Search More Than 500 Cases of U.S. Citizens Detained by Immigration Agents
ProPublica has compiled data from more than 500 cases involving U.S. citizens who were detained by federal immigration agents between 2025 and 2026. The report highlights specific incidents across multiple states where citizens were subjected to physical force, prolonged detention, or mistaken identity errors. Notable examples include a cyclist in Long Beach, California, who was tased after a collision with an ICE vehicle, and a mother of four in Lafayette, Louisiana, who was held in a detention facility despite having legal representation. In other cases, such as those in Evanston, Illinois, and Annapolis, Maryland, citizens reported injuries or extended holding periods without immediate access to counsel or phones. Federal Department of Homeland Security (DHS) responses to these incidents often cited non-cooperation with lawful commands or the need to verify identity, while local police and independent witnesses frequently contradicted official narratives regarding the use of force or the initial basis for detention.
U.S. citizens are reporting increasing instances of detention, injury, and wrongful arrest by Immigration and Customs Enforcement agents, according to a review of more than 500 cases. These incidents span multiple states, including California, Illinois, Maryland, New Jersey, Pennsylvania, Louisiana, and Texas. The documented cases reveal a pattern of agents detaining individuals who possess valid citizenship, often resulting in physical harm, prolonged holding periods, or forced deportation. In Long Beach, California, a citizen riding a bicycle collided with an ICE vehicle. Video footage indicates the ICE vehicle was traveling the wrong way down a one-way street before swerving toward the cyclist. The citizen was tased, injured, and handcuffed following the collision. The Department of Homeland Affairs denied striking the individual and alleged the citizen smashed the vehicle’s side mirror, a claim not supported by available video evidence. In Ventura, California, a citizen documenting ICE operations was tackled and tased while already pinned to the ground. Another citizen was detained in Santa Maria, California, while separate detentions occurred in Newark, New Jersey, and Robinson Township, Pennsylvania. In Evanston, Illinois, an ICE team detained a citizen who matched the description of a person they were seeking. A responding Evanston police officer stated that one agent had blood on his hands and that the citizen was transported to a hospital. DHS officials asserted the man failed to comply with lawful commands and was held until he identified himself. In Annapolis, Maryland, a citizen leaving a coffee shop was handcuffed, denied a phone call, and held for nearly two hours. DHS explained that the agency moved the individual to another location for an interview because agitators had gathered nearby. In the Bronx, New York, Jeury Concepcion, a 19-year-old citizen, was walking past a barbershop when three masked agents tackled him, mistaking him for another individual. Concepcion stated that agents released him far from his home with a bleeding head, though one agent apologized. DHS described the incident as a temporary detention to safely conclude questioning. In New Orleans, Louisiana, an immigration lawyer who is a U.S. citizen was detained and shackled while attempting to film the detention of her clients. In Lafayette, Louisiana, a mother of four was detained at a local law enforcement checkpoint outside her apartment. She was transferred to ICE custody and booked into a detention facility before her attorney secured her release. Both ICE and the local law enforcement agency continue to dispute her citizenship status. In Asbury Park, New Jersey, a citizen was accused of assaulting an officer during the arrest of her husband. She was held for eight hours in Delaney Hall, an ICE detention facility, before being released without known charges. Video recordings show her nine-year-old daughter and toddler left crying alone in a vehicle while ICE agents stood guard until family members arrived. In Fredericksburg, Texas, a 25-year-old citizen from Denver, Colorado, was detained and subsequently deported after a traffic stop. Unable to provide identification or proof of citizenship at the time, he was held for several days without access to a phone or legal counsel before agreeing to leave the country. He was permitted to re-enter the United States in August using his Colorado birth certificate. Separate developments highlight tensions between judicial officials and immigration enforcement. The Wisconsin Supreme Court initiated an investigation into former Milwaukee County Circuit Court Judge Hannah Dugan, a process that could lead to her disbarment. The probe follows a complaint filed in July by the Center to Advance Security in America, which requested Dugan’s removal from the bar. In December, a jury convicted Dugan of felony obstruction after she diverted ICE officers in April 2025. Authorities stated Dugan became visibly angry and called the situation absurd when ICE appeared at the courthouse. She directed officers to the chief judge’s chambers and instructed Eduardo Flores-Ruiz, who faced charges for battery, domestic abuse, and infliction of physical pain, to exit via a