Dy kandidatët e PDK-së për deputetë dorëzojnë ankesë në PZAP

Koha.netIndependentCenterFactual 85Objective 808 days ago

The Central Election Commission (KQZ) conducted a re-count of 185 polling stations across Kosovo to verify the accuracy of vote counts from the parliamentary elections held on July 7, 2026. The re-count did not uncover any significant irregularities that would justify extending the process to other polling stations. This contrasts with previous concerns raised after the December 2025 elections, where discrepancies led to the re-count of all polling stations and the arrest of hundreds of individuals involved in the voting process. According to KQZ spokesperson Valmir Elezi, the re-count revealed minimal differences, primarily due to the reclassification of invalid ballots into valid ones and human errors during the initial count. In 92% of cases, the difference was just one vote per candidate, while larger discrepancies were rare.

Bias read (Center): The article presents factual findings from the election commission's re-count without overtly favoring any political side. It reports on the results objectively, citing the spokesperson’s statements and emphasizing the lack of major irregularities. There is no clear ideological framing or biased phr

Why these scores (Factual 85 · Objective 80): The article accurately reports the results of the recount process, noting no serious irregularities found. It provides context from previous elections and mentions the commission’s findings. The tone remains neutral but slightly leans toward emphasizing the lack of issues, which may affect objectivi

RTKState / PublicCenterFactual 85Objective 707 days ago

Two candidates for parliament from the Democratic Party of Kosovo (PDK), Bekim Haxhiu and Qëndrim Kryeziu, have submitted complaints to the Election Complaints and Appeals Board (PZAP) regarding the final results of the July 7th elections, which were published by the Central Election Commission (KQZ). Haxhiu claims the published results are inaccurate and should not be certified in this form, citing errors in the initial vote-counting process, particularly in the PDK’s sample. He argues that these errors, though labeled as 'human mistakes' by KQZ, significantly impacted the final outcome, especially in the race for mandates. Kryeziu emphasizes that the law requires every vote to be counted accurately and fairly, asserting their request is based on the right to a proper electoral process. Previous complaints from these two candidates regarding a recount were rejected by PZAP and the Supreme Court. PZAP now has four days to respond to their new complaint, and if rejected, they can appeal to the Supreme Court, which has five days to issue a ruling. Only after these procedures are completed will KQZ be allowed to certify the election results.

Bias read (Center): The article presents both candidates’ concerns without overtly favoring either side. It reports their arguments and the previous rejections without taking a clear ideological stance. The framing remains balanced between the candidates’ claims and the institutions’ responses, avoiding loaded language

Why these scores (Factual 85 · Objective 70): This article mirrors the content of the second but adds procedural details about the timeline and legal steps. It maintains factual accuracy but has a somewhat formal tone that leans towards supporting the candidates’ position, affecting neutrality.

Koha.netIndependentCenterFactual 80Objective 657 days ago

Two candidates from Kosovo's Democratic Party, Bekim Haxhiu and Qëndrim Kryeziu, have filed complaints with the Electoral Dispute Panel (PZAP) regarding the final results of the June 7 elections announced by the Central Election Commission. They claim the results are inaccurate due to discrepancies identified during a recount of 5,201 votes, where 221 votes were incorrectly recorded in the initial registration. Haxhiu stated that similar issues occurred in the December 28 elections, where vote counts increased significantly after recounts. Both candidates argue that the law requires all votes to be counted accurately and that any errors, regardless of size, should not be overlooked. They are requesting a full recount to ensure the final results reflect the true voter count.

Bias read (Center): The article presents both sides of the dispute without overtly favoring one over the other. It quotes statements from the candidates who filed the complaint and includes their arguments about the accuracy of the election results. There is no clear indication of biased language or selective sourcing.

Why these scores (Factual 80 · Objective 65): The article presents the candidates’ complaints and their arguments against the election results, citing specific discrepancies. While factual, it frames the issue from the perspective of the candidates, introducing potential bias and emotional language.