ON
← Back to feed
AfD and BSW: How close are they to Russia?
Germany🏛️ PoliticsCenter6 days ago

AfD and BSW: How close are they to Russia?

The Alternative for Germany (AfD) and the Brandenburg Social Democrats (BSW) have jointly called for an immediate halt to German aid to Ukraine in the Saxony-Anhalt state parliament. This collaboration raises questions about their proximity to Russia, given both parties' controversial stances on foreign policy and their alignment with Russian interests. The move suggests a strategic alliance between these two parties on issues related to Germany's involvement in the Ukraine conflict. Their joint position reflects broader concerns about Germany's role in international affairs and could signal a shift in regional politics.

The state parliament of Saxony-Anhalt voted to demand the immediate cessation of all German financial and military aid to Ukraine. This resolution was passed during a special session with the combined votes of the far-right Alternative for Germany party and the newly elected Alliance for Social Justice and Economic Reason. Both parties urged the acting prime minister, Christian Democrat Sven Schulze, to advocate for peace negotiations with Russia within the Federal Council, which represents the sixteen German states. Although federal states lack specific authority over foreign policy, the motion carries no direct impact on national Ukraine strategy. The vote occurred against the backdrop of ongoing coalition talks following the September 2026 election. The AfD secured a clear victory with nearly forty-four percent of the vote but failed to achieve an absolute majority in the new legislature. Consequently, the party requires support from other groups to form a government. All other political parties refuse to cooperate with the AfD because security authorities have classified it as confirmed right-extremist. The Alliance for Social Justice and Economic Reason entered the Magdeburg parliament with just over five percent of the vote. It is currently the only party willing to engage in official discussions with the AfD. Critics from opposing factions condemned the move sharply. Stefan Ruland, a member of the Christian Democratic Union, described the proposal as shameful. He argued that demanding a ceasefire solely from the attacked party constitutes a demand for capitulation rather than peace. Ruland stated this approach reverses the roles of victim and perpetrator. Another critic, Mützenich, labeled the initiative shameless. Observers view the joint decision as a signal of long-term cooperation between two ideologically distinct groups. Political scientist Armin Pfahl-Traughber noted that their common ground includes rejecting the political elite, supporting Putin, and criticizing German aid to Ukraine. The Alliance split from the Left Party in 2024. Its founder, Sahra Wagenknecht, previously served as a prominent representative of the Communist Platform within the Left Party, a group known for its proximity to Russia. Her conservative social policies and criticism of migration eventually led to her departure and the creation of the new party. Sympathy for Vladimir Putin has been expressed repeatedly by AfD politicians. Björn Höcke, the influential party leader in Thuringia, called the Russian president a pioneer for a world of free and sovereign states in 2023. This statement came one year after Russia launched its offensive war against Ukraine. Relations between the two parties gained attention in early October 2026 when representatives met for a trust-building dinner in Saxony-Anhalt. The gathering was hosted by a right-extremist publishing house.

How this report was made. Objective News wrote this report from 2 source articles, using AI-assisted synthesis under our methodology. It is our own text, not a copy of any single outlet. Read our methodology.

Responsible editor: Matej BašaSpotted an error? Report it

2 reports

Deutsche Welle (Deutsch) logoDeutsche Welle (Deutsch)State / PublicConservativeFactual 94Objective 897 days ago
AfD and BSW: How close are they to Russia?

The Alternative for Germany (AfD) and the Brandenburg Social Democrats (BSW) have jointly called for an immediate halt to German aid to Ukraine in the Saxony-Anhalt state parliament. This collaboration raises questions about their proximity to Russia, given both parties' controversial stances on foreign policy and their alignment with Russian interests. The move suggests a strategic alliance between these two parties on issues related to Germany's involvement in the Ukraine conflict. Their joint position reflects broader concerns about Germany's role in international affairs and could signal a shift in regional politics.

Bias read (Conservative): The article highlights the cooperation between AfD and BSW on a highly contentious issue, stopping German support for Ukraine, which aligns with pro-Russian sentiments. The framing emphasizes their alignment with Russia, suggesting a right-leaning perspective by focusing on their shared stance against

Why factuality (94): The article accurately describes the motion passed by AfD and BSW in Saxony-Anhalt, the role of Sven Schulze, and the lack of direct impact on national policy. These points align closely with the cross-source consensus.

Why objectivity (89): While the article presents the events objectively, it includes quotes from opposing parties that may subtly frame the issue in a critical light. However, it avoids outright bias and sticks mostly to reported statements.

Die Welt logoDie WeltIndependent🔒ProgressiveFactual: no official source document/info detectedObjective 876 days ago
Shameless Mützenich criticizes Ukraine petition by AfD and BSW

The article discusses criticism by Mützenich towards an application related to Ukraine submitted by the AfD and BSW parties. The focus is on the political reaction to this proposal, highlighting the controversy surrounding the parties' stance on the issue. The content reflects the ongoing debate within German politics regarding foreign policy and national security concerns linked to Ukraine. The article emphasizes the strong disapproval expressed by Mützenich, indicating the sensitivity of the matter in current political discourse.

Bias read (Progressive): The article presents criticism from Mützenich, who is associated with left-leaning political views, against the AfD and BSW parties, which are typically seen as right-wing or populist. The framing of the critique suggests alignment with left-leaning perspectives on the issue.

Why factuality: no official source document/info detected

Why objectivity (87): The article uses emotionally charged language such as 'schamlos' (shameless), which introduces some subjectivity. However, it remains largely factual and avoids overt bias beyond the tone of the headline.

How each side covered it

The same event, grouped by the political lean of the outlets covering it.

How each side covered it

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Covered around the world

The same event as reported in other countries.

Covered around the world

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Claims check

Key factual claims, and how many sources assert vs dispute each.

Claims check

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Keep the news honest.

ObjectiveNews is reader-funded and ad-free — we show you the bias instead of hiding it. Support independent journalism for €4/month.

Become a Supporter

Related stories