nonpublic jury door. ICE later apprehended Flores-Ruiz outside the building after a foot chase. Federal guidelines recommended a prison sentence of 15 to 21 months for Dugan, but she received a $5,000 fine and avoided incarceration. During her July sentencing, Dugan expressed hope to return to public service. Curtis Schube, director of research and policy at CASA, stated that Dugan’s actions rendered her unfit to serve as a judge or attorney. He noted that hindering ICE enforcement is comparable to obstructing police or FBI investigations. CASA argued that Dugan displayed no remorse for her conduct. In Ingram, Texas, a community of approximately 1,900 residents, local police integrated with ICE under a program revitalized by President Donald Trump in January 2025. This initiative deputizes local officers as deportation agents, with over 29,000 officers nationwide participating. Ingram, which is 45 percent Latino, saw its police department facilitate the deportation of roughly 10 percent of the town’s population within a year. Officer Jaron Alexander, who suggested the partnership to his chief, navigated these duties while grappling with personal and professional fallout. A 185-page internal investigation revealed Alexander had an affair prior to his divorce and used a county vehicle for the purpose, lying about the incident. Alexander’s interactions with resident Joanna Martinez illustrate the strain on local relationships. Their first encounter occurred in early October during a noise complaint check at a family baptism celebration. Alexander found no violations and departed. Subsequent encounters included pulling over Martinez’s work truck and her cousin, both of whom were handed to immigration agents. Alexander also stopped Martinez near her due date, warning her about illegal window tint. Despite these conflicts, Alexander stated he did not intend to target neighbors but incorporated the role into his existing duties. The integration of federal immigration enforcement into small-town policing has fractured communities, creating lasting divisions between law enforcement and the populations they serve.
Go to the primary sources (2)
The official sources this coverage is built on. Read them directly to bypass framing.
ProPublica has compiled data from more than 500 cases involving U.S. citizens who were detained by federal immigration agents between 2025 and 2026. The report highlights specific incidents across multiple states where citizens were subjected to physical force, prolonged detention, or mistaken identity errors. Notable examples include a cyclist in Long Beach, California, who was tased after a collision with an ICE vehicle, and a mother of four in Lafayette, Louisiana, who was held in a detention facility despite having legal representation. In other cases, such as those in Evanston, Illinois, and Annapolis, Maryland, citizens reported injuries or extended holding periods without immediate access to counsel or phones. Federal Department of Homeland Security (DHS) responses to these incidents often cited non-cooperation with lawful commands or the need to verify identity, while local police and independent witnesses frequently contradicted official narratives regarding the use of force or the initial basis for detention.
Bias read (Progressive): The article frames the subject through a critical lens of executive overreach and civil rights violations. It juxtaposes graphic accounts of physical harm and procedural failures against sanitized official justifications, emphasizing the vulnerability of citizens rather than national security needs.
Why factuality (90): This piece aggregates multiple distinct incidents involving U.S. citizens detained by ICE. Each claim is supported by specific media sources (NYT, CBS, etc.), providing high verifiability. The facts presented align with widely reported events, though the selection of cases inherently focuses on nega
Why objectivity (60): While the individual facts are sourced, the compilation itself presents a one-sided narrative focusing exclusively on alleged abuses or errors by ICE. There is no counter-narrative or context regarding successful operations, creating a biased impression despite the factual accuracy of the listed inc
The Daily WireIndependentConservativeFactual 85Objective 40
The Wisconsin Supreme Court has initiated an investigation into former Milwaukee County Circuit Court Judge Hannah Dugan, potentially leading to her disbarment, following a complaint filed by the Center to Advance Security in America (CASA). In April 2025, Dugan was convicted of felony obstruction for directing an individual with a criminal history, identified in the report as an illegal immigrant, through a nonpublic 'jury door' to avoid detection by Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) officers. Although federal guidelines recommended a prison sentence of 15 to 21 months, Dugan received a $5,000 fine during her July sentencing, where she expressed hope for returning to public service. CASA argues that this penalty does not reflect full accountability, emphasizing that obstructing federal immigration enforcement is equivalent to hindering other major law enforcement investigations. The court's probe follows Dugan's visible anger at the presence of ICE agents and her characterization of the situation as absurd.
