ON
← Back to feed
Revealed: The ‘lovesick’ letters Trump aide Natalie Harp sent her boss
Australia🏛️ PoliticsProgressiveOverlooked by conservatives2 days ago

Revealed: The ‘lovesick’ letters Trump aide Natalie Harp sent her boss

Personal letters from Natalie Harp, former executive assistant to Donald Trump, have been disclosed, revealing an emotionally charged and professionally inappropriate relationship between the two. Written during or shortly after Harp's 2023 trip to the UK while Trump was out of office, the letters express deep concern over actions that may have upset Trump and a desire to maintain an intimate connection. The letters, published by author Michael Wolff and The Daily Beast, describe Harp as 'lovesick' and 'weird,' highlighting her emotional dependence on Trump and her struggle with professional boundaries. In one letter, Harp apologizes for panicking during a travel incident and expresses a longing for the personal rapport they once shared before her role as his assistant. Another letter references her burnout and frustration with the demands of her position, including interactions with individuals who seem to serve primarily as companions. These revelations have intensified scrutiny into the nature of their professional relationship.

Personal letters from Natalie Harp to her boss Donald Trump have been made public for the first time, offering a rare glimpse into the private dynamics between the former U.S. president and one of his senior aides. The two letters, written by Harp during or shortly after a 2023 trip to the United Kingdom, when Trump was out of office, reveal a deep emotional connection and a sense of personal vulnerability that has drawn significant attention. The documents, obtained by author Michael Wolff and shared through The Daily Beast, depict a relationship that has sparked controversy over its appropriateness within a professional context. In one of the letters, Harp apologizes to Trump for what she describes as an embarrassing moment during a golfing holiday in Scotland. She writes, “I was alone in the van outside Customs without my passport, I panicked, and I should have just called Secret Service instead of you.” She goes on to apologize for appearing awkward during the walk on the course and pleads for forgiveness for any other actions that might have caused him trouble. “I want things to always be right between us,” she writes. “I never want to bring you anything but joy. I’m sorry I lost my focus. You are all that matters to me. I don’t want to ever let you down. Thank you for being my Guardian and Protector in this Life.” The letter ends with the signature “With all my heart, Natalie.” In another, Harp reflects on the experience of traveling abroad and taking time away from her usual duties. She refers to her role as the “Human Printer”, a term describing her responsibility of preparing reading materials for Trump. “I didn’t have to be ‘Human Printer,’” she says, suggesting a desire for more autonomy. However, she admits that the extended period of reflection led to a slight decline in performance, which she acknowledges Trump may have noticed. “I had no idea how rapidly I was approaching burnout,” she writes, expressing frustration with the constant demands placed upon her. Harp also laments the lack of personal interaction with Trump, contrasting her past experiences with the current dynamic. “I miss the days when you used to call, during my Talkshow days, and we’d talk about everything and nothing,” she writes. “I want to get back to that synergy. We shouldn’t have to talk about work all the time!!” She further expresses a longing to reconnect with her former self and become the best version of herself to make Trump proud. “Please, when I fail, will you tell me?” she asks. “You have the absolute right to cuss me out, if need be, when I deserve it, because no one knows or cares about me more.” Wolff, who has long been known for his investigative journalism on the Trump administration, characterized the letters as “lovesick,” “submissive,” and “weird.” He emphasized that while he does not believe Harp was Trump’s romantic partner, the nature of their communication suggests an inappropriate level of intimacy for a workplace relationship. “The relationship here is not a relationship that should exist in a professional setting,” he stated on The Daily Beast’s Inside Trump’s Head podcast. “This ain’t normal.” Harp, 35, joined Trump’s team while he was out of office and played a key role in supporting his 2024 campaign. Her position as an executive assistant required close daily contact with the former president, raising questions about the boundaries of their interactions. While the exact extent of their personal relationship remains unclear, the letters suggest a level of emotional dependency that has drawn criticism from observers and legal experts alike. As the situation continues to unfold, the focus remains on the implications of such communications within the framework of professional conduct and ethical standards.

