Frauke Brosius-Gersdorf, a constitutional law expert from Potsdam, has criticized parts of the Alternative for Germany (AfD) election program in Saxony-Anhalt as unconstitutional. The AfD, which could potentially form a government in the eastern German state following the upcoming September 6 election, proposed policies that Brosius-Gersdorf claims violate fundamental rights protected by the Basic Law. One such policy involves providing a welcome bonus for newborns, but only if at least one parent holds German citizenship. This provision, outlined under the heading “Introduce a Welcome Bonus for Children,” specifies that eligibility requires German citizenship from at least one parent and a fixed primary residence in Saxony-Anhalt for both parents for at least one year. Brosius-Gersdorf argued that the state must support families universally, regardless of their nationality or the citizenship status of their children. She emphasized that family life is protected by the constitution and that discrimination based on ancestry violates the dignity clause of the Basic Law. The AfD’s proposal, she claimed, breaches these protections by distinguishing between families with and without German citizenship. The AfD's election platform includes several other controversial proposals. It aims to introduce private security guards at schools, described by party vice-chairman Hans-Thomas Tillschneider as “black-clad, strict, and equipped with tear gas canisters.” While legal experts have noted that such measures are not explicitly prohibited by law, concerns remain over potential infiltration by far-right elements. Additionally, the AfD plans to end inclusive education for children with disabilities, a move that would contradict international agreements such as the United Nations Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities. Any attempt to implement this policy would likely face legal challenges, including from parents seeking to protect their children's right to inclusive schooling. If the AfD wins power in Saxony-Anhalt, it intends to dissolve the public broadcasting agreement known as the Rundfunkstaatsvertrag, which governs the operations of regional broadcasters like the MDR. This would allow the AfD to remove the MDR from its current role as a public service broadcaster. However, the dissolution of such contracts requires legislative approval, meaning the AfD would need a majority in the state parliament to enact this change. The MDR has already announced intentions to challenge any attempt to terminate its contract through legal means. Public broadcasting institutions in Germany, including the ARD, ZDF, and Deutschlandradio, operate under various state treaties that include provisions for termination and renewal. For example, the NDR’s contract allows for termination every five years, with automatic extension unless terminated within a specific timeframe. In contrast, the MDR’s contract permits exit at the end of each year, followed by a two-year notice period. This structure suggests that even if the AfD were to win control of the state legislature, implementing changes to the MDR’s status would require multiple electoral victories. Political alliances are also shaping up ahead of the election. Current coalition partners of the Christian Democratic Union (CDU) in Saxony-Anhalt, SPD and Free Democrats (FDP), have ruled out forming a coalition with the AfD or the Left Party. This decision underscores the political risks associated with aligning with parties deemed extremist by some observers. Meanwhile, recent polls indicate that the AfD leads with around 41 percent of voter support, significantly ahead of the CDU, which trails with 24 percent. The situation in Saxony-Anhalt highlights broader concerns regarding the influence of far-right politics in Germany. Legal scholars and civil society groups warn that the AfD’s proposals, while framed as populist reforms, pose serious threats to democratic principles and minority rights. As the election approaches, the focus shifts to how various stakeholders, including legal experts, media organizations, and opposition parties, will respond to the potential rise of the AfD in the region.
5 reports
CORRECTIVIndependentProgressiveFactual 90Objective 85yesterdayThe article discusses the potential policies of the AfD (Alternative for Germany) if they win the state election in Saxony-Anhalt, which is taking place on September 6th. The AfD leads opinion polls with around 40% support, making them the first far-right party potentially involved in forming a state government in Germany. The piece explores whether the AfD could implement their proposed measures, such as introducing security guards at schools who would be armed and dressed in black, and ending inclusive education. Legal experts Felix Wirth Hanschmann and Janos Richter analyze these proposals. They note that while legal barriers do not prevent the introduction of school security guards, there are concerns about the involvement of known far-right figures in such roles, which could lead to direct contact with students. Regarding inclusive education, the authors argue that ending it would violate international law under the UN Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities, and parents might challenge such decisions legally.
Bias read (Progressive): The article frames the AfD's proposals as problematic and legally questionable, emphasizing risks to student safety and constitutional rights. It highlights the potential violation of international law by ending inclusive education and raises concerns about the influence of far-right individuals in校
Why factuality (90): This article provides detailed analysis by legal experts on the feasibility of AfD proposals, including school security guards. It references specific statements from AfD officials and legal frameworks, offering a nuanced view based on expert opinion. The information is well-sourced and consistent w
Why objectivity (85): The article maintains a neutral tone, presenting both the AfD’s plans and the legal considerations surrounding them. It includes expert analysis without overt bias, resulting in a high objectivity score.
taz – die tageszeitungIndependentProgressiveFactual 85Objective 903 days agoThe article discusses concerns over the potential impact of an AfD-led government in Saxony-Anhalt on the state broadcasting contracts (Rundfunkstaatsverträge), particularly affecting the regional broadcaster MDR. It highlights that if the AfD wins, they could potentially terminate these contracts, leaving public broadcasters vulnerable. The article notes that unlike other broadcasters like the NDR, which has more secure contractual terms with longer renewal periods and extended notice periods, the MDR faces a more precarious situation with annual termination rights and a two-year notice period. The MDR has already announced legal action against any attempt to terminate its contract and plans to become more proactive in defending its existence.
