ON
← Back to feed
RTV has 163 million euros in revenues, but no money to pay salaries.
Slovenia🏛️ PoliticsProgressiveOverlooked by conservatives8 days ago

RTV has 163 million euros in revenues, but no money to pay salaries.

RTV Slovenija se sooča z likvidnostnimi težavami, kljub načrtovanim prihodkom v višini 163 milijonov evrov, od katerih je večina iz obveznega RTV-prispevka. Stroški dela redno zaposlenih presega 100 milijonov evrov, kar povzroča problem z zagotavljanjem plač. Stranka Resnica meni, da težava ni zgolj v pomanjkanju denarja, temveč v sistemu avtomatskega financiranja brez dovolj odgovornosti in nadzora. Predlaga ukinitev obveznega prispevka ali spremembo finančnega modela, da ne bi posegla v žepe ljudi. Referendum o tem bo 11. oktobra. Direktorat za zakladništvo je zmanjšal zadolžitev za 2,5 milijona evrov, kar je dodatno zaostrilo likvidnostne težave.

RTV Slovenia faces liquidity challenges despite having planned revenues of around €163 million for 2026, according to reports. The public broadcaster announced on August 14 that salaries would be paid, followed by honorariums four days later, even though the State Fund had approved a loan of just €9.5 million instead of the anticipated €12 million. This reduction came shortly before the scheduled disbursement, leaving RTV with significantly less liquid funds than expected. According to Resnica, the situation highlights concerns over the broadcaster’s financial management and the broader system enabling automatic funding without adequate accountability or oversight. The issue arose after the Treasury Directorate informed RTV Slovenia that the loan would be reduced by €2.5 million due to upcoming budget adjustments and uncertain availability of repayment sources for previous loans. RTV had initially expected to draw €12 million from the unified state fund account for 2026 based on prior agreements with the Ministry of Finance. However, this expectation was not met, leading to a shortfall in available liquidity. Resnica pointed out that RTV's revenue projections include approximately €109 million from mandatory contributions from citizens and additional funds from the national budget. Despite these figures, the organization’s operational costs alone exceed €100 million annually. The publication emphasized that the problem extends beyond mere financial shortfalls, suggesting systemic issues that allow automatic funding without sufficient responsibility, rationalization, or control over expenditures. As a result, they proposed legislation to abolish the mandatory RTV contribution, arguing that it should not automatically access citizens' funds regardless of performance outcomes. RTV Slovenia's leadership confirmed that all necessary measures have been taken to ensure full payment of salaries on August 14 and honorariums on August 18. They stated that these payments were prioritized, but acknowledged that the decision by the Treasury Directorate has created a liquidity gap of €2.5 million, affecting the ability to meet ongoing obligations. The board highlighted that RTV regularly takes loans before receiving contributions from the RTV fee, which is typically received monthly. This time, however, the Treasury Directorate failed to fulfill the previous agreement, potentially pushing RTV into reliance on commercial banks with higher interest rates. Natalija Gorščak, president of RTV Slovenia’s board, noted that the Treasury Directorate, under the Ministry of Finance, had for the first time not honored a prior agreement. She warned that this could push RTV into a position where it must rely on more expensive borrowing options, increasing overall debt costs. The board stressed that the government, as the institution’s founder, has yet to fully meet its legal obligations regarding co-financing of ethnic programs and music production, exceeding €15 million annually. Political responses have emerged following the scrutiny of RTV Slovenia’s financial situation. Resnica underscored that the core issue lies in the system allowing automatic funding without proper oversight, prompting their proposal to eliminate the mandatory RTV contribution. They argue that the move aims not to dismantle public broadcasting but to prevent automatic access to citizens’ funds irrespective of performance. A referendum on this issue is set for October 11, with voters deciding whether to support the abolition of the mandatory contribution. RTV Slovenia continues to emphasize its efforts to manage finances responsibly while acknowledging the need for further actions to address current liquidity constraints. The situation underscores the complexity of balancing public service obligations with financial sustainability in the context of evolving fiscal policies and regulatory frameworks.