Go to the primary sources (2)

The official sources this coverage is built on. Read them directly to bypass framing.

2 reports

The Age logoThe AgeIndependentProgressiveFactual 75Objective 702 days ago
Revealed: The ‘lovesick’ letters Trump aide Natalie Harp sent her boss

Personal letters from Natalie Harp, former executive assistant to Donald Trump, have been disclosed, revealing an emotionally charged and potentially inappropriate relationship between the two. Written during or shortly after Harp's 2023 trip to the UK while Trump was out of office, the letters express deep concern over actions that may have upset Trump and a desire to maintain an intimate connection. The letters, published by author Michael Wolff and The Daily Beast, describe Harp as 'lovesick' and 'weird,' suggesting a problematic dynamic. In one letter, Harp apologizes for panicking during a travel incident and expresses a longing for the personal rapport they once shared before her role as a professional assistant. Another letter references her job responsibilities and emotional exhaustion, highlighting tensions between her personal feelings and professional duties.

Bias read (Progressive): The article frames the relationship between Harp and Trump through a lens that emphasizes the inappropriate nature of their personal connection, using emotive language such as 'lovesick' and 'weird.' It highlights the potential breach of professional boundaries, which aligns more closely with a left

Why factuality (75): The article accurately describes the publication of Natalie Harp's letters to Trump, citing Michael Wolff and The Daily Beast as sources. However, it incorrectly states that Trump was 'out of office' during the 2023 trip, which contradicts the primary source that implies he was still in power. Addit

Why objectivity (70): The article uses emotionally charged terms like 'lovesick' and 'weird' to describe the letters, which introduces bias. While it cites sources, the framing emphasizes the 'intimate relationship' aspect more than the broader national security concerns raised in the primary source.

The Sydney Morning Herald logoThe Sydney Morning HeraldIndependentProgressiveFactual 75Objective 702 days ago
Revealed: The ‘lovesick’ letters Trump aide Natalie Harp sent her boss

Personal letters from Natalie Harp, former executive assistant to Donald Trump, have been disclosed, revealing an emotionally charged and professionally inappropriate relationship between the two. Written during or shortly after Harp's 2023 trip to the UK while Trump was out of office, the letters express deep concern over actions that may have upset Trump and a desire to maintain an intimate connection. The letters, published by author Michael Wolff and The Daily Beast, describe Harp as 'lovesick' and 'weird,' highlighting her emotional dependence on Trump and her struggle with professional boundaries. In one letter, Harp apologizes for panicking during a travel incident and expresses a longing for the personal rapport they once shared before her role as his assistant. Another letter references her burnout and frustration with the demands of her position, including interactions with individuals who seem to serve primarily as companions. These revelations have intensified scrutiny into the nature of their professional relationship.

Bias read (Progressive): The article frames the relationship between Trump and Harp through a lens of professional impropriety and emotional dependency, emphasizing the inappropriate nature of their bond. It highlights Harp's emotional vulnerability and the potential ethical concerns surrounding her role, suggesting a left-

Why factuality (75): Like the previous article, this one accurately references the publication of Harp's letters through Michael Wolff and The Daily Beast. However, it repeats the error about Trump being 'out of office' in 2023 and includes unverified details such as Harp sleeping in a locker room, which are not present

Why objectivity (70): The article mirrors the tone of the first one, using similar biased language ('lovesick', 'weird') and focusing on the personal nature of the relationship rather than presenting a balanced view of the national security implications discussed in the primary source. This creates a one-sided narrative.

How each side covered it

The same event, grouped by the political lean of the outlets covering it.

How each side covered it

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Covered around the world

The same event as reported in other countries.

Covered around the world

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Claims check

Key factual claims, and how many sources assert vs dispute each.

Claims check

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Keep the news honest.

ObjectiveNews is reader-funded and ad-free — we show you the bias instead of hiding it. Support independent journalism for €4/month.

Become a Supporter

Related stories