ON
← Back to feed
Row breaks out over National Portrait Gallery claims that Churchill starved Indians
United Kingdom🏛️ PoliticsConservative20 days ago

Row breaks out over National Portrait Gallery claims that Churchill starved Indians

The National Portrait Gallery faced criticism for an art installation that accused Sir Winston Churchill of deliberately causing mass starvation during the Bengal famine of 1943. Artist Helen Cammock's 40-minute video, titled 'Persistence,' claims Churchill used 'wilful' policies to starve the Indian population. Historian and former gallery trustee Lord Andrew Roberts condemned the exhibit, calling it a 'barefaced lie.' Over 50 members of the House of Lords, including Churchill's grandson, signed a protest against the display. Roberts argued that the famine was primarily caused by a natural ty

How each side covered it

The same event, grouped by the political lean of the outlets covering it.

How each side covered it

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and your personalized For You feed.

Become a Supporter

Covered around the world

The same event as reported in other countries.

Covered around the world

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and your personalized For You feed.

Become a Supporter

Claims check

Key factual claims, and how many sources assert vs dispute each.

Claims check

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and your personalized For You feed.

Become a Supporter

1 reports

The Independent logoThe IndependentIndependentConservativeFactual 85Objective 6520 days ago
Row breaks out over National Portrait Gallery claims that Churchill starved Indians

The National Portrait Gallery faced criticism for an art installation that accused Sir Winston Churchill of deliberately causing mass starvation during the Bengal famine of 1943. Artist Helen Cammock's 40-minute video, titled 'Persistence,' claims Churchill used 'wilful' policies to starve the Indian population. Historian and former gallery trustee Lord Andrew Roberts condemned the exhibit, calling it a 'barefaced lie.' Over 50 members of the House of Lords, including Churchill's grandson, signed a protest against the display. Roberts argued that the famine was primarily caused by a natural ty

Bias read (Conservative): The article presents the controversy around the National Portrait Gallery's exhibition, which criticizes Churchill for his role in the Bengal famine. While the article includes perspectives from critics of the exhibit, such as Lord Andrew Roberts, it does not provide balanced counterpoints or expert

Why these scores (Factual 85 · Objective 65): Factuality is high as the article accurately reports the controversy around the National Portrait Gallery's exhibit and includes quotes from historians and officials. However, the article presents the criticism against the exhibit without sufficient balance, giving more weight to the accusations rat

Keep the news honest.

ObjectiveNews is reader-funded and ad-free — we show you the bias instead of hiding it. Support independent journalism for €5/month.

Become a Supporter

Related stories