BAThe article reports that citizens of Bihać are facing daily traffic congestion while the local government is spending public funds on road reconstruction projects in areas where roads are already in good condition. This has led to traffic collapse in the city, complicating the work of emergency services, police, and firefighters, and causing damage to tourism, hospitality, and the economy during peak tourist season. The SBB USK organization questions why asphalt is being removed in non-priority areas, why these works are happening at a time of maximum traffic congestion, and who will be held responsible for the consequences of such decisions. They emphasize that Bihać needs real projects and responsible management of public funds rather than pre-election superficial improvements and daily traffic chaos.
Bias read (Left): The article criticizes the government for misusing public funds on unnecessary infrastructure projects during a period of high traffic congestion, which negatively impacts essential services and the local economy. It frames the situation as a result of irresponsible governance and highlights the ine
Why these scores (Factual 85 · Objective 70): Factuality is high as the article reports on the SBB-USK statement regarding road reconstruction and traffic issues in Bihać. It aligns with cross-source consensus on the impact of these projects. Objectivity is lower due to the use of emotionally charged language like 'predizborna šminka' and the e