Go to the primary sources (2)

The official sources this coverage is built on. Read them directly to bypass framing.

2 reports

Domovina logoDomovinaIndependentProgressiveFactual 85Objective 6011 days ago
The State Treasury will lend RTV Slovenia only 9.5 million, the salaries will nevertheless

RTV Slovenija je doživela likvidnostne težave, ker je državna zakladnica posodila le 9,5 milijona evrov namesto dogovorjenih 12 milijonov evrov. To je povzročilo zmanjkanje denarja za plače in honorarje, kljub temu pa RTV Slovenija še naprej računa na prihodke v višini 163 milijonov evrov. Medicinski centri Resni.ci so ocenili, da je problem ne racionalno poslovanje in avtomatsko financiranje brez dovolj nadzora. Prav tako so pripravili zakon o ukinitvi obveznega RTV-prispevka, kar bo predstavljeno na referendumu 11. oktobra.

Bias read (Progressive): Artikel kritizira sistem avtomatskega financiranja RTV Slovenije, kar kaže na kritiko vlade in političnega status kvota. Uporaba izraza 'samoumevnost', 'še več denarja' in 'nedostopnost do denarja' poudarja kritični pristop do političnega sistema. Zakon o ukinitvi obveznega RTV-prispevka je predstav

Why factuality (85): The article accurately reports the reduction of the loan from 12 million to 9.5 million euros by the state treasury, citing the official statement from RTV Slovenia's management. It also mentions the impact on liquidity and the planned payment of salaries. However, it adds an external claim from 'Re

Why objectivity (60): The article presents the situation but includes a biased comment from 'Resni.ca' suggesting RTV's 'nerational business practices,' which introduces a subjective viewpoint not supported by the primary source. The tone leans slightly toward criticism of RTV's management.

Nova24TV logoNova24TVParty-alignedProgressiveFactual 80Objective 708 days ago
RTV has 163 million euros in revenues, but no money to pay salaries.

RTV Slovenija se sooča z likvidnostnimi težavami, kljub načrtovanim prihodkom v višini 163 milijonov evrov, od katerih je večina iz obveznega RTV-prispevka. Stroški dela redno zaposlenih presega 100 milijonov evrov, kar povzroča problem z zagotavljanjem plač. Stranka Resnica meni, da težava ni zgolj v pomanjkanju denarja, temveč v sistemu avtomatskega financiranja brez dovolj odgovornosti in nadzora. Predlaga ukinitev obveznega prispevka ali spremembo finančnega modela, da ne bi posegla v žepe ljudi. Referendum o tem bo 11. oktobra. Direktorat za zakladništvo je zmanjšal zadolžitev za 2,5 milijona evrov, kar je dodatno zaostrilo likvidnostne težave.

Bias read (Progressive): Artikel podčrtava sistematsko pomanjkanje odgovornosti in racionalizacije v financiranju RTV, kar je pogosto povezano z levicami. Predlog ukinitev obveznega prispevka in poudarek na 'posegati v žepe ljudi' kažejo na levico. Sicer je artikel nekoliko neutralen v smislu faktskih številk, a njegova kri

Why factuality (80): The article provides detailed financial figures related to RTV Slovenia’s liquidity crisis, including projected revenues, costs, and funding sources. These numbers appear to be sourced from official reports and internal communications. The discussion of legal obligations and financial responsibiliti

Why objectivity (70): While the article presents factual data objectively, it also includes political commentary from the Resnica party, suggesting a shift in funding models. This introduces a slight ideological angle, though it is framed as policy discussion rather than outright advocacy. The tone remains professional d

How each side covered it

The same event, grouped by the political lean of the outlets covering it.

How each side covered it

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Covered around the world

The same event as reported in other countries.

Covered around the world

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Claims check

Key factual claims, and how many sources assert vs dispute each.

Claims check

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Keep the news honest.

ObjectiveNews is reader-funded and ad-free — we show you the bias instead of hiding it. Support independent journalism for €4/month.

Become a Supporter

Related stories