Ship traffic through the Bab Al Mandeb strait plummeted to just 15 vessels on Sunday, marking a 56 percent decline compared to the 34 crossings recorded on July 20, when Houthi rebels first imposed a maritime embargo on Saudi-linked ships, according to Kpler data. This dramatic drop highlights the growing impact of the ongoing conflict in the region on global trade routes. Most of the remaining vessels were engaged in the exchange of goods such as crude oil, grain, and fertilizers destined for markets in China, India, Pakistan, and the Netherlands. The sharp decline in traffic follows a series of escalations by Yemen's Iran-backed Houthi rebels, who claimed responsibility for attacks on Saudi Aramco facilities in the cities of Jizan and Yanbu on Saturday. These incidents have intensified fears of a potential resurgence of hostilities in Yemen. On Friday, the Houthis also reportedly attacked the Saudi ship NCC Masa, resulting in minor damage. A separate incident involving an unknown projectile near a tanker in the southern Red Sea was reported by the UK Maritime Trade Operations, further underscoring the volatility of the area. Simultaneously, ship traffic through the Strait of Hormuz saw a notable increase, with nearly double the number of vessels crossing the critical waterway on Sunday. This uptick occurred after a temporary ceasefire between the United States and Iran, although recent skirmishes have led to fluctuations in traffic levels. Data indicates that 11 ships traversed the strait on Sunday, including 10 carrying crude oil or chemical products. Prior to the outbreak of hostilities between Iran and the US in February, over 100 ships passed through the strait daily, transporting approximately 20 million barrels of crude oil. Major shipping firms are increasingly steering clear of both the Bab Al Mandeb and the Strait of Hormuz due to the heightened risks. German company Hapag-Lloyd has stated that it is adjusting its routes and schedules to minimize exposure, with the majority of its services now rerouted via the Cape of Good Hope. A spokesperson for the company emphasized the firm's readiness to adapt to changing conditions, stating that teams are maintaining close communication with clients to ensure optimal solutions for their cargo. The situation in Yemen has also drawn attention to broader geopolitical dynamics. Analysts suggest that the Houthi actions may be influenced by Iran's Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps, aiming to exert additional pressure on the United States and its allies. The Houthis have rejected mediation efforts by Oman and Jordan, insisting on flights operated by Iran's Mahan Air between Tehran and Sanaa. This stance has placed Saudi Arabia and the internationally recognized Yemeni government in a precarious position, as they face the dilemma of either accepting the risk of Iranian involvement or seeking alternative arrangements. In response to the escalating tensions, Saudi Arabia has reiterated its commitment to supporting initiatives aimed at reopening Sanaa airport and restoring stability in Yemen. Ambassador Mohammed Al Jaber emphasized the kingdom's dedication to facilitating the entry of ships into Hodeidah ports to meet the needs of the Yemeni population. Despite these efforts, the conflict continues to pose significant challenges to regional stability and global energy markets, with oil prices fluctuating due to concerns over supply disruptions.
9 reports
The NationalParty-alignedProgressiveFactual 90Objective 703 days agoHouthi rebels in Yemen, backed by Iran, claimed responsibility for attacks on Saudi Aramco facilities in Jizan and Yanbu, escalating tensions between Yemen and Saudi Arabia. The attacks come amid ongoing hostilities, including previous strikes on Saudi infrastructure and a naval blockade. The Houthis accused Saudi Arabia of violating Yemen's sovereignty and vowed retaliation. Saudi Arabia has not officially confirmed the attacks but issued emergency alerts. Experts suggest the conflict could intensify if the Houthis continue targeting Red Sea routes or refuse to resume flights via Sanaa airport. Saudi Arabia has expressed willingness to reopen Sanaa airport to promote peace and aid delivery.
Bias read (Progressive): The article frames the conflict as a struggle over Yemeni sovereignty and international influence, emphasizing the Houthis' resistance to Saudi and Western pressures. It highlights Iran's role in supporting the Houthis and suggests Saudi Arabia's actions are part of a broader geopolitical strategy.
