ON
← Back to feed
Sally Rooney could have made things a great deal easier for herself. She chose not to
Ireland🏛️ PoliticsLean Progressive3 days ago

Sally Rooney could have made things a great deal easier for herself. She chose not to

Sally Rooney, the Irish author, publicly supported the Palestinian activist group Palestine Action after the UK government designated it as a terrorist organization. This designation made it illegal to financially support the group or express support for it. Despite potential legal repercussions, Rooney wrote an article criticizing the Irish government for not speaking out about Irish citizens arrested in the UK for supporting Palestine Action. She defended the group's actions, including breaking into an RAF base to protest UK military support for Israel. Rooney stated she would continue using her platform and earnings to support Palestine Action, even if it meant being labeled a 'supporter of terror' under UK law. As a result, her UK publisher, Faber, stopped paying her royalties due to the legal risks involved.

Sally Rooney’s novels are no longer distributed in the United Kingdom following a joint decision with her publisher, Faber, to halt sales due to legal risks associated with her public support for Palestine Action. The Irish author stated on Wednesday that fulfilling publishing contracts in the UK could now constitute a serious criminal offense under British terrorism legislation. Faber confirmed it can no longer supply Rooney’s work in any format within the country, though it will continue to sell her titles in other territories. This move follows the UK government’s proscription of Palestine Action as a terrorist organization, a designation that has created a legal environment where providing financial aid or even expressing support for the group is a crime. Rooney explained that her publicly stated intention to use royalties from her work to support Palestine Action placed her publisher in a precarious position. Faber noted that current UK legislation prevents it from passing on earnings generated in Britain to the author. The publisher described the scenario of selling a writer’s work while being unable to remit the income as an unconscionable situation. Consequently, Faber agreed with Rooney to cease distribution in the UK. Rooney emphasized that she had consulted extensively with the publisher and gave her full consent to the decision. She stated she had made every effort to be honest with the public regarding her beliefs and was prepared to accept the resulting consequences. The legal backdrop for this decision involves the UK government’s classification of Palestine Action as a terrorist organization last summer. Under this designation, it is a criminal offense to provide financial assistance to the group or to hold opinions supportive of it. Activists of the group engage in direct action against arms manufacturers whose weapons are supplied to Israel. A specific incident involving the breaking into an RAF airbase in Oxfordshire and spraying red paint on aircraft precipitated the final push for the proscription. Since the ban took effect, authorities have arrested more than 3,700 individuals for opposing the proscription, many of whom were holding signs stating, "I oppose genocide. I support Palestine Action." Rooney’s involvement with the cause began with an article written for The Irish Times criticizing the Irish government’s silence regarding Irish citizens arrested in the UK for supporting the group. Those citizens faced potential prison terms of up to 14 years under the new legislation. In the article, Rooney defended the group’s tactics against arms dealers and explicitly aligned herself with the organization. She warned that if UK law deemed her a supporter of terrorism, she intended to continue using her platform and earnings to support the cause. She specifically mentioned receiving residual payments from the BBC for television adaptations of her novels Normal People and Conversations with Friends, suggesting that if the state considered her actions terrorist activity, it should investigate the organizations promoting her work. This stance has had prior repercussions for Rooney’s professional life in Britain. In September 2025, she canceled a trip to the UK to accept the Sky Arts award for her 2024 novel Intermezzo due to the risk of arrest under the Terrorism Act. Later that year, in November 2025, she submitted a statement to the High Court supporting a legal challenge to the proscription. In that filing, she argued that the ban impeded free expression, including cultural and artistic expression, and warned that her works might vanish from UK bookstores entirely. The immediate impact of the distribution halt has caused a rush among readers. Independent bookshops across London reported selling out of Rooney’s titles rapidly. Brick Lane Bookshop stated that all copies of her books were out of stock and that they did not expect to receive further inventory. Staff at Pages of Hackney noted that purchasing from wholesalers was no longer possible. At Daunt Books in Marylebone, employees described the situation as a shame, confirming that while they could sell remaining stock, they could not restock. Paddy Screech, co-owner of Word on the Water, said he would keep Rooney’s books on his shelves as long as sourcing and selling remained legal. He questioned the connection between the author’s political views and her literary output, calling the publisher’s withdrawal evidence of the madness of the law. Reaction to the situation has been divided. Hundreds of authors signed an open letter over the weekend supporting Rooney. Conversely, sections of the right-wing press have criticized her, using terms such as "tedious," "malicious," and "posturing ingrate." The controversy highlights the tension between anti-terrorism legislation and freedom of expression. While Palestine Action is not banned in the Republic of Ireland, where Rooney resides, the UK’s strict enforcement has effectively removed her primary market for new book sales. Faber maintains that it remains the proud publisher of Rooney’s body of work and will continue to distribute her titles internationally. For now, existing copies of her books scattered throughout UK retail stores represent the final available stock for domestic buyers.

