Nova24TVParty-alignedConservative9 hr. agoDavčni svetovalec in lobist Rok Snežič je podal naznanitev sumu kaznivega dejanja zoper poslanca Gibanja Svoboda Roberta Goloba, saj meni, da bi njegova objava na Facebooku z 26. avgusta 2026 lahko izpolnjevala znake sramotitve tuje države po 164. členu Kazenskega zakonika. V objavi Golob kritizira Izrael, trdeč, da krade zemljo, uničuje nedolžna življenja in ruši domove. Snežič predlaga, da policija preveri, ali so podani zakonski znaki tega ali drugega kaznivega dejanja. Objava je nastala kot odziv na odločitev vlade Janeza Janše, da Slovenija ne podpira skupne izjave EU o obsodbi širitve izraelskih naselbin. Golob v svoji objavi vpraša Janšo, kdo mu daje pravico, da 'sramoti Slovenijo pred Evropo in svetom', in poudari, da so to dolgovi Janeza Janše na škodo Slovenije in Evrope. Snežič je pred naznanitvijo na policijo tudi poslal poziv veleposlankicam Izraela in ZDA, naj preučijo Golobovo politiko do Izraela, vojne v Gazi in Hamasa ter morebitne podlage za omejevalne ukrepe.
Bias read (Conservative): The article frames Robert Golob’s criticism of Israel as potentially illegal under Slovenia’s penal code, suggesting his speech could constitute defamation of a foreign state. The framing emphasizes legal action against Golob by a private individual, aligning with conservative or nationalist views.
Deadline Snowy with a new complaint by MP Robert Gobola on suspicion of committing a crimeOn August 26, 2026, Slovenian parliamentarian Robert Golob posted a video on Facebook in which he criticized Israel, accusing it of stealing land, destroying innocent lives, and demolishing homes. In response, Dr. Rok Snežič, a member of the Slovenian Parliament, filed a report with the General Police Authority, alleging that Golob’s actions may constitute the crime of insulting a foreign state under Article 164 of the Criminal Code of the Republic of Slovenia. The report calls for an investigation into whether Golob’s remarks meet the legal criteria for such a crime. The video includes Golob addressing former Prime Minister Janez Janša, criticizing his stance on a recent decision by the Slovenian government not to support a joint statement condemning Israeli plans for construction in the West Bank. Golob accused Janša of undermining Slovenia’s reputation internationally and claimed that the criticism was due to Janša’s personal interests rather than national concerns. The Slovenian government responded on social media, asserting that external policy is led by the government and that Slovenia’s interests will always take precedence.
Bias read (Progressive): The article frames the controversy around the alleged criminal offense of insulting a foreign state, emphasizing the political implications of Golob’s comments and linking them to broader international policy decisions. While the legal framework is presented neutrally, the emphasis on the potential罪
Slovenia
