ON
← Back to feed
Singer Liz Mitchell is outraged by Boney M's appearance at Reform UK
Austria🏛️ PoliticsLean Progressive9/7/2026

Singer Liz Mitchell is outraged by Boney M's appearance at Reform UK

Former lead singer of Boney M., Liz Mitchell, expressed outrage over a performance by a group claiming to be Boney M. at a conference organized by the UK's right-populist Reform Party. Mitchell stated she was shocked to learn her songs were being used for political purposes, emphasizing their cultural significance to people worldwide. She criticized performing at an event that does not welcome those in need, calling it selling her soul and heritage for money. The performance, led by Maizie Williams, was initially announced as a celebration after a conference but later revealed to be linked to Reform UK. Williams’ manager denied any political ties, stating the performance aimed to spread joy regardless of race or faith. Mitchell also addressed the controversy around the band’s name, noting that Williams did not sing on Boney M.'s famous tracks and that the legal rights to the band name remain disputed.

Liz Mitchell, the former lead singer of the iconic 1970s pop group Boney M., expressed outrage over a recent performance by a version of the band at a conference organized by the far-right British party Reform UK. The event took place in Birmingham and featured a lineup led by Maizie Williams, who has performed under the Boney M name since the band’s dissolution in the late 1980s. Mitchell, 74, condemned the decision, stating that the performers knew they were being used for political purposes, with songs that hold deep cultural significance worldwide. Mitchell criticized the choice of venue, describing it as an event that does not welcome those in need. She argued that appearing at such a gathering amounted to selling one’s soul and heritage for financial gain. This sentiment was echoed by fans, many of whom reportedly expressed shock and distress upon learning of the performance. Mitchell clarified that she had no involvement in the event and expressed deep sorrow that her music was being exploited. The performance was initially announced as a celebration following a conference, but it later became clear that it was tied to Reform UK. According to Maizie Williams’ manager, Donavon Nelson, the group supports no political parties and does not engage in politics. He emphasized that the performance was meant to spread joy regardless of race, faith, or belief, though he acknowledged that the event was misinterpreted by some. Mitchell highlighted her family history, noting that her father was part of the Windrush generation, which brought Caribbean migrants to the UK in the post-war era. She herself was born in Jamaica and received an MBE for her contributions to music and charity. She stressed the importance of maintaining the UK as a welcoming country for immigrants and asylum seekers. The issue of the band’s name usage remains legally contentious. While Williams has performed with others as Boney M. featuring Maizie Williams since the 1990s, Mitchell maintains that the band’s legacy belongs to the original members, including herself and Marcia Barrett. She lamented that individuals without knowledge of the band’s true history attempt to impersonate the artists, undermining the authenticity of the music. Mitchell accused the current performers of disregarding the historical and emotional weight of Boney M.’s songs, claiming they understand that none of them actually sang the tracks. She reiterated that the purpose of the band’s music was to connect with people globally, not to be co-opted by political agendas. Representatives of the current Boney M lineup defended their appearance, asserting that it was purely for entertainment and that their performances are open to all, regardless of personal beliefs or backgrounds. They noted that similar acts, such as The Jacksons, have also performed at past Reform UK events, suggesting that such collaborations are not uncommon. Despite this, Mitchell remains steadfast in her criticism, emphasizing the ethical implications of using culturally significant music for political ends.

How this report was made. Objective News wrote this report from 2 source articles, using AI-assisted synthesis under our methodology. It is our own text, not a copy of any single outlet. Read our methodology.

Responsible editor: Matej BašaSpotted an error? Report it

2 reports

Kurier logoKurierParty-alignedCenterFactual 88Objective 729/7/2026
Singer Liz Mitchell is outraged by Boney M's appearance at Reform UK

Former lead singer of Boney M., Liz Mitchell, expressed outrage over a performance by a group claiming to be Boney M. at a conference organized by the UK's right-populist Reform Party. Mitchell stated she was shocked to learn her songs were being used for political purposes, emphasizing their cultural significance to people worldwide. She criticized performing at an event that does not welcome those in need, calling it selling her soul and heritage for money. The performance, led by Maizie Williams, was initially announced as a celebration after a conference but later revealed to be linked to Reform UK. Williams’ manager denied any political ties, stating the performance aimed to spread joy regardless of race or faith. Mitchell also addressed the controversy around the band’s name, noting that Williams did not sing on Boney M.'s famous tracks and that the legal rights to the band name remain disputed.

Bias read (Center): The article presents both perspectives, Mitchell's criticism of the political use of her music and the manager's denial of political affiliation, without overtly favoring one side. It provides balanced quotes from both parties involved and avoids explicit endorsement or condemnation of either position

Why factuality (88): This article provides detailed and consistent information about the event, including quotes from Liz Mitchell and her manager Donavon Nelson. It also mentions Mitchell's family background and connects it to the broader issue of immigration, which adds contextual depth. The facts align closely with t

Why objectivity (72): While the article is generally informative, it emphasizes Mitchell's personal perspective and emotional response more prominently. This can be seen as slightly biased towards her viewpoint, even though it does include counterpoints from Nelson.

ORF News logoORF NewsState / PublicProgressiveFactual 85Objective 759/7/2026
Liz Mitchell is outraged by Boney M's appearance at Reform UK

Liz Mitchell, ehemalige Leadsängerin von Boney M., hat sich über den Auftritt ihrer Band bei einem Parteitag der britischen rechtspopulistischen Partei Reform UK geäußert. Sie kritisierte den Einsatz ihrer Hits wie 'Rivers Of Babylon' und 'Daddy Cool' für politische Zwecke, was sie als Verkauf der eigenen Identität und Herkunft beschreibt. Die Veranstaltung wurde von Nigel Farages Partei organisiert, während der Auftritt ursprünglich als neutrale Feier nach einer Konferenz angekündigt war. Mitchells Manager Donavon Nelson betonte, dass keine politische Unterstützung geleistet oder in die Politik eingegriffen wurde. Mitchell berichtete auch von schockierten Fans, die sich über den Auftritt äußerten, und betonte, dass sie selbst mit dem Vorgang nichts zu tun habe.

Bias read (Progressive): Die Artikelberichterstattung betont die emotionale Reaktion von Liz Mitchell und die Kritik an der politischen Instrumentalisierung ihrer Musik, was eine linke Perspektive widerspiegelt. Der Fokus liegt auf der moralischen Verurteilung des Einsatzes von popkulturellen Symbolen für rechte politischeZ

Why factuality (85): The article accurately reports Liz Mitchell's reaction to Boney M.'s appearance at Reform UK's party convention. It includes quotes from Mitchell and her manager Donavon Nelson, as well as details about the event's context. The information aligns with the cross-source consensus, though there is no p

Why objectivity (75): The tone is somewhat emotionally charged, particularly in Mitchell's statements about selling her 'soul and heritage.' While the article presents both sides (Mitchell's criticism and Nelson's defense), it leans slightly toward highlighting the controversy and emotional impact rather than maintaining

How each side covered it

The same event, grouped by the political lean of the outlets covering it.

How each side covered it

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Covered around the world

The same event as reported in other countries.

Covered around the world

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Claims check

Key factual claims, and how many sources assert vs dispute each.

Claims check

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Keep the news honest.

ObjectiveNews is reader-funded and ad-free — we show you the bias instead of hiding it. Support independent journalism for €4/month.

Become a Supporter

Related stories