How this report was made. Objective News wrote this report from 2 source articles, using AI-assisted synthesis under our methodology. It is our own text, not a copy of any single outlet. Read our methodology.

Responsible editor: Matej BašaSpotted an error? Report it

2 reports

The Irish Times logoThe Irish TimesIndependent🔒ProgressiveFactual 95Objective 853 days ago
Sally Rooney could have made things a great deal easier for herself. She chose not to

Sally Rooney, the Irish author, publicly supported the Palestinian activist group Palestine Action after the UK government designated it as a terrorist organization. This designation made it illegal to financially support the group or express support for it. Despite potential legal repercussions, Rooney wrote an article criticizing the Irish government for not speaking out about Irish citizens arrested in the UK for supporting Palestine Action. She defended the group's actions, including breaking into an RAF base to protest UK military support for Israel. Rooney stated she would continue using her platform and earnings to support Palestine Action, even if it meant being labeled a 'supporter of terror' under UK law. As a result, her UK publisher, Faber, stopped paying her royalties due to the legal risks involved.

Bias read (Progressive): The article frames the UK government's designation of Palestine Action as a terrorist organization as unjust and highlights Rooney's criticism of the Irish government's silence on the issue. The narrative supports the actions of Palestine Action and criticizes the legal consequences faced by those,像

Why factuality (95): The article provides specific details about the UK government's proscription of Palestine Action, the potential legal consequences for supporting the group, and Sally Rooney's public response through an article in The Irish Times. These facts align with general knowledge of the situation and are con

Why objectivity (85): The article presents Sally Rooney's actions and statements in a largely neutral manner, though it does include some emotionally charged language such as 'campaign of slaughter' and 'genocide,' which may reflect the author's perspective rather than strictly objective reporting.

TheJournal.ie logoTheJournal.ieIndependentCenterFactual 85Objective 756 days ago
UK bookshops sell out of Sally Rooney after Palestine support forces publisher to stop circulation

Sally Rooney's UK publisher has ceased selling her books in the country due to legal concerns related to the government's designation of a Palestinian group she supports as a terrorist organization. This decision follows increased pressure on bookstores, which have reportedly sold out of Rooney's works amid public support for Palestine. The situation highlights tensions between authors' political stances and the legal frameworks governing publishing in the UK.

Bias read (Center): The article presents a factual account of the publisher's decision based on legal concerns without overtly favoring any political side. It does not include biased language, one-sided sourcing, or editorializing that would indicate a clear ideological lean.

Why factuality (85): The article provides specific details such as Faber's decision to stop circulating Rooney's books in the UK due to legal concerns related to her support for Palestine Action, which is designated as a terrorist organization by the UK government. It also quotes statements from Faber and mentions the i

Why objectivity (75): The article presents the situation relatively neutrally, quoting both Faber and Paddy Screech. However, it emphasizes the 'selling out' aspect and includes a photo of Rooney, which may subtly highlight her role in the story. The tone remains mostly factual but slightly leans toward emphasizing the c

How each side covered it

The same event, grouped by the political lean of the outlets covering it.

How each side covered it

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Covered around the world

The same event as reported in other countries.

Covered around the world

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Claims check

Key factual claims, and how many sources assert vs dispute each.

Claims check

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Keep the news honest.

ObjectiveNews is reader-funded and ad-free — we show you the bias instead of hiding it. Support independent journalism for €4/month.

Become a Supporter

Related stories