ON
← Back to feed
Secret Plan to Dump Slaughterhouse Waste Blindsided Residents of Iowa’s Loess Hills
United States🏛️ PoliticsProgressiveyesterday

Secret Plan to Dump Slaughterhouse Waste Blindsided Residents of Iowa’s Loess Hills

A large waste storage site was secretly constructed near a historic cemetery in Castana, Iowa, raising concerns among local residents. The site, located within the protected Loess Hills landscape, was being used to store industrial byproduct waste from a pork processing plant in Sioux City. Local officials were unaware of the project until residents began complaining, leading to a town hall meeting where developers claimed they had communicated with state regulators. However, these communications occurred with central office staff rather than the regional DNR field office responsible for oversight in Monona County. The project operates under Iowa's current regulations, which do not require permits for certain levels of waste application.

A secret plan to construct a massive lagoon for storing slaughterhouse waste has sparked outrage among residents of Castana, Iowa, located within the scenic Loess Hills region. In a span of days, a dirt pit the size of five football fields emerged near the weathered headstones of Center Cemetery, catching locals off guard. This area, part of a 200-mile corridor of craggy bluffs and ridges along the Mississippi River valley, is renowned for its unique geological formations shaped by glacial deposits from the last Ice Age. Scott Koepsell, whose family owns farmland close to the site, described the situation as a mere rumor initially. However, the sudden appearance of the excavation site raised concerns among the community. On one day in late June, Alison Manz from the Iowa Department of Natural Resources' field office received four separate complaints regarding construction activities at the location. Unaware of any such project, Manz reached out to Hawthorn Land Holdings, the private equity group that owns the land. Brian Gallup of Hawthorn Land Holdings informed Manz that they were constructing a solid waste pit to store "industrial byproduct waste" from the Seaboard Triumph Foods pork processing facility in Sioux City, approximately 50 miles away. According to Iowa regulations, the waste would be used as fertilizer on nearby farmland at a rate below two tons per acre annually, which does not necessitate a permit. As tensions rose in Monona County, County Supervisor Bo Fox learned about the project through a concerned resident who lives adjacent to the site. He organized a town hall meeting on July 14th to discuss the issue, expressing frustration that neither the developer nor the Iowa DNR had informed the county about the project beforehand. During the meeting, Jay Layman, manager of Hawthorn Land Holdings, claimed that the project team had communicated with the Iowa Department of Natural Resources prior to starting construction. However, these communications were solely with staff at the central Des Moines office, not with the regional field office overseeing DNR permitting, inspections, and compliance in Monona County. It wasn't until residents filed complaints that the regional DNR field office became aware of the project. Layman also explained that the site would house DAFcake, the solid residue resulting from the dehydration of liquid hog manure during a process called "dissolved air flotation." Although Hawthorn Land Holdings did not disclose the source of the manure to local officials or residents, public records indicate a connection to Seaboard Triumph Foods, a major meatpacking plant owned by Seaboard Foods and Triumph Foods. Employing nearly 3,000 individuals, the facility is the largest employer in Sioux City, processing over 110,000 hogs weekly. Notes in the DNR's complaint database reveal that Gallup explicitly stated the project was for Seaboard Triumph Foods. Later, he inquired if their conversation was public record, indicating a desire to avoid mentioning Seaboard directly. Additionally, an employee of ProAg Engineering, the engineering firm advising on the project, sent Manz chemical analyses of the waste being considered for storage at the site. These analyses were conducted to assess potential environmental impacts. Residents remain anxious about the implications of this unannounced project, fearing possible contamination of groundwater and disruption of the delicate ecosystem in the Loess Hills. As discussions continue, the community awaits further information and assurances from both the developers and regulatory agencies.

Go to the primary sources (2)

The official sources this coverage is built on. Read them directly to bypass framing.

1 reports

Inside Climate News logoInside Climate NewsIndependentProgressiveFactual 68Objective 45yesterday
Secret Plan to Dump Slaughterhouse Waste Blindsided Residents of Iowa’s Loess Hills

A large waste storage site was secretly constructed near a historic cemetery in Castana, Iowa, raising concerns among local residents. The site, located within the protected Loess Hills landscape, was being used to store industrial byproduct waste from a pork processing plant in Sioux City. Local officials were unaware of the project until residents began complaining, leading to a town hall meeting where developers claimed they had communicated with state regulators. However, these communications occurred with central office staff rather than the regional DNR field office responsible for oversight in Monona County. The project operates under Iowa's current regulations, which do not require permits for certain levels of waste application.

Bias read (Progressive): The article frames the issue as a violation of environmental protections and highlights the lack of transparency and regulatory oversight. It emphasizes community concern and the failure of local authorities to be informed, suggesting a systemic issue with how such projects are managed. The focus on

Why factuality (68): The article reports on a specific incident involving a dirt pit near Center Cemetery in Castana, Iowa, and references DNR records regarding a private developer's plans. It cites direct quotes from DNR officials and provides details about the proposed use of waste as fertilizer under current regulati

Why objectivity (45): The article presents the situation in a highly emotive and alarming tone, using phrases like 'secret plan,' 'blindsided residents,' and 'dirt pit the size of five football fields.' This suggests a narrative that emphasizes the negative impact on the community and environment, potentially influencing

How each side covered it

The same event, grouped by the political lean of the outlets covering it.

How each side covered it

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Covered around the world

The same event as reported in other countries.

Covered around the world

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Claims check

Key factual claims, and how many sources assert vs dispute each.

Claims check

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Keep the news honest.

ObjectiveNews is reader-funded and ad-free — we show you the bias instead of hiding it. Support independent journalism for €4/month.

Become a Supporter

Related stories