United States🏛️ PoliticsProgressiveOverlooked by conservatives4 days ago
Sen. Susan Collins didn’t ‘cover up’ Epstein files or get $3 million from Epstein ‘business partner’
A political ad claims Senator Susan Collins, R-Maine, 'covered up' Jeffrey Epstein's files and received $3 million from Epstein's 'business partner.' The ad, run by the progressive super PAC WinSenate, alleges that Collins opposed transparency regarding Epstein's criminal activities and accepted funds from a donor linked to Epstein. However, PolitiFact investigated and found that while Collins did vote against releasing Epstein's files in a specific legislative move, she had previously supported similar provisions in other bills. Additionally, the ad references a $3 million contribution to Collins' super PAC, attributed to Stephen Schwarzman of Blackstone Group, who was a member of the same exclusive club as Epstein. Despite their shared membership, there is no evidence that Schwarzman and Epstein were business partners. The ad has been criticized for misleading claims about Collins' stance and the nature of the donor relationship.
Democratic attack ads in Maine's Senate race have drawn scrutiny for allegedly misleadingly linking Senator Susan Collins to Jeffrey Epstein, the late financier convicted of sex trafficking minors. The advertisements, produced by the Democratic super PAC WinSenate, assert that Collins voted to "cover up the Epstein files" and received $3 million from Epstein's business partner. These claims have sparked debate over the accuracy of the messaging used in the ongoing campaign. The controversy centers around a September 2025 vote in the Senate, where Collins, along with most Republicans, supported a motion to table an amendment aimed at compelling the release of Epstein-related documents. The amendment, introduced by Senate Democratic Leader Chuck Schumer, sought to direct the attorney general to disclose unclassified materials regarding Epstein and his associates. Collins argued at the time that the amendment was inappropriate for inclusion in the defense spending bill and suggested that a separate funding bill was a better venue for such a measure. Despite her opposition to the amendment, Collins later supported a different provision in a July 2025 funding bill that required the attorney general to retain, preserve, and compile Epstein-related records. This provision was part of a broader effort to address concerns surrounding the Epstein files. However, the funding bill faced delays before eventually passing through the Senate in November 2025. The ads also reference a $3 million contribution to Collins' super PAC from a man described as Epstein's business partner. The funds were donated by Stephen Schwarzman, CEO of the Blackstone Group, to the Pine Tree Results PAC, which supports Collins. However, Schwarzman has denied any business partnership with Epstein, emphasizing that while both were founding members of the Core Club in New York City, there is no evidence of a professional relationship between them. A spokesperson for WinSenate, Lauren French, claimed that being co-founders of the same exclusive club inherently implies a business partnership. However, multiple reputable sources, including The New York Times and The Wall Street Journal, have noted that Schwarzman and Epstein were merely members of the same club without any indication of a formal business association. The ads have been criticized for selectively highlighting Collins' past opposition to the amendment while omitting her subsequent support for a related measure. Additionally, the connection between Schwarzman and Epstein has been deemed tenuous, with no credible evidence suggesting a business partnership existed between the two men. Collins faces a challenging re-election bid against Democrat Troy Jackson, a former Maine state Senate president. The issue of the Epstein files has become a focal point in the campaign, with both sides presenting contrasting narratives about Collins' stance on the matter. As the election approaches, the accuracy of the claims made in the Democratic ads will likely remain under intense public and media scrutiny.
In the Maine Senate race, Democratic super PAC WinSenate ran misleading advertisements against Republican Senator Susan Collins, falsely linking her to Jeffrey Epstein. The ads claimed Collins 'covered up the Epstein files' and received $3 million from Epstein's business partner. However, Collins actually supported a bill requiring the Department of Justice to disclose Epstein-related records. The ad misrepresents her voting record, as she opposed an amendment to release the files but supported the broader bill. It also inaccurately connects her to Epstein-linked donors, while omitting context about a separate individual's financial ties to a club associated with Epstein. This is the third instance where Democratic ads have misrepresented Republican senators' votes on the Epstein files issue.
Bias read (Progressive): The article highlights Democratic campaign tactics that frame Republican senator Susan Collins in a negative light using misleading claims about her association with Epstein. The framing emphasizes the false connection between Collins and Epstein-linked donors, suggesting a deliberate attempt to mis
A political ad claims Senator Susan Collins, R-Maine, 'covered up' Jeffrey Epstein's files and received $3 million from Epstein's 'business partner.' The ad, run by the progressive super PAC WinSenate, alleges that Collins opposed transparency regarding Epstein's criminal activities and accepted funds from a donor linked to Epstein. However, PolitiFact investigated and found that while Collins did vote against releasing Epstein's files in a specific legislative move, she had previously supported similar provisions in other bills. Additionally, the ad references a $3 million contribution to Collins' super PAC, attributed to Stephen Schwarzman of Blackstone Group, who was a member of the same exclusive club as Epstein. Despite their shared membership, there is no evidence that Schwarzman and Epstein were business partners. The ad has been criticized for misleading claims about Collins' stance and the nature of the donor relationship.
Bias read (Progressive): The ad frames Senator Susan Collins in a negative light by suggesting she obstructed justice and accepted illicit funds, using emotionally charged language ('horrified,' 'rape') and selective emphasis on her voting record. While the article itself is fact-based, the ad's framing leans left by associ
How each side covered it
The same event, grouped by the political lean of the outlets covering it.
progressive
center
conservative
★
How each side covered it
Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.