ON
← Back to feed
Prohibited gatherings for minors under 16 after 23:00: in the Loire the curfews suspended by the justice
France🏛️ PoliticsCenter19 days ago

Prohibited gatherings for minors under 16 after 23:00: in the Loire the curfews suspended by the justice

The administrative court in Lyon has suspended the implementation of curfew measures for minors under 16 years old in four towns within the Loire department. These measures, introduced by local mayors in July, prohibit gatherings of more than two people and require minors to be accompanied by a parent or legal guardian after 10 PM. The court ruled that these measures were enacted without specific local circumstances and questioned their proportionality and legality. Mayors, including the mayor of Saint-Chamond, expressed anger over the decision, arguing that the measures were necessary to address public safety concerns. The League of Human Rights expressed satisfaction with the state’s oversight but noted that such legal challenges are rare.

Xenia Fedorova, a Russian propaganda figure and former head of RT France, has been issued with an expulsion order by French authorities, according to her lawyer. The legal action comes after she was placed under house arrest earlier this week. Fedorova’s attorney stated that she is currently abroad and will not return to France unless the expulsion decree is suspended. She has not requested permission from the Paris prefecture to leave the territory and has expressed discomfort with the obligation to check in regularly, though she has not specified her exact location. The expulsion order, announced by the French Ministry of the Interior, claims that Fedorova's actions have harmed the state's fundamental interests and pose a serious and current threat to public order. According to documents reviewed by Libération, her presence in France is considered a risk due to her role as a conduit for Russian disinformation campaigns aimed at destabilizing public order. The ministry described her as a voice of the Kremlin within French media, particularly through her work with media outlets linked to French billionaire Vincent Bolloré. Fedorova, who previously led RT France, has faced criticism over her alignment with Russian narratives. Her employer, Canal+ and Lagardère, which operate CNews and Europe 1 respectively, have publicly opposed the expulsion. In a joint statement, they condemned the measure as a severe blow to freedom of expression and the diversity of opinions. They emphasized that such freedoms must be defended even when views are controversial or unpopular, especially within democratic discourse. The companies noted their surprise at the decision, arguing that preventing Fedorova from participating in public debate would undermine both free speech and pluralism. In June, CNews had already drawn scrutiny from the audiovisual regulator Arcom for promoting a narrow range of viewpoints on issues such as security, the war in Ukraine, immigration, and Islam. The regulator warned the channel to ensure greater diversity of perspectives on air, threatening potential sanctions if compliance was not met. This context adds weight to the current controversy surrounding Fedorova’s expulsion, as it raises questions about the balance between national security concerns and media freedom. Fedorova herself has criticized the move as a new form of political pressure. Her lawyer indicated that she plans to challenge the expulsion order immediately, suggesting that legal proceedings could prolong her stay outside France. Meanwhile, her absence from the country has sparked broader discussions about the role of foreign influence in domestic media and the limits of free speech in times of geopolitical tension. French authorities have not commented further on the specifics of the expulsion order beyond confirming its issuance. However, the underlying rationale, linking Fedorova’s activities to threats against public order, has drawn attention to how states navigate the complex interplay between national security and individual rights. The case highlights the challenges faced by governments in regulating media content while respecting constitutional protections for expression. The situation has also brought into focus the influence of media conglomerates like Bolloré’s empire, which includes several prominent French media outlets. These companies have positioned themselves as defenders of open debate, even when it involves contentious or polarizing views. Their support for Fedorova underscores the ongoing tensions between regulatory bodies, media organizations, and government policies concerning the dissemination of information. As the legal battle unfolds, observers await developments regarding the outcome of Fedorova’s appeal and whether the French government will maintain its stance on her expulsion. The case continues to reflect the broader debate over the boundaries of free speech in a globalized world marked by ideological divides and international conflicts.

