ON
← Back to feed
Ruto denies Sh104bn SHA technology contract
KE🏛️ PoliticsCenter5 days ago

Ruto denies Sh104bn SHA technology contract

President William Ruto denied allegations that the Kenyan government signed a Sh104 billion contract with Safaricom and Apeiro Limited for the Social Health Authority (SHA) technology system. Speaking at a presidential town hall during the National Health Summit, Ruto stated that the government had not purchased the technology outright but had engaged investors who own the equipment, with the state paying for services provided. He emphasized that the initiative involved designing a digital system to enhance transparency and accountability in SHA services. Digital Health Agency CEO Anthony Lenaiyara supported Ruto's stance, clarifying that SHA had not invested Sh104 billion in technology upgrades but had instead developed a digital infrastructure supporting universal health coverage. The system, described as a 'digital superhighway' with 43 components, aims to streamline claim processing and replace the outdated NHIF model reliant on physical file handling.

President William Ruto denied allegations that the government had signed a Sh104 billion contract for the Social Health Authority (SHA) technology system, calling the claims false during a presidential town hall at the National Health Summit in Nairobi. Speaking at the Kenyatta International Convention Centre (KICC), Ruto asserted that the government had not purchased the technology outright but had instead engaged private sector partners who owned the necessary equipment. The State, he said, would pay for the services provided rather than acquiring the technology directly. According to Ruto, the initiative involves designing a digital system aimed at enhancing transparency and accountability in the management of SHA services. He emphasized that every treatment and payment within the system would be traceable, ensuring greater oversight. This approach, he argued, differs significantly from previous methods used by the National Hospital Insurance Fund (NHIF), which relied on physical file-based claim processing. Digital Health Agency Chief Executive Anthony Lenaiyara supported Ruto’s position, stating that there was no evidence of a Sh104 billion investment in technology upgrades. Instead, Lenaiyara described the project as the creation of a “digital superhighway” consisting of 43 interconnected systems intended to support Universal Health Coverage. These systems, he noted, had already been implemented without requiring individual health facilities to acquire new devices. Lenaiyara further highlighted how the new technology had streamlined the processing and accountability of SHA claims. Under the old NHIF model, claims required manual handling, with physical documents being passed between multiple offices for verification and approval. The transition to a digital platform, he said, had significantly improved efficiency and reduced administrative burdens. In addition to addressing the SHA technology issue, Ruto also spoke about broader government efforts to address educational challenges. He announced that the state had allocated resources to construct 23,000 additional classrooms, aiming to alleviate the strain caused by insufficient learning spaces. This initiative, he said, reflected the administration’s commitment to improving access to quality education. The controversy surrounding the alleged Sh104 billion contract has sparked discussions among officials and stakeholders regarding the nature and scale of public spending in key sectors such as healthcare and education. While Ruto and Lenaiyara have categorically denied the existence of such a large-scale financial commitment, some analysts suggest that the confusion might stem from misinterpretations of funding allocations or contractual arrangements involving private entities. As the debate continues, the focus remains on clarifying the exact scope of the government’s involvement in the SHA technology project. With the implementation of the digital systems already underway, the emphasis appears to be shifting toward demonstrating their effectiveness in achieving the stated goals of transparency, accountability, and improved service delivery.

1 reports

The Standard logoThe StandardParty-alignedCenterFactual 85Objective 785 days ago
Ruto denies Sh104bn SHA technology contract

President William Ruto denied allegations that the Kenyan government signed a Sh104 billion contract with Safaricom and Apeiro Limited for the Social Health Authority (SHA) technology system. Speaking at a presidential town hall during the National Health Summit, Ruto stated that the government had not purchased the technology outright but had engaged investors who own the equipment, with the state paying for services provided. He emphasized that the initiative involved designing a digital system to enhance transparency and accountability in SHA services. Digital Health Agency CEO Anthony Lenaiyara supported Ruto's stance, clarifying that SHA had not invested Sh104 billion in technology upgrades but had instead developed a digital infrastructure supporting universal health coverage. The system, described as a 'digital superhighway' with 43 components, aims to streamline claim processing and replace the outdated NHIF model reliant on physical file handling.

Bias read (Center): The article presents statements from both President Ruto and Digital Health Agency CEO Anthony Lenaiyara denying the existence of a Sh104 billion contract. While the subject involves a potentially contentious government spending issue, the framing remains balanced, quoting both officials without明显的偏

Why factuality (85): The article reports President Ruto denying a Sh104 billion contract for SHA technology, citing official statements from Ruto and Digital Health Agency CEO Anthony Lenaiyara. It aligns with the cross-source consensus that there is no such contract, and presents both officials' positions without contr

Why objectivity (78): The article maintains a neutral tone, presenting both Ruto's and Lenaiyara's statements without apparent bias. However, it frames the denial as a rebuttal to 'controversial' claims, which may subtly imply skepticism toward the original allegations, introducing a slight editorial tilt.

How each side covered it

The same event, grouped by the political lean of the outlets covering it.

How each side covered it

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Covered around the world

The same event as reported in other countries.

Covered around the world

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Claims check

Key factual claims, and how many sources assert vs dispute each.

Claims check

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Keep the news honest.

ObjectiveNews is reader-funded and ad-free — we show you the bias instead of hiding it. Support independent journalism for €4/month.

Become a Supporter

Related stories