SC closes suo motu case over NCERT textbook chapter on judiciary

Hindustan TimesIndependentCenter2 hr. ago

The Supreme Court of India closed a suo motu case regarding a controversial chapter in the NCERT Class 8 social science textbook that depicted corruption in the judiciary. The court noted that the chapter had been removed following revisions suggested by an expert panel appointed by the government. Solicitor General Tushar Mehta informed the court that updated textbooks with the revised content are now circulating. The court clarified that a previous statement by the solicitor general, suggesting that the curriculum had not been reviewed by committees, was merely his submission and not an official ruling. This clarification followed concerns raised by legal representatives of the academics involved, who feared the statement might be misinterpreted as a judicial finding. The court had previously addressed allegations that the academics had misrepresented facts about the judiciary and allowed entities receiving government funding to make independent decisions on the matter.

Bias read (Center): The article presents a balanced account of the legal proceedings involving the NCERT textbook controversy. It includes perspectives from both the government-appointed expert panel and the academic critics, without overtly favoring either side. The court's clarifications and the solicitor general's辩护

The PrintIndependentCenter3 hr. ago

The Supreme Court (SC) of India has closed a suo motu (on its own motion) case related to a chapter in the NCERT (National Council of Educational Research and Training) textbook that discusses the judiciary. The case was initiated by the court itself, likely due to concerns about the content of the chapter. The decision to close the case suggests that the court either found the matter resolved or determined there was insufficient basis for further action. The textbook chapter in question appears to have sparked controversy, possibly regarding its portrayal of judicial functions or independence.

Bias read (Center): The article reports on a legal decision made by the Supreme Court regarding educational content, which involves governance and public policy. There is no clear indication of ideological leaning in the framing of the story. The focus is on the procedural closure of a case rather than advocacy for any