The FIAP partisans: "All of us are lacking in sensitivity"
The Italian Federation of Partisan Associations (Fiap) criticized the National Association of Partisans (Anpi) for lacking sensitivity during a commemoration event for victims of the Nazi round-up of Roman Jews in October 1943. The ceremony took place in the Jewish quarter of Rome, where 1,023 Jews were deported, with only 16 returning. Fiap’s vice president, Bianca Cimiotta Lami, stated that Anpi was unwelcome at the event due to its perceived alignment with anti-Israel sentiment, which has fueled antisemitism globally. Fiap denied claims that they left the event out of solidarity with Anpi, explaining that they proposed removing all flags to de-escalate tensions. They emphasized that Anpi should have shown more sensitivity by respecting the community’s request not to attend the ceremony, especially since it was held in a place of profound historical trauma for the Jewish community. Fiap noted ongoing tensions between Anpi and the Jewish community, exacerbated by Anpi’s association with pro-Pal groups and its stance on antisemitism.
Tensions erupted at Rome's former Jewish Ghetto during a ceremony marking the anniversary of the roundup of Jews. Members of the Roman Jewish community reportedly shouted insults and yelled at the delegation of the National Anti-Fascist Resistance Movement (Anpi). Phrases such as "You should go away," "Get out, get out," and "Be ashamed" were directed toward the group. According to Marina Pierlorenzi, president of the Anpi in Rome, the organization was attacked and told they were pro-Pal and could not remain in the square. The Anpi delegation was moved behind barriers, according to Pierlorenzi. Other associations showed solidarity with the Anpi, standing beside them. These included the Aned (National Association of Former Victims of Nazi Camps), the Fiap (Italian Federation of Partisan Associations), and the National Association of War Victims. Victor Fladlun, president of the Roman Jewish Community, had previously asked the Anpi not to attend the event. After tensions arose between some members of the community and the Anpi, Fladlun reiterated his reasons. He stated that the issue was one of modesty. He explained that the community had requested the Anpi not to participate out of respect. They have deep respect for the history of partisan resistance, which is their own history. Fladlun noted that 5 percent of Italian Jews fought in the resistance, compared to a national average ten times lower. He expressed deep hurt over seeing the Jewish brigade excluded from the April 25 procession and again deeply wounded by the Anpi’s tolerance toward pro-Pal squares. He believes the Anpi should not assume the role of a political party, should not engage in politics, but return to preserving the memory of the partisan struggle. Fladlun emphasized that the community is peaceful and respectful but stressed that today is a matter of modesty. When asked whether inviting the Anpi was an error by Rome's municipal authorities, Fladlun replied that October 16 is a profound day of mourning for the community, with direct relatives of those deported present, requiring sensitivity and respect. The incident occurred during a ceremony commemorating the anniversary of the roundup of Jews in Rome. The event took place at the former Jewish Ghetto, a historically significant site. The Anpi, representing the anti-fascist resistance movement, had been invited to participate in the commemoration. However, prior to the event, Fladlun had approached the Anpi requesting their absence due to concerns over respect and sensitivity surrounding the occasion. Fladlun highlighted the historical significance of the Jewish contribution to the resistance, noting the disproportionate involvement of Jews in the partisan movement. He criticized what he perceived as the Anpi's alignment with pro-Pal groups, suggesting this compromised its role as a memorial organization. Despite this, Fladlun clarified that the Jewish community opposes any form of violence, even verbal. He described the community as peaceful and respectful, emphasizing that the current situation was about maintaining dignity and respect during a solemn occasion. The Anpi delegation was relocated behind barriers after being confronted by members of the Jewish community. Other organizations supported the Anpi, showing solidarity with the group. This included the Aned, Fiap, and the National Association of War Victims. Their presence underscored the broader support for the Anpi despite the tensions. The event took place on October 16, a date marked by deep sorrow for the Jewish community, as it coincides with the anniversary of the roundup of Jews in Rome. Direct family members of those who were deported are present, adding to the emotional weight of the occasion. Fladlun emphasized the need for sensitivity and respect from organizers, highlighting the importance of acknowledging the pain and loss associated with this historical event.
The Italian Federation of Partisan Associations (Fiap) criticized the National Association of Partisans (Anpi) for lacking sensitivity during a commemoration event for victims of the Nazi round-up of Roman Jews in October 1943. The ceremony took place in the Jewish quarter of Rome, where 1,023 Jews were deported, with only 16 returning. Fiap’s vice president, Bianca Cimiotta Lami, stated that Anpi was unwelcome at the event due to its perceived alignment with anti-Israel sentiment, which has fueled antisemitism globally. Fiap denied claims that they left the event out of solidarity with Anpi, explaining that they proposed removing all flags to de-escalate tensions. They emphasized that Anpi should have shown more sensitivity by respecting the community’s request not to attend the ceremony, especially since it was held in a place of profound historical trauma for the Jewish community. Fiap noted ongoing tensions between Anpi and the Jewish community, exacerbated by Anpi’s association with pro-Pal groups and its stance on antisemitism.
Bias read (Center): The article presents both perspectives, Fiap criticizing Anpi for insensitivity and Anpi’s subsequent distancing from the national organization. It does not favor one side over the other but highlights the conflict and its underlying causes, such as antisemitism and political affiliations. The tone,措
Tensions arose at the former Jewish ghetto in Rome during a ceremony commemorating the roundup of Jews. Members of the Roman Jewish community shouted insults and demanded that the Anpi (National Anti-Fascist Resistance Association) delegation leave the area. The Anpi was moved behind barriers by organizers, who had previously asked them not to attend out of respect. The Jewish community expressed deep offense over the Anpi's perceived alignment with pro-Pal (likely referring to pro-Israel or pro-Palestinian groups) factions and emphasized that the Anpi should focus on preserving historical memory rather than engaging in politics. Several other associations supported the Anpi during the event.
Bias read (Progressive): The article highlights tensions between the Jewish community and the Anpi, which is historically associated with leftist anti-fascist resistance. The framing emphasizes the Jewish community’s criticism of the Anpi’s alleged political alignment and their call for the organization to return to its rem
In Rome's Jewish Ghetto, tensions arose during a ceremony commemorating the roundup of Jews. Members of the Roman Jewish community reportedly shouted at and insulted representatives from ANPI (National Anti-Fascist Resistance Organizations), telling them to leave and calling them shameful. The ANPI delegation was moved away from the celebration area behind barriers, according to provincial president Marina Pierlorenzi. She stated they were attacked and accused of being pro-fascist and unwelcome in the square. Earlier, Victor Fladlun, president of the Roman Jewish community, had asked ANPI not to participate. Other organizations, including ANED, FIAP, and the National Association of War Victims, supported ANPI and stood by their side.
Bias read (Center): The article reports on a conflict between the Jewish community and ANPI during a commemorative event. It presents both perspectives, Jewish community members opposing ANPI’s presence and ANPI defending their participation, without overtly favoring either side. The framing remains neutral, focusing on
Tensions arose in Rome's Jewish Ghetto, where members of Anpi, the Italian National Association of Partisans, faced insults and shouting from individuals opposing their presence. The president of the provincial Anpi chapter stated they were attacked and that those present did not want them in the square. This incident highlights ongoing tensions between historical commemoration groups and local communities or individuals who may oppose their activities.
Bias read (Center): The article reports on an event involving a political organization (Anpi) and community tensions without overtly favoring any side. It quotes directly from the Anpi representative but does not provide additional context or commentary that would indicate a clear ideological slant.
How each side covered it
The same event, grouped by the political lean of the outlets covering it.
progressive
center
conservative
★
How each side covered it
Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.
Italy