Bias read (Progressive): The article frames the AfD’s potential actions as a threat to public broadcasting independence, using language that implies a risk to democratic institutions. While it presents factual information about the contractual terms, the emphasis on the vulnerability of the MDR under an AfD government and a
Why factuality (85): The article reports on the political stance of Schulze regarding coalition possibilities and preferred alliances. It accurately reflects his position and the current political landscape without introducing new or unverified claims, maintaining consistency with other sources.
Why objectivity (90): The article presents Schulze’s position objectively, without emotional language or biased framing. It remains focused on reporting the political stance rather than taking sides, resulting in a high objectivity score.
Der SpiegelIndependentProgressiveFactual 85Objective 70yesterdayThe article discusses concerns raised by constitutional law expert Frauke Brosius-Gersdorf regarding the AfD's election program in Saxony-Anhalt. The program proposes a 'welcome gift' for newborns, but only if at least one parent is German. Brosius-Gersdorf argues this constitutes a constitutional violation, as it discriminates based on parental nationality and violates fundamental rights including family protection and non-discrimination. She emphasizes that all families, regardless of origin, should be protected under the Basic Law. The AfD, labeled as right-wing extremist by the state's constitution protection office, aims for sole governance in Saxony-Anhalt, currently leading in polls.
Bias read (Progressive): The article frames the AfD's proposal as a constitutional violation, using legal terminology and emphasizing discrimination against non-German parents. It highlights the AfD's right-wing extremist label and its electoral ambitions, which aligns with a left-leaning critique of far-right policies. The
Why factuality (85): The article reports on Frauke Brosius-Gersdorf’s claim that parts of the AfD’s election program in Saxony-Anhalt violate the constitution, specifically regarding the 'welcome money' for newborns only if at least one parent is German. It cites her as a constitutional law expert and quotes her directl
Why objectivity (70): The tone leans slightly towards critical reporting, especially when discussing the AfD’s potential influence and the implications of their policies. The article presents the constitutional concern but does not provide balanced counterpoints from pro-AfD perspectives, leading to a lower objectivity s
Süddeutsche ZeitungIndependent🔒CenterFactual 80Objective 75yesterdayA recent survey indicates that 41 percent of voters in Saxony-Anhalt support the Alternative for Germany (AfD) party. This high level of support reflects growing concerns among the population regarding the region's economic and social challenges. The situation has become so tense that local politicians feel compelled to address these issues directly. The AfD's rising influence highlights broader anxieties about governance and future prospects in the area.
Bias read (Center): The article presents statistical data on voter support for the AfD without overtly favoring any particular perspective. It does not employ biased language or selectively omit context, maintaining a balanced approach by focusing on the reported figures and their implications.
Why factuality (80): The article discusses the AfD’s plan to terminate public broadcasting contracts and mentions the F.A.Z. headline. It refers to the legal requirements for such actions and the political context. While some details are speculative, the core facts align with reported positions, supporting a mid-range f
Why objectivity (75): The tone has a somewhat alarmist undertone, particularly in describing the consequences of an AfD government. There is less emphasis on alternative viewpoints or counterarguments, affecting objectivity.
Die WeltIndependent🔒CenterFactual 80Objective 754 days agoIn Saxony-Anhalt, state premier Matthias Schulze has rejected forming a coalition with the far-right Alternative for Germany (AfD) and the Left Party. The article highlights Schulze’s preference for alternative alliances, though specific details about his preferred partners are not provided. The decision reflects ongoing political tensions within the region, where coalition-building remains challenging due to ideological divides. Schulze’s stance underscores the difficulty of achieving stable governance amid polarized political landscapes.
Bias read (Center): The article presents Schulze’s rejection of a coalition without overtly criticizing or praising either the AfD or the Left Party. It focuses on the political implications of his decision rather than taking a clear ideological stance. While the subject is politically charged, the framing remains fact
Why factuality (80): This article focuses on local activism against far-right movements in Mecklenburg-Vorpommern, featuring a personal profile of an activist. While it provides context on the political climate and local efforts, it lacks detailed policy analysis or direct reference to the AfD’s broader agenda. The focu
Why objectivity (75): The article has a more narrative and emotional tone, emphasizing the activist’s personal background and dedication. While informative, it frames the issue through a human-interest lens, potentially influencing reader perception beyond pure neutrality.
★
Keep the news honest.
ObjectiveNews is reader-funded and ad-free — we show you the bias instead of hiding it. Support independent journalism for €5/month.
Become a Supporter
Germany