Why factuality (90): The article accurately reports the Houthi claims of attacking Aramco facilities in Jizan and Yanbu. It references statements from Houthi spokespersons and quotes experts like Baraa Al Shaiban. However, it lacks confirmation from Saudi Arabia regarding the attacks, which is appropriate given the lack
Why objectivity (70): The article leans slightly towards the Houthi perspective by quoting their statements and motivations. While it acknowledges the lack of Saudi confirmation, it frames the situation as an escalation by the Houthis, potentially favoring their narrative.
The NationalParty-alignedCenterFactual 85Objective 808 days ago Saudi Arabia rejects Houthi ‘maritime embargo’ threat and warns of Red Sea escalationSaudi Arabia has rejected the Houthi group's announcement of a 'maritime embargo,' calling it false and accusing the Iran-backed movement of spreading disinformation. The Houthis declared the embargo on July 21, 2026, but did not specify how or where it would be implemented. Saudi authorities emphasized their longstanding efforts to assist Yemen through humanitarian aid, development projects, and fuel supplies, while criticizing the Houthis for blocking initiatives like Jordan's proposed flights to Sanaa. A Houthi closure of the Bab Al Mandeb Strait could significantly impact Saudi oil exports and regional trade. The United Nations warned of potential regional escalation and urged de-escalation through dialogue.
Bias read (Center): The article presents both Saudi Arabia's and the Houthi group's positions without overtly favoring either side. It includes statements from multiple stakeholders, such as the Saudi Foreign Ministry, the Saudi-led coalition, and the United Nations, offering a balanced perspective on the situation. No
Why factuality (85): The article accurately describes the Houthi declaration of a maritime embargo and Saudi Arabia's response, noting the potential impact on trade routes. It aligns with other sources regarding the geopolitical tensions and the accusations of false claims by the Houthis. The article provides context ab
Why objectivity (80): While the article presents the facts clearly, it slightly emphasizes Saudi Arabia's perspective, particularly in describing the Houthi claims as 'false' and highlighting the potential consequences of the embargo. This subtle bias affects the overall objectivity score.
The NationalParty-alignedCenterFactual 85Objective 75yesterday Bab Al Mandeb ship traffic slumps 56% since Houthis' Saudi embargoShip traffic through the Bab Al Mandeb strait dropped sharply to 15 vessels on Sunday, marking a 56% decline from 34 crossings on July 20 when Houthi rebels imposed a maritime embargo on Saudi-linked ships. The reduction followed reports of Houthi attacks on Saudi infrastructure and a Saudi ship, with some vessels rerouting via the Cape of Good Hope. Meanwhile, traffic through the Strait of Hormuz nearly doubled, with increased activity linked to a temporary ceasefire between the U.S. and Iran. The changes highlight ongoing tensions in the region, impacting global energy supplies and trade.
Bias read (Center): The article presents a balanced account of developments affecting both Bab Al Mandeb and Hormuz straits, covering actions by Houthi rebels, Saudi responses, and U.S.-Iran dynamics without overtly favoring any side. It includes multiple perspectives and avoids taking a clear ideological stance.
Why factuality (85): The article provides specific data from Kpler showing a 56% decrease in ship traffic through Bab Al Mandeb since the Houthi embargo. It cites the exact date of the embargo (July 20) and mentions the number of vessels (34 then, 15 now). However, it does not clarify whether the Houthi claim of attacki
Why objectivity (75): The article presents facts neutrally but includes phrases like 'fears of a renewed conflict in Yemen escalated' and 'Iran-backed Houthi rebels' which may imply bias. The mention of 'unknown projectile' adds some ambiguity, though it remains generally balanced.
The NationalParty-alignedCenterFactual 85Objective 756 days ago Saudi tanker attacked in Red Sea days after Houthi blockade threatsA Saudi-owned tanker named Encelia was attacked in the Red Sea on Wednesday, causing a fire but leaving all crew members unharmed. The Saudi Press Agency reported the incident, stating it violated international maritime laws. Yemen's Houthi rebels claimed responsibility for the attack, asserting they targeted the vessel for violating a blockade. The Houthi group, backed by Iran, recently imposed a maritime embargo against Saudi Arabia, escalating tensions in the region. The attack has raised concerns about disrupting oil supply routes, particularly as the Red Sea serves as a crucial alternative to the Strait of Hormuz. Oil prices increased due to fears of reduced supply, compounded by ongoing conflicts involving Iran and the United States. The Iranian Revolutionary Guard Corps claimed control over the Strait of Hormuz, a claim disputed by the US military.
