S. Korea says respects 'One China' policy amid Taiwan Pavilion dispute

The Korea HeraldIndependentCenter4 days ago

The Korean Ministry of Foreign Affairs reaffirmed its commitment to the 'One China' policy after a dispute arose during the Gwangju Biennale regarding the naming of a Chinese pavilion as 'Taiwan Pavilion.' The Chinese pavilion team withdrew from the event in protest, claiming the name introduced political issues into the arts. A ministry spokesperson emphasized that the naming decision was made independently by the private sector and not related to the government's stance on Taiwan. The Chinese Embassy in Seoul also criticized the naming choice, stating it undermined the political foundation of Sino-Korean relations. The 16th Gwangju Biennale, a significant contemporary art exhibition, is scheduled to take place from September 5 to November 15.

Bias read (Center): The article presents both perspectives: the South Korean government's adherence to the 'One China' policy and the Chinese side's criticism of the naming decision. While the article acknowledges the controversy and quotes both parties, it does not show clear ideological leaning toward either side. It

The Korea HeraldIndependentProgressive4 days ago

Chinese organizers withdrew from the 16th Gwangju Biennale just two days before its opening, objecting to the use of the term 'Taiwan Pavilion' for an exhibition by Taiwan's National Taiwan Museum of Fine Arts. Initially listed under the museum's English acronym, NTMoFA, the exhibition was later renamed following pressure. The Chinese Pavilion team, led by curator Yuelai Ruan, argued that the name politicized the event. The Chinese Embassy criticized Seoul's handling of the issue, citing inconsistencies with the one-China policy. Relatedly, Guangzhou canceled a planned visit, and Zhoushan abandoned plans for a promotional pavilion at a future exhibition.

Bias read (Progressive): The article frames the dispute as a violation of the one-China policy by South Korea, which aligns with left-leaning perspectives that emphasize China's position. The focus on the Chinese Embassy's criticism and the implications for bilateral relations suggests a left-leaning framing, highlighting U