ningi, who chairs the committee, expressed frustration over the companies’ absence during the recent investigative hearing in Abuja. He criticized a letter from one of the firms, which claimed accountability to the Nigerian Upstream Petroleum Regulatory Commission (NUPRC) rather than the Senate panel. Ningi emphasized that the National Assembly holds constitutional authority to summon entities for explanations on matters under investigation. He cited Sections 88 and 89 of the 1999 Constitution, which grant lawmakers the power to invite individuals, organizations, and government agencies to clarify public matters. In support of the committee’s stance, Senator Shehu Kaka Lawan, representing Borno Central, urged the panel to enforce its constitutional powers against the companies that have ignored repeated invitations. He stated that the managing directors of the affected firms must appear before the committee on Thursday or face consequences. Similar ultimatums were extended to the managing directors of All Grace Energy, Aradel Energy, and Seplat Energy, following their absence during the proceedings. The committee’s enforcement of these deadlines reflects growing tensions between the legislature and private sector players in the energy space. Companies have historically resisted such scrutiny, often citing regulatory jurisdictional disputes. For instance, Network E&P Nigeria Limited’s representative reportedly argued that the NUPRC, not the Senate, was responsible for overseeing the firm’s operations. This claim was dismissed by the committee as a misinterpretation of legal frameworks governing oversight. Meanwhile, another company, Dubri Oil Company Limited, faced its own challenge during the hearings. A representative of the firm, Soyode Clement, disputed a reported $3.025 million debt, comprising $2.378 million in gas flare liabilities and $646,605.55 in oil production-related obligations. Clement explained that the figures stemmed from unresolved reconciliation issues between Dubri Oil and the NUPRC at the time the NEITI report was compiled. He asserted that the reconciliation had since been completed, and no outstanding debt existed. Supporting documentation was submitted to the committee for further evaluation. The committee confirmed it would thoroughly examine the evidence before deciding whether to clear Dubri Oil of the liability outlined in the NEITI report. These proceedings underscore the ongoing scrutiny of the oil and gas sector, with lawmakers seeking greater accountability from both companies and regulatory bodies. As the deadline approaches, the outcome of these confrontations could set a precedent for future interactions between the legislature and the energy industry.

2 reports

Premium Times Nigeria logoPremium Times NigeriaIndependentCenterFactual 80Objective 8511 days ago
Senate gives Seplat Energy, others 48-hour deadline

The Nigerian Senate has given Seplat Energy, Network E&P Nigeria Ltd, and several other oil companies a 48-hour deadline to appear before the Public Accounts Committee after they failed to attend an investigative hearing regarding audit queries from the Nigeria Extractive Industries Transparency Initiative (NEITI). The audit questions stem from reports covering the years 2021, 2022, and 2023. Chairman of the Senate committee, Abdul Ningi, criticized the companies' absence, emphasizing the Senate's constitutional authority to summon entities for explanations. One company claimed the Nigerian Upstream Petroleum Regulatory Commission (NUPRC) was its sole regulator, but the committee refuted this, asserting its legal power to require appearances. Meanwhile, Dubri Oil Company Ltd addressed claims of owing $3.25 million in royalties and gas flare liabilities, stating that the debt resulted from ongoing reconciliation efforts with NUPRC and that no outstanding balance remains.

Bias read (Center): The article presents the Senate's actions and the responses from various companies without overtly favoring any side. It includes direct quotes from senators and company representatives, providing balanced perspectives on the situation. There is no evident editorializing or biased language that til츠

Why factuality (80): This article provides a clear and complete account of the Senate's action against the oil firms, citing the specific audit years and referencing the constitutionality of the Senate's actions. It matches the information from the first article and adds details about the regulatory stance of the compan

Why objectivity (85): The article maintains an objective tone, presenting the arguments of both the Senate and the companies without taking a clear stance. The language is formal and avoids emotive or biased phrasing.

The Punch logoThe PunchIndependentCenterFactual 75Objective 8011 days ago
Senate gives Seplat, three oil firms 48 hours to answer NEITI queries

The Nigerian Senate Public Accounts Committee has ordered four oil companies, Seplat Energy, Network E&P Nigeria Limited, All Grace Energy Limited, and Aradel Energy Limited, to respond within 48 hours to queries from the Nigeria Extractive Industries Transparency Initiative (NEITI) audit reports covering 2021–2023. The committee, led by Senator Ibrahim Hassan Dankwambo, expressed frustration over the companies' repeated failure to attend hearings. Senator Abdul Ningi criticized a letter from Network E&P Nigeria claiming accountability to the Nigerian Upstream Petroleum Regulatory Commission rather than the Senate, asserting that the National Assembly has constitutional authority to demand explanations. Other senators, including Shehu Kaka Lawan, supported invoking legislative powers against non-compliant entities. The committee emphasized that non-response could lead to enforcement actions under its authority.

Bias read (Center): The article presents a balanced account of the Senate committee's actions, quoting multiple senators with differing perspectives. While there is some emphasis on the constitutional authority of the National Assembly, the framing remains neutral, avoiding overt ideological slant. The focus is on the遵

Why factuality (75): The article accurately reports the Senate giving Seplat Energy and three other oil firms a 48-hour deadline to respond to NEITI audit queries. It mentions the names of the involved companies and quotes relevant senators, aligning with the cross-source consensus. However, it cuts off mid-sentence, ma

Why objectivity (80): The tone remains neutral, presenting both sides of the debate including the senators' positions. There is no evident bias or emotional language, maintaining a balanced perspective.

How each side covered it

The same event, grouped by the political lean of the outlets covering it.

How each side covered it

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Covered around the world

The same event as reported in other countries.

Covered around the world

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Claims check

Key factual claims, and how many sources assert vs dispute each.

Claims check

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Keep the news honest.

ObjectiveNews is reader-funded and ad-free — we show you the bias instead of hiding it. Support independent journalism for €4/month.

Become a Supporter

Related stories