ON
← Back to feed
This kind of demagoguery is scandalous.
Slovenia🏛️ PoliticsCenteryesterday

This kind of demagoguery is scandalous.

Prime Minister Janez Janša addressed the National Assembly, explaining the distinction between binding and advisory referendums. He emphasized that the results of the October 11 advisory referendum on RTV contributions showed divided opinions, with roughly half supporting and half opposing the mandatory funding for national television. Janša noted that despite RTVS's involvement in the campaign without proper registration, the split result was seen as a defeat for the media organization. He criticized the current management of RTVS, stating that since its depoliticization by the previous government, financial issues arose due to amateurish handling of funds totaling 160 million euros annually. The new law proposed by the government aims to appoint a new leadership directly, but Janša argued that the existing legal framework had functioned adequately for nearly two decades. Deputy Speaker Asta Vrečko criticized Janša's rhetoric as scandalous, emphasizing that RTVS provides archival content, music production, broadcasting services, and contributes to national security infrastructure, thus requiring mandatory funding rather than voluntary contributions.

Prime Minister Janez Janša stated during a session of the National Assembly that legislative referendums require lawmakers to respect the will of the people, while consultative referendums provide guidance for legislative decisions. He emphasized that results from recent referendums, including the one on TV contributions held on October 11, would be considered accordingly. Janša noted that approximately half of voters supported one solution, while the other half backed another in the October 11 referendum on TV contributions. He stressed there was no decisive outcome, highlighting divided opinions on whether national television, which costs 160 million euros annually and employs more staff than the Slovenian military, deserves mandatory funding. He claimed the institution had participated improperly in the campaign without declaring it, adding that its bias was evident to all. He suggested the result could be seen as a defeat for the media organization. In response to comments by Asta Vrečko, leader of the Left parliamentary group, regarding the government’s draft law on RTVS, Janša argued that problems at RTVS began after the previous government depoliticized it and established a governing body responsible for both programming and financing. He criticized the current management, stating that amateurs overseeing operations worth 160 million euros from taxpayers' funds were failing to function effectively. He noted that prior to the new law adopted late in 2022, a version based on European models had operated successfully for nearly two decades. Vrečko countered that RTVS provides archival recordings, music production, broadcasting services, and contributes to national security infrastructure. She described Janša's stance as scandalous, emphasizing that RTVS cannot rely solely on voluntary contributions. The National Assembly will vote on whether to hold a debate on Janša’s response to her question by Tuesday within the framework of voting sessions. Dr. Žiga Turk, a professor and commentator, called the outcome of the referendum a massive loss of trust in RTVS, noting that half of the electorate, from relatively high turnout, voted to abolish the TV contribution, signaling deep skepticism toward a supposedly impartial, publicly funded television service.

How this report was made. Objective News wrote this report from 2 source articles, using AI-assisted synthesis under our methodology. It is our own text, not a copy of any single outlet. Read our methodology.

Responsible editor: Matej BašaSpotted an error? Report it

2 reports

Demokracija logoDemokracijaParty-alignedProgressiveFactual: no official source document/info detectedObjective 355 days ago
This is a huge mistrust of RTVS.

Dr. Žiga Turk, a professor, writer, and commentator, criticizes RTVS, Slovenia's public broadcaster, for a significant loss of public trust. He points out that half of the voters who participated in a referendum expressed support for abolishing the mandatory TV license fee, which he views as a major issue for a public service broadcaster meant to be impartial and accessible to all citizens. This outcome reflects widespread dissatisfaction with RTVS, suggesting a lack of confidence in its role and neutrality.

Bias read (Progressive): The article presents criticism of RTVS from Dr. Žiga Turk, a known progressive figure in Slovenian media and academia. His comments frame the referendum result as a 'great betrayal' by RTVS, implying that the institution has failed in its duty to serve the public interest. The framing emphasizes the

Why factuality: no official source document/info detected

Why objectivity (35): The article has a clear ideological slant, promoting the idea that RTVS is untrustworthy and biased. It includes a call to action encouraging donations to 'Demokracija,' which introduces a promotional element and undermines neutrality. The tone is overtly critical of RTVS without presenting countera

Reporter logoReporterIndependentConservativeyesterday
This kind of demagoguery is scandalous.

Prime Minister Janez Janša addressed the National Assembly, explaining the distinction between binding and advisory referendums. He emphasized that the results of the October 11 advisory referendum on RTV contributions showed divided opinions, with roughly half supporting and half opposing the mandatory funding for national television. Janša noted that despite RTVS's involvement in the campaign without proper registration, the split result was seen as a defeat for the media organization. He criticized the current management of RTVS, stating that since its depoliticization by the previous government, financial issues arose due to amateurish handling of funds totaling 160 million euros annually. The new law proposed by the government aims to appoint a new leadership directly, but Janša argued that the existing legal framework had functioned adequately for nearly two decades. Deputy Speaker Asta Vrečko criticized Janša's rhetoric as scandalous, emphasizing that RTVS provides archival content, music production, broadcasting services, and contributes to national security infrastructure, thus requiring mandatory funding rather than voluntary contributions.

Bias read (Conservative): The article frames Premier Janez Janša's comments on the RTVS referendum and governance as justified criticism of the institution's performance and management, while Deputy Speaker Asta Vrečko's response is portrayed as an overreaction. The language used by Janša emphasizes the need for direct state

How each side covered it

The same event, grouped by the political lean of the outlets covering it.

How each side covered it

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Covered around the world

The same event as reported in other countries.

Covered around the world

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Claims check

Key factual claims, and how many sources assert vs dispute each.

Claims check

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Keep the news honest.

ObjectiveNews is reader-funded and ad-free — we show you the bias instead of hiding it. Support independent journalism for €4/month.

Become a Supporter

Related stories