Cambridge Analytica scandal: New Mexico has ordered Meta to pay it $25 billion

France 24 (English)State / PublicCenter8 hr. ago

A New Mexico judge has ordered Meta to pay $25 billion to the state following a jury verdict that the company deceived users regarding data privacy issues linked to the Cambridge Analytica scandal. This financial penalty follows a separate $18 billion settlement Meta reached with 48 other states over similar allegations. The legal dispute centers on the improper harvesting of personal data from millions of Facebook users via a third-party app, which was used for targeted political advertising during the 2016 US presidential election. Meta has characterized the ruling as a barrier to doing business in the state and intends to appeal the decision. New Mexico Attorney General Raul Torrez described the outcome as a historic victory for consumer protection. The ruling adds to a series of recent legal actions against Meta, including billions of dollars in settlements and fines related to the platform's impact on children.

Bias read (Center): The article presents a balanced account of a high-profile legal and regulatory action involving a major technology corporation and state government authorities. It includes direct quotes from both Meta, which defends itself by calling the fine a 'tax on speech,' and the New Mexico Attorney General,谁

France 24 (Français)State / PublicCenter9 hr. ago

Meta has been ordered by a New Mexico court to pay $25 billion for allegedly deceiving state residents regarding data privacy practices over a period exceeding ten years. The ruling follows a September 2025 jury verdict that found Facebook liable for approximately 44 million violations of the state's unfair trade practices law based on 26 misleading statements made between 2010 and 2021. Meta disputes the decision, characterizing the penalty as a tax on freedom of expression due to content moderation aspects of the case, and plans to appeal while acknowledging the financial burden represents one-eighth of its annual revenue. The fine includes interest and is intended to fund an education program, marking a significant legal precedent against major technology companies. This sanction adds to previous penalties Meta has faced, including a $5 billion federal fine related to the Cambridge Analytica scandal and settlements concerning minor safety.

Bias read (Center): The article presents a balanced overview of the legal outcome, citing both the state Attorney General's perspective on corporate accountability and Meta's defense regarding free speech and business viability. It provides specific financial figures and historical context without using emotionally-chi

LibérationIndependentCenter10 hr. ago

Meta Platforms has been ordered to pay a record fine of $25 billion by the state of New Mexico. The penalty stems from the Cambridge Analytica scandal, where the company allegedly misled residents regarding the usage of their personal data. This decision was issued on Wednesday, October 21. The ruling targets the parent company of social media services including Facebook, WhatsApp, and Instagram.

Bias read (Center): The article reports a legal and financial outcome involving a major technology corporation. While the underlying issue involves data privacy which has political dimensions, the specific report focuses on the corporate penalty and the legal judgment rather than partisan politics or electoral impact.

La CroixParty-alignedCenter11 hr. ago

A New Mexico judge ordered Meta to pay $25 billion in damages for deceiving state residents regarding their personal data, a ruling stemming from the Cambridge Analytica scandal. The state was the sole entity to litigate this specific case to judgment after other states settled similar claims for $459 million in August. A Santa Fe jury had previously found Facebook liable for approximately 44 million violations of state unfair trade practices laws, affecting all 2.1 million state residents. The judge justified the substantial penalty by citing the extraordinary number of deliberate infractions, their duration, and the intentional nature of the false statements. While the state sought between $35 and $40 billion and Meta argued for a cap of $3.45 billion, the final award includes interest that increases the total by $3.75 billion annually until paid. The funds are designated for a state education fund, and the judge has yet to rule on corrective measures such as data management audits.

Bias read (Center): The article presents a straightforward legal report on a court ruling involving a major technology corporation and a state government. It cites specific figures, quotes from both the state Attorney General and references to Meta's legal stance, and provides context on parallel settlements. There is,