3 reports

Le Monde logoLe MondeIndependent🔒CenterFactual 95Objective 8526 days ago
Xenia Fedorova: Administrative Justice rejects appeal by pro-Putin propagandist against her deportation order

Xenia Fedorova, former head of RT France, was ordered to reside in Paris under an expulsion decree. She challenged this decision, but the administrative court rejected her appeal. The court stated that she did not demonstrate any need to leave the Paris area, did not request authorization from the police prefect, and merely mentioned, without specifics, that the requirement to check in caused her discomfort.

Bias read (Center): The article presents a factual account of the legal proceedings against Xenia Fedorova without overtly favoring either side. It reports on the court’s reasoning and does not include biased language or selective sourcing.

Why factuality (95): The article accurately reports the rejection of Xenia Fedorova's appeal by the Paris administrative court. It provides specific details about the legal proceedings and the court's reasoning, aligning closely with the primary source documents.

Why objectivity (85): The article maintains a neutral tone throughout, presenting the court's decision without editorializing or taking a stance on the broader issue of the expulsion. It focuses solely on the legal outcome and the court's rationale.

Le Figaro logoLe FigaroIndependent🔒CenterFactual 85Objective 7023 days ago
Prohibited gatherings for minors under 16 after 23:00: in the Loire the curfews suspended by the justice

The administrative court in Lyon has suspended the implementation of curfew measures for minors under 16 years old in four towns within the Loire department. These measures, introduced by local mayors in July, prohibit gatherings of more than two people and require minors to be accompanied by a parent or legal guardian after 10 PM. The court ruled that these measures were enacted without specific local circumstances and questioned their proportionality and legality. Mayors, including the mayor of Saint-Chamond, expressed anger over the decision, arguing that the measures were necessary to address public safety concerns. The League of Human Rights expressed satisfaction with the state’s oversight but noted that such legal challenges are rare.

Bias read (Center): The article presents both perspectives: the court's legal challenge to the mayors' decisions and the mayors' defense of the measures as necessary for public safety. While the court questions the legality and proportionality of the measures, it does not overtly criticize the mayors' intentions or the

Why factuality (85): The article discusses a decision by the Tribunal Administratif de Lyon suspending curfews for minors in four towns in the Loire department. It references legal arguments and local mayors' positions, but does not mention the fire in the Pyrénées-Orientales or the broader wildfire situation mentioned

Why objectivity (70): The tone is somewhat critical of the mayors' decisions, suggesting they were made without proper local circumstances. There is some editorializing in phrases like 'seul l’État doit pouvoir posseder les armes,' which implies a political stance.

Le Parisien logoLe ParisienIndependentCenterFactual 65Objective 7019 days ago
Sarcelles: party ends with stabbings, three injured

In Sarcelles, a festive event ended violently with knife attacks, resulting in three injured individuals. The incident occurred during what was initially a celebration, but turned chaotic when knives were used. Local authorities are investigating the circumstances surrounding the attack, which has raised concerns about public safety in the area. No specific details about the perpetrators or motives have been officially released at this time.

Bias read (Center): The article reports on a violent incident without overtly taking a political stance. While such events can sometimes be linked to broader social or political issues, the piece focuses primarily on the factual occurrence without emphasizing any particular ideological angle. The lack of explicit bias,

Why factuality (65): The article reports on an incident in Sarcelles where a festival ended with knife attacks resulting in three injuries. While no primary source was available, the report aligns with cross-source consensus regarding similar incidents in the area. The level of detail is limited, but the core facts appe

Why objectivity (70): The tone remains relatively neutral, focusing on the event without overt bias. However, the language used ('fête se termine par des coups de couteau') carries a somewhat dramatic tone, which may slightly influence reader perception.

How each side covered it

The same event, grouped by the political lean of the outlets covering it.

How each side covered it

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Covered around the world

The same event as reported in other countries.

Covered around the world

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Claims check

Key factual claims, and how many sources assert vs dispute each.

Claims check

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Keep the news honest.

ObjectiveNews is reader-funded and ad-free — we show you the bias instead of hiding it. Support independent journalism for €4/month.

Become a Supporter

Related stories