ON
← Back to feed
elDiario.es logo🏛️ Politics
Spain🏛️ PoliticsLean Conservative2 days ago

A US-Israeli ultra network uses Ceuta to attack Spain

Un análisis publicado en el think tank estadounidense Middle East Forum sugiere que Marruecos debería reanudar la 'Marcha Verde' para expulsar a los colonos españoles de Ceuta y Melilla, criticando la presencia española en esos territorios. La publicación se da en el contexto de la crisis migratoria en Ceuta, donde se ha especulado que Israel y Estados Unidos podrían estar involucrados. El Middle East Forum, conocido por su orientación proisraelí y extremadamente derechista, ha financiado movimientos ultraderecheros y ha sido acusado de islamofobia. Además, se menciona el papel de figuras como el exasesor del gobierno israelí y el embajador israelí en la ONU, quienes han defendido esta narrativa. La crítica se dirige al gobierno español, particularmente al partido socialista liderado por Pedro Sánchez, por su postura anticolonialista y su oposición a las políticas israelíes.

The Spanish government has frozen its security plan for Ceuta and Melilla following a shift in diplomatic relations with Morocco. The decision comes amid heightened tensions over border control and sovereignty issues, with local authorities accusing the national government of inaction. The dispute escalated after Morocco announced a change in its approach toward Spain’s North African territories. Officials in Ceuta, a city-autonomous region within Spain, have expressed frustration over what they describe as a lack of support from Madrid. On Monday, the mayor of Ceuta, Juan Jesús Vivas, took a more confrontational stance, threatening legal action against the central government if the situation does not improve within 30 days. Vivas accused the national administration of “almost absolute passivity,” marking a departure from his previously measured public statements. Vivas, who leads the Popular Party in Ceuta, stated that he intends to bring the issue before the Supreme Court and the Constitutional Court, emphasizing the importance of judicial oversight. He described the current state of affairs in Ceuta as one of “exceptional circumstances,” suggesting that the situation has reached a critical point. His remarks reflect growing concerns among local leaders about the effectiveness of Spain’s policies in managing cross-border challenges. Ceuta and Melilla, both autonomous cities within Spain, have long been points of contention between Spain and Morocco. The two regions share land borders with Morocco, making them strategic locations for immigration and security operations. Recent months have seen increased activity at these borders, with reports of unauthorized crossings and disputes over territorial jurisdiction. The Moroccan government has historically maintained a firm stance on the sovereignty of these areas, which Spain claims under international law. The freeze on the security plan is believed to be a direct response to Morocco’s recent diplomatic moves. While the exact terms of the agreement between Spain and Morocco remain unclear, officials in Ceuta suggest that the new approach involves greater cooperation and shared responsibility in managing the border. This could include joint patrols or coordinated efforts to monitor movement across the frontier. However, such measures would require legislative approval and have sparked debate among political factions in Spain. Local leaders argue that the national government has failed to provide adequate resources or clear directives to address the ongoing crisis. They claim that the lack of decisive action has led to a sense of instability and uncertainty in Ceuta. Some residents have reported increased police presence and stricter controls, but others feel that these measures are insufficient given the scale of the problem. The situation has also raised questions about the balance of power between regional governments and the central authority in Madrid. As the standoff continues, the potential for further escalation remains high. Legal threats from local officials indicate that the pressure on the national government is intensifying. Meanwhile, the Moroccan government has signaled a willingness to engage in dialogue, though the specifics of this engagement remain uncertain. The outcome of these developments will likely depend on how quickly the Spanish government responds to the demands from Ceuta and whether it can find a resolution that satisfies all parties involved.

Go to the primary sources (5)

The official sources this coverage is built on. Read them directly to bypass framing.

2 reports

elDiario.es logoelDiario.esIndependentConservativeFactual 75Objective 402 days ago
A US-Israeli ultra network uses Ceuta to attack Spain

Un análisis publicado en el think tank estadounidense Middle East Forum sugiere que Marruecos debería reanudar la 'Marcha Verde' para expulsar a los colonos españoles de Ceuta y Melilla, criticando la presencia española en esos territorios. La publicación se da en el contexto de la crisis migratoria en Ceuta, donde se ha especulado que Israel y Estados Unidos podrían estar involucrados. El Middle East Forum, conocido por su orientación proisraelí y extremadamente derechista, ha financiado movimientos ultraderecheros y ha sido acusado de islamofobia. Además, se menciona el papel de figuras como el exasesor del gobierno israelí y el embajador israelí en la ONU, quienes han defendido esta narrativa. La crítica se dirige al gobierno español, particularmente al partido socialista liderado por Pedro Sánchez, por su postura anticolonialista y su oposición a las políticas israelíes.

Bias read (Conservative): El artículo presenta una narrativa favorable a Marruecos y crítica hacia la presencia española en Ceuta y Melilla, utilizando términos como 'colonos españoles' y 'ocupación'. Se menciona el apoyo de grupos conservadores en EE.UU. y Israel, así como la influencia de think tanks proisraelíes. La elecc

Why factuality (75): The article discusses a different event (Ceuta crisis) and mentions the Middle East Forum's past involvement with Tommy Robinson, but does not directly address the current situation of Tommy Robinson. It references the forum's stance on Spain and colonial issues, which is unrelated to the primary so

Why objectivity (40): The tone is clearly biased against Spain and supports Israeli and US interests. The language suggests a strong ideological stance and presents a narrative that frames Spain negatively, while implying conspiracy theories about Israel and the US. This shows a lack of neutrality.

El Periódico logoEl PeriódicoIndependentCenterFactual 60Objective 653 days ago
The Government froze the Security Plan for Ceuta and Melilla after its turn with Morocco

The Spanish government has frozen the security plan for Ceuta and Melilla following a change in approach with Morocco. The decision comes after negotiations with Moroccan authorities, which reportedly led to a shift in the strategy regarding border control and security measures in these territories. The move suggests a potential reduction in military presence or a reevaluation of current protocols. Details on the specifics of the new approach remain unclear at this time.

Bias read (Center): The article reports on a governmental decision without overtly criticizing or praising the action. It presents the event factually without clear ideological framing, suggesting a balanced approach. There is no strong emphasis on specific political ideologies or partisan perspectives.

Why factuality (60): This article mentions the government freezing the security plan for Ceuta and Melilla following a turn with Morocco, but provides very little detail. There is no primary source to verify this claim, and the cross-source consensus does not confirm the specifics. The lack of elaboration makes it diffi

Why objectivity (65): The article is brief and lacks contextual explanation, but it does not appear to take a clear ideological stance. It presents the event as a factual development without evident bias or emotional language, making it more objective than the first article.

🎬 Videos from this story (4)

How each side covered it

The same event, grouped by the political lean of the outlets covering it.

How each side covered it

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Covered around the world

The same event as reported in other countries.

Covered around the world

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Claims check

Key factual claims, and how many sources assert vs dispute each.

Claims check

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Keep the news honest.

ObjectiveNews is reader-funded and ad-free — we show you the bias instead of hiding it. Support independent journalism for €4/month.

Become a Supporter

Related stories