ON
← Back to feed
Saxony-Anhalt: Will the Greens of the AfD make it through the march?
Germany🏛️ PoliticsCenter7/30/2026

Saxony-Anhalt: Will the Greens of the AfD make it through the march?

In einer neuesten Umfrage von Infratest dimap aus dem Juli 2025 zeigt sich, dass die AfD in Sachsen-Anhalt ihre Stimmenanteile leicht steigert und auf 41 Prozent kommt, während die CDU auf 24 Prozent zurückgeht. Gleichzeitig ziehen die Grünen mit einem Plus von einem Prozent auf 5 Prozent in den Landtag ein, was die Chancen der AfD auf eine absolute Mehrheit verringert. Die SPD bleibt bei 7 Prozent stabil, und die Linkspartei gewinnt einen Punkt auf 13 Prozent. Das BSW bleibt bei 4 Prozent, während die FDP unter die 'Sonstigen' fällt. Zudem zeichnet sich bei den Spitzenkandidaten ab: Der AfD-Kandidat Ulrich Siegmund übertrifft erstmals den CDU-Kandidaten Sven Schulze in seiner Zufriedenheitsrate, obwohl Schulze weiterhin höhere Bekanntheitswerte hat. Diese Entwicklung erfolgt im Kontext politischer Turbulenzen innerhalb der CDU und nach dem Anschlag auf den Christopher Street Day.

In the run-up to the September 6 regional election in Saxony-Anhalt, the far-right Alternative for Germany (AfD) continues to lead with 41 percent according to a new poll conducted by Infratest dimap. The Christian Democratic Union (CDU), which previously held 26 percent, has dropped to 24 percent. The survey, carried out between July 23 and 28 among 1,149 eligible voters, was commissioned by the regional broadcaster MDR and local newspapers Mitteldeutsche Zeitung and Volksstimme. This comes amid ongoing turmoil within the federal CDU and following the attack on the Christopher Street Day parade in Berlin on July 25. The AfD’s chances of securing an outright majority in the state parliament remain unchanged despite the CDU's decline. The Greens have regained entry into the state legislature, increasing their support by one percentage point to five percent. With more parties represented in the parliament, the likelihood of the AfD achieving sole rule diminishes. Meanwhile, the Social Democrats (SPD) maintain their position at seven percent, while the Left Party rises slightly to 13 percent. The Free Democratic Party (FDP), once a parliamentary force, is now listed under “Others” due to low approval ratings. Personal popularity rankings among potential candidates show notable shifts. AfD candidate Ulrich Siegmund has surpassed CDU candidate Sven Schulze for the first time, with 35 percent of respondents expressing satisfaction with Siegmund’s work compared to 29 percent for Schulze. This marks a departure from earlier polls in late 2025, when both were tied at 20 percent. Despite Schulze’s recent appointment as CDU’s top candidate, his approval rating has not reached the levels achieved by former long-serving leader Reiner Haseloff, who had consistently higher visibility and satisfaction scores. Schulze maintains a slight edge in overall recognition, with 65 percent of respondents identifying him, compared to Siegmund’s 63 percent. However, Schulze’s approval is lower than Haseloff’s previous figures, particularly among younger voters, men, and less-educated groups, where Siegmund leads. Schulze, however, garners stronger support among older voters and less-educated individuals, an unusual trend for a CDU candidate. Public satisfaction with the current coalition government, comprising CDU, SPD, and FDP, has also declined. It fell from 33 percent in May to 29 percent currently. This dissatisfaction reflects broader discontent with the ruling party’s performance and governance. Among CDU supporters, there is a clear divide regarding potential alliances. Eighty-two percent reject cooperation with the AfD, while only 16 percent support such a move. Conversely, AfD supporters are split, with 55 percent favoring a coalition with the CDU and 39 percent opposing it. When considering the Left Party, 52 percent of CDU supporters reject a coalition, whereas 41 percent are open to it. The Left Party’s supporters, however, overwhelmingly back a partnership with the CDU, with 91 percent in favor. The political landscape in Saxony-Anhalt remains fluid, with shifting public sentiment and internal party dynamics influencing the outcome of the upcoming election. As the campaign progresses, the interplay between established parties and rising forces will likely shape the final results.

