Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.) has called on Democratic leaders to immediately ban super PACs from participating in Democratic primary elections, citing concerns over the influence of corporate-backed entities like the pro-Israel lobby American Israel Public Affairs Committee (AIPAC). In a letter sent to Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-N.Y.), House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries (D-N.Y.), and Democratic National Committee Chair Ken Martin, Sanders argued that allowing such groups to fund primary races creates a “corrupt system.” He specifically referenced AIPAC’s efforts to undermine Dr. Abdul El-Sayed (D-Mich.), a progressive candidate running for the Senate in Michigan, and warned that the same groups could later support Republican opponents in the general election. The controversy centers around the Michigan Democratic Senate primary, where El-Sayed narrowly defeated Rep. Haley Stevens (D-Mich.). AIPAC, which had previously supported Stevens, reportedly plans to spend tens of millions of dollars to back Republican candidate Mike Rogers in the November general election. According to Sanders, this strategy reflects a broader pattern in which outside groups, often funded by billionaires, spend heavily to shape the Democratic nomination process, even if it means supporting the opposing party in the final contest. “It is absurd that they spend tens of millions of dollars to try to determine who the Democratic nominee is and, if they fail, then proceed to support the Republican candidate in the general election,” he wrote. Sanders emphasized that the influence of super PACs undermines the integrity of the democratic process. He cited the Supreme Court’s 2010 Citizens United decision, which allowed unlimited independent expenditures by corporations and unions, as a key factor enabling this system. He urged Democratic leaders to take immediate action to prevent super PACs from influencing primary elections, arguing that the party must reclaim control over its internal processes. “The time to act is now,” he wrote. The situation has intensified tensions within the Democratic Party, particularly regarding foreign policy and support for Israel. El-Sayed, a Muslim physician and advocate for progressive policies, has faced criticism from some conservative lawmakers and pro-Israel groups for his stance on Israel’s actions in Gaza. He accused Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu of committing genocide against Palestinians, a claim that has drawn both praise and condemnation. AIPAC, which has historically played a major role in shaping Democratic Party priorities, has increasingly found itself at odds with progressive factions within the party, especially following the war in Gaza. El-Sayed himself has used the AIPAC issue to highlight perceived hypocrisy among some Democratic candidates. During a debate, he criticized Stevens for voting to approve $3.3 billion in aid to Israel, a measure that 100 House Democrats opposed. “That is the pro quo that comes with a quid of $30 million spent by AIPAC,” he said, drawing a direct link between campaign financing and policy positions. His comments underscore the growing concern among progressives that outside money influences not only the selection of nominees but also the platform and values of elected officials. AIPAC has responded to the loss of its preferred candidate by reaffirming its commitment to supporting pro-Israel candidates, both within and beyond the Democratic Party. The group stated that its members remain “determined to ensure that voters reject Dr. El-Sayed and his radical anti-Israel agenda in November.” It also praised the success of several pro-Israel candidates in recent primaries, including those in Kansas, Missouri, Virginia, and Washington. AIPAC argues that its work is essential to maintaining strong ties between the U.S. and Israel, a position that has gained traction among some moderate and conservative Democrats. Meanwhile, Sanders continues to push for systemic reform, including repealing Citizens United, expanding public funding for elections, and banning super PACs from primary contests. He has introduced legislation aimed at abolishing the influence of these entities, and his allies, including Rep. Summer Lee (D-Pa.), have joined him in advocating for such measures. Despite the challenges posed by the current political climate, Sanders maintains that the Democratic Party has the power to take decisive action within its own framework, even if broader legislative change remains distant. As the November general election approaches, the battle over campaign finance and the role of outside groups in shaping the Democratic nomination process appears set to intensify. Whether the party will heed Sanders’s call to ban super PACs from primaries remains uncertain, but the ongoing conflict highlights deepening divisions over the ethics and impact of modern political fundraising.
★
Keep the news honest.
ObjectiveNews is reader-funded and ad-free — we show you the bias instead of hiding it. Support independent journalism for €4/month.
Become a Supporter
United States