Bias read (Center): The article presents information from multiple perspectives including Saudi Arabia, the Houthi rebels, Pakistan, and Iran, without overtly favoring any side. While the conflict involves significant geopolitical actors, the reporting does not exhibit clear ideological leaning. The narrative is based,
Why factuality (85): The article accurately reports the attack on the Encelia tanker and references the Saudi Press Agency and UK Maritime Trade Operations. It also mentions the Houthi declaration of a maritime embargo and the Saudi Foreign Ministry's denial. However, it does not provide independent verification of the
Why objectivity (75): The article maintains a relatively neutral tone, presenting both the Houthi claims and the Saudi response. It avoids strong language but still uses terms like 'violation of international laws' which could be seen as biased.
The NationalParty-alignedProgressiveFactual 85Objective 756 days ago Yemen's STC says rise in Houthi smuggling set stage for Red Sea blockadeThe article reports that the Southern Transitional Council (STC), a group representing southern Yemen, claims that the Saudi Arabia-aligned National Shields have failed to prevent Houthi smuggling activities, potentially leading to a Red Sea blockade. Former STC spokesperson Amr Al Bidh accuses Saudi intervention of empowering the Iran-backed Houthis, who now control northern Yemen and have imposed a naval blockade against Saudi Arabia. Concerns are also raised about increased activity by Al Qaeda in the Arabian Peninsula (AQAP) and Somali extremists Al Shabab facilitating Houthi smuggling. The STC previously led counterterrorism efforts in southern Yemen but was forced to relinquish control to Saudi allies. Current security structures under Saudi backing are still being established, with local tribal leaders playing a key role. Despite being ousted from the internationally recognized Yemeni government, the STC asserts continued grassroots support and criticizes government forces for their ineffectiveness.
Bias read (Progressive): The article frames the Saudi military presence in Yemen as a 'strategic mistake' that empowered the Houthis, using strong language like 'empowered' and 'terrorist groups.' It highlights the STC's perspective while downplaying the legitimacy of Saudi-backed forces, suggesting a left-leaning bias by侧重
Why factuality (85): The article accurately reports Saudi Arabia's rejection of the Houthi 'maritime embargo' and references the Saudi Foreign Ministry's stance. It mentions the potential impact of closing Bab Al Mandeb on oil exports and includes quotes from the Saudi-led coalition. However, it does not provide indepen
Why objectivity (75): The article maintains a neutral tone by presenting both the Houthi declaration and the Saudi response. It avoids taking sides but uses terms like 'false claims' which could be interpreted as biased.
The NationalParty-alignedProgressiveFactual 80Objective 656 days ago Yemen's STC says rise in Houthi smuggling set stage for Red Sea blockadeThe article discusses the situation in southern Yemen following the Saudi Arabia-aligned National Shields' takeover of security operations from the Southern Transitional Council (STC). It highlights concerns over increased Houthi smuggling activities facilitated by the security vacuum, which has allowed groups like Al Qaeda in the Arabian Peninsula (AQAP) and Al Shabab to operate more freely. Former STC officials criticize Saudi intervention as having empowered the Houthis, leading to a naval blockade against Saudi Arabia. The article notes that the new security structures are still developing and face challenges in countering these threats.
Bias read (Progressive): The article frames the Saudi intervention as a 'strategic mistake' that empowered the Houthis and other terrorist groups, using language that implies responsibility for the current conflict dynamics. While it presents multiple actors (Houthis, AQAP, Al Shabab), the emphasis on Saudi influence and HU
Why factuality (80): The article provides specific claims from Amr Al Bidh of the Southern Transitional Council regarding the failure of National Shield Forces to address Houthi smuggling. It references the timeline of events and the involvement of AQAP and Al Shabab. However, it lacks independent corroboration of these
Why objectivity (65): The article presents the perspective of the Southern Transitional Council and criticizes Saudi intervention. It uses phrases like 'strategic mistake' and 'empowered the Houthis,' which may indicate a bias against Saudi policy.