Bias read (Conservative): The article frames the judicial misconduct primarily through the lens of immigration enforcement and national security, using terms like 'illegal immigrant' and equating obstruction of ICE with obstruction of the FBI. It highlights the disparity between the recommended prison sentence and the actual
Why factuality (85): The article accurately reflects the specific legal proceedings regarding Judge Hannah Dugan, citing correct dates, charges, and outcomes based on the provided text. However, it relies on a single primary source (The Daily Wire) and lacks independent corroboration for details like the 'foot chase' or
Why objectivity (40): The tone is highly partisan and emotionally charged. Phrases like 'EXCLUSIVE', 'shockingly', and the framing of the judge's actions as helping an 'illegal immigrant evade capture' reflect a strong ideological stance rather than neutral reporting.
This investigative report examines the social impact of a partnership between the Ingram, Texas, police department and U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE). Following the revival of a federal program in January 2025 that allows local law enforcement to act as deportation officers, Ingram joined the initiative while still recovering from a major flood. The article focuses on Officer Jaron Alexander, who proposed the collaboration to his chief and now navigates the personal conflicts arising from enforcing immigration laws against neighbors. Despite the town having fewer than 2,000 residents, local police have facilitated the removal of individuals representing approximately 10% of the population. The narrative highlights specific incidents where Alexander interacted with the Martinez family, including detaining relatives and warning a pregnant resident about vehicle violations, illustrating how the policy has fractured community trust and divided families.
Bias read (Progressive): The article frames the implementation of the ICE cooperation program as a negative development that 'tore the town apart' and 'roiled' the community. By centering the human cost on the detained residents and describing the officer's actions as causing daily grappling with severe consequences, the报道
Why factuality (80): The article provides detailed, human-interest reporting on the implementation of the 287(g) program in Ingram, Texas. Specific details like the population size and the officer's name are likely accurate based on local records, but the broader statistical claim ('equivalent of 10% of the town') requi
Why objectivity (50): The writing style is literary and empathetic, focusing on the personal toll on residents. While not explicitly inflammatory, the framing emphasizes the social disruption and tension caused by the program, presenting a perspective that leans towards criticism of the policy's impact on the community.
The New York Times (US)Independent🔒ProgressiveFactual: no official source document/info detectedObjective 45
The article reports that in states such as Florida, local law enforcement officers responsible for issuing fishing citations and inspecting agricultural produce have been granted authority by Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE). This expansion of powers allows these officers to participate in federal immigration enforcement activities. The move is described as broadening the scope of President Trump’s deportation initiatives by integrating local regulatory roles into federal immigration operations.
Bias read (Progressive): The headline uses emotionally charged phrasing ('Ended Up') to highlight the unexpected nature of the detention, implying a negative consequence for the individuals involved. The subhead explicitly frames the action as 'expanding the reach' of the president's campaign, which carries a critical tone.
Why factuality: no official source document/info detected
Why objectivity (45): The phrasing 'They Ended Up in ICE Detention' implies a causal link and potential injustice without providing the full legal context. The tone suggests a critique of the 'expanding reach' of the administration's policies, using language that frames the outcome negatively.
How each side covered it
The same event, grouped by the political lean of the outlets covering it.
progressive
center
conservative
★
How each side covered it
Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.
United States