5 reports

Frankfurter Allgemeine (FAZ) logoFrankfurter Allgemeine (FAZ)Independent🔒CenterFactual 80Objective 757/30/2026
Saxony-Anhalt: Will the Greens of the AfD make it through the march?

In einer neuesten Umfrage von Infratest dimap aus dem Juli 2025 zeigt sich, dass die AfD in Sachsen-Anhalt ihre Stimmenanteile leicht steigert und auf 41 Prozent kommt, während die CDU auf 24 Prozent zurückgeht. Gleichzeitig ziehen die Grünen mit einem Plus von einem Prozent auf 5 Prozent in den Landtag ein, was die Chancen der AfD auf eine absolute Mehrheit verringert. Die SPD bleibt bei 7 Prozent stabil, und die Linkspartei gewinnt einen Punkt auf 13 Prozent. Das BSW bleibt bei 4 Prozent, während die FDP unter die 'Sonstigen' fällt. Zudem zeichnet sich bei den Spitzenkandidaten ab: Der AfD-Kandidat Ulrich Siegmund übertrifft erstmals den CDU-Kandidaten Sven Schulze in seiner Zufriedenheitsrate, obwohl Schulze weiterhin höhere Bekanntheitswerte hat. Diese Entwicklung erfolgt im Kontext politischer Turbulenzen innerhalb der CDU und nach dem Anschlag auf den Christopher Street Day.

Bias read (Center): Der Artikel präsentiert die Ergebnisse einer Umfrage neutral und berichtet objektiv über die politische Situation in Sachsen-Anhalt. Es werden alle relevanten Parteien erwähnt, ohne eine klare parteipolitische Haltung zu zeigen. Die Berichterstattung bleibt sachlich und konzentriert sich auf Fakten,

Why factuality (80): The article closely mirrors the primary source document, accurately reporting the AfD’s 41% support, the CDU’s 24%, and the SPD and Greens crossing the five percent threshold. It provides detailed information without adding misleading context.

Why objectivity (75): The tone remains neutral, presenting the data objectively without injecting personal opinions or emotional language. It balances the report without favoring any specific political outcome.

Stern logoSternIndependentCenterFactual 70Objective 607/30/2026
Why Frauke Brosius-Gersdorf is skeptical of a ban on the AfD

The article discusses Frauke Brosius-Gersdorf's skepticism towards a potential ban of the AfD (Alternative für Deutschland), a far-right political party in Germany. Brosius-Gersdorf, likely a political figure or commentator, expresses doubts about the effectiveness or fairness of such a ban, suggesting there may be underlying complexities or alternative approaches to addressing the party's influence. The conversation highlights differing opinions within political circles regarding the best strategies to handle extremist parties. No specific policies or outcomes are detailed beyond the expressed views.

Bias read (Center): The article presents a balanced discussion of Brosius-Gersdorf's perspective without overtly favoring either side of the debate. It does not take a clear ideological stance but rather reports on the skepticism surrounding the AfD ban, leaving room for multiple interpretations. There is no strong sl抗

Why factuality (70): This article presents a specific case where an AfD council member was convicted for Nazi-related statements but did not resign, providing a concrete example relevant to the broader discussion.

Why objectivity (60): The article highlights criticism of the AfD but does not present opposing viewpoints, leading to a one-sided perspective.

Stern logoSternIndependentCenterFactual 65Objective 607/30/2026
Why Frauke Brosius-Gersdorf is skeptical of a ban on the AfD

Frauke Brosius-Gersdorf expresses skepticism toward potential bans on the Alternative für Deutschland (AfD) party. She argues against such measures, suggesting they could undermine democratic processes rather than address underlying issues. Brosius-Gersdorf emphasizes dialogue and legal avenues over restrictive actions, highlighting her belief in the importance of allowing all voices within the political spectrum to be heard. Her stance reflects concerns about the implications of banning political parties and the potential for such actions to polarize society further.