The NationalParty-alignedCenterFactual: no official source document/info detectedObjective 607 days ago Saudi tankers make U-turn in Red Sea, Trump pledges support for Lebanon, and chickenpox spreads in GazaSaudi Arabian oil tankers made a U-turn in the Red Sea following a declaration by the Houthi movement imposing a maritime embargo on Saudi Arabia, sparking concerns over potential disruptions to Gulf trade routes. Kuwait's military reported intercepting missiles and drones attributed to Iran, coinciding with ongoing U.S. airstrikes against Iran. In the United States, former President Donald Trump announced the resumption of direct airline flights to Lebanon, ending a decades-long ban, during a visit by Lebanese President Joseph Aoun. Meanwhile, Gaza is experiencing a rapid spread of chickenpox, with nearly 10,000 cases reported among children within the first two weeks of summer. Additionally, Dubai introduced a promotional initiative offering residents up to Dh3,000 in discounts for hotel and leisure activities if they invite family and friends to visit.
Bias read (Center): The article presents multiple geopolitical developments without overtly favoring any particular side. It reports on actions taken by various countries and groups, including Saudi Arabia, the Houthi movement, Iran, the United States, and Lebanon, while also mentioning health issues in Gaza and a new
Why factuality: no official source document/info detected
Why objectivity (60): As a news roundup, the article is inherently less focused and balanced. It includes various unrelated stories, which dilutes the focus on the main event and may appear less objective due to the inclusion of diverse topics.
The NationalParty-alignedCenter4 hr. ago Iran vs Oman: Two visions for the Strait of HormuzThe article discusses the growing tension between Oman and Iran regarding the management of the Strait of Hormuz, a critical waterway for global trade. Oman advocates for joint regional management of the strait, proposing a system similar to the Strait of Malacca, where nations collaborate on navigation and safety measures. This includes voluntary fees to fund services like search and rescue. In contrast, Iran seeks to retain full control over the strait, using it as leverage in its geopolitical conflicts, particularly with the U.S. and Israel. Iran has previously threatened to impose tolls on shipping, a proposal rejected by Gulf states and the U.S. The dispute has intensified amid rising attacks in the Red Sea, highlighting the strategic importance of the region. Both nations propose different routes through the strait—Oman supports a shared approach while Iran insists on maintaining dominance.
Bias read (Center): The article presents both Oman and Iran's positions without overtly favoring either side. While the issue is politically charged, the framing remains balanced, providing details from both perspectives without clear ideological leaning. The emphasis is on the differing proposals rather than promoting
The NationalParty-alignedCenteryesterday Houthis mimic Iranian behaviour in Red Sea, says Yemeni Foreign MinisterThe Houthis, backed by Iran, have imposed an embargo on Saudi shipping in the Bab Al Mandeb strait, leading to a more than 50% decline in maritime traffic through the critical waterway. Yemen's Foreign Minister, Afrah Al Zouba, accused the Houthis of mimicking Iran's strategy to disrupt shipping in both the Strait of Hormuz and the Red Sea, potentially closing off major energy corridors. Saudi Arabia has responded with airstrikes against Houthi targets and pledged to protect commercial shipping, while Pakistan, bound by a defense pact with Saudi Arabia, has threatened retaliation. The situation threatens to reignite conflict in Yemen, where the war has already caused massive casualties. U.S.-Iran diplomatic talks are ongoing, with discussions including the Red Sea crisis and Iran's earlier closure of the Strait of Hormuz.
Bias read (Center): While the article presents the Houthis' actions as a strategic move inspired by Iran, it does not overtly favor one side over another. It includes multiple perspectives: Saudi accusations, Pakistani threats, and U.S. diplomatic efforts. The framing remains balanced, avoiding strong ideological slant
★
Keep the news honest.
ObjectiveNews is reader-funded and ad-free — we show you the bias instead of hiding it. Support independent journalism for €5/month.
Become a Supporter
AE