Bias read (Center): The article presents Frauke Brosius-Gersdorf's perspective on the potential ban of the AfD, offering her arguments without overtly favoring one side. It provides a balanced view by focusing on her skepticism and reasoning, avoiding strong ideological framing or biased language.

Why factuality (65): This article is brief and lacks detailed information. It only states that the SPD in Saxony-Anhalt opposes the five percent threshold for parties, without providing any supporting data or context. There is no primary source cited, reducing its factual reliability.

Why objectivity (60): The article presents a single opinion (from the SPD) without offering alternative viewpoints or context, which limits its objectivity. It appears to promote the SPD’s stance without balancing it with other perspectives.

Die Welt logoDie WeltIndependent🔒CenterFactual 60Objective 507/30/2026
Poll: AfD remains the strongest force in Saxony-Anhalt CDU loses, SPD and Greens over five percent hurdle

A recent survey conducted by Die Welt indicates that the Alternative for Germany (AfD) remains the strongest political force in Saxony-Anhalt. The Christian Democratic Union (CDU) has lost ground, while both the Social Democrats (SPD) and the Greens (Grüne) have crossed the five percent threshold required for representation in the state parliament. This development highlights shifting political dynamics within the region, with the AfD maintaining its position despite broader challenges faced by traditional parties.

Bias read (Center): The article presents factual survey results without overtly favoring any particular political stance. It reports on the performance of multiple parties without using emotionally charged language or emphasizing one side over another. While the AfD's continued strength is noted, this is presented as a

Why factuality (60): The article references the primary source document and discusses the political tensions around Chancellor Merkel, but it shifts focus to internal CDU conflicts rather than the election poll itself. This makes it partially relevant but less focused on the core event.

Why objectivity (50): The tone is critical of Chancellor Merkel and the CDU leadership, suggesting a bias against them. While it doesn’t outright attack the CDU, the language carries a negative undertone.

Focus Online logoFocus OnlineIndependentCenterFactual 55Objective 407/30/2026
Before the election in Saxony-Anhalt: CDU loses another two percent AfD ahead by 17 points

In the lead-up to the election in Saxony-Anhalt, the Christian Democratic Union (CDU) has lost an additional two percentage points in opinion polls, while the Alternative for Germany (AfD) leads with 17 percent. This development reflects shifting voter preferences ahead of the regional election. The CDU's decline suggests potential challenges in maintaining its traditional support base, whereas the AfD's strong showing indicates growing influence among voters in the region. These poll results are significant as they provide insight into the current political landscape before the official voting takes place.

Bias read (Center): The article presents factual polling data without overtly biased language or selective emphasis. It reports on shifts in voter preference without taking a stance on which party is more deserving of support or criticizing any specific group. The information is presented neutrally, focusing on the raw

Why factuality (55): The article reports that the AfD has 17 points ahead, but the primary source states AfD has 41 percent. This is a significant discrepancy. The CDU is reported to have lost two more percentage points, conflicting with the primary source which says they lost two points from May to reach 24%. The artic

Why objectivity (40): The tone is sensationalistic, using phrases like 'verliert weitere zwei Prozent' which implies a dramatic decline. It frames the AfD's lead as a major development without providing balanced context or mentioning opposition views.

How each side covered it

The same event, grouped by the political lean of the outlets covering it.

How each side covered it

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Covered around the world

The same event as reported in other countries.

Covered around the world

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Claims check

Key factual claims, and how many sources assert vs dispute each.

Claims check

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Keep the news honest.

ObjectiveNews is reader-funded and ad-free — we show you the bias instead of hiding it. Support independent journalism for €4/month.

Become a Supporter

Related stories