Return of goods to markets in Gaza doesn’t mean people can afford them
The article highlights the ongoing economic hardship faced by families in Gaza, particularly focusing on Ghadeer Nassar and her seven children, who live in a makeshift home in a school. Despite some goods returning to Gaza's markets after months of shortages caused by Israel's blockade and conflict, many families still lack the financial means to purchase these essentials. Nassar's husband has no stable income and relies on temporary work, earning minimal amounts. To survive, Nassar has resorted to selling personal belongings like her wedding ring and her husband's phone, and engages in bartering to stretch limited resources. Shop owner Maher al-Khudari notes that while more goods are available, prices remain high, and many residents have depleted their savings and lost jobs. Customers are increasingly unable to afford basic necessities, leading to changes in purchasing behavior, such as buying smaller quantities of food and avoiding non-essential items.
Gaza City, Gaza Strip, Every day is a struggle for Ghadeer Nassar, who lives with her seven children in a small classroom converted into a home at the Remal Model School. Like many families in the territory, Nassar faces an ongoing battle to provide basic sustenance for her children, ranging in age from nine months to 14 years. While some goods have recently returned to Gaza’s markets following months of shortages caused by Israel's blockade and ongoing conflict, the reality for families like hers remains dire, money is scarce, and the ability to purchase even essentials is increasingly out of reach. Nassar’s husband, who previously relied on temporary work, has found himself without a stable income. His earnings fluctuate wildly, often amounting to just a few shekels per day. In response, Nassar has resorted to drastic measures, including selling her wedding ring and her husband’s phone, to ensure her children are fed. When cash is entirely absent, she turns to bartering, exchanging one kilogram of rice for four kilograms of lentils, a trade that allows her family to stretch their limited resources further. She admits she rarely buys what she wants, focusing instead on what she can afford. In Gaza City, shop owner Maher al-Khudari has observed a marked shift in purchasing behavior since the start of the war. Although more goods are now available in stores, prices remain prohibitively high due to supply chain disruptions and transportation costs. Most residents have depleted their savings and lost their jobs, leaving them unable to afford even the basics. Al-Khudari finds himself caught in a difficult position, as customers request to buy on credit, yet doing so risks his own financial stability. He explains that many people now purchase only minimal amounts of food, such as a few pieces of vegetables, while items like sweets have become rare indulgences. Al-Khudari noted that the crisis extends beyond mere affordability. Many individuals lack the minimum amount of money needed to buy even a loaf of bread. This reflects a broader pattern of economic hardship, with the United Nations reporting continued high levels of food insecurity in Gaza. According to the World Food Programme, although there has been an increase in both commercial and humanitarian supplies in recent weeks, the number of households struggling to access market goods due to unaffordability has also risen. The economic collapse in Gaza is evident in the statistics. The latest UN market data shows that the food consumer price index is 102 percent higher than pre-war levels. Palestinian economic expert Mohammed Abu Jiab highlighted that one of the most pressing issues affecting the Gaza economy is a severe shortage of cash liquidity. This scarcity has exacerbated the already dire conditions, forcing many residents to rely heavily on food aid. Without a clear path to recovery, the situation is unlikely to improve soon. Israel has not permitted large-scale reconstruction efforts, and the Palestinian enclave’s economy continues to stagnate. As a result, the majority of Gaza’s population, many of whom are internally displaced, remains dependent on external assistance for survival. The return of goods to markets does not equate to economic stability, nor does it guarantee that families like Nassar’s will soon find the means to sustain themselves. For now, the focus remains on ensuring that the most essential needs are met, even as the broader economic landscape continues to deteriorate.
2 reports
Al Jazeera EnglishState / PublicProgressiveFactual 85Objective 75yesterday
The article highlights the ongoing economic hardship faced by families in Gaza, particularly focusing on Ghadeer Nassar and her seven children, who live in a makeshift home in a school. Despite some goods returning to Gaza's markets after months of shortages caused by Israel's blockade and conflict, many families still lack the financial means to purchase these essentials. Nassar's husband has no stable income and relies on temporary work, earning minimal amounts. To survive, Nassar has resorted to selling personal belongings like her wedding ring and her husband's phone, and engages in bartering to stretch limited resources. Shop owner Maher al-Khudari notes that while more goods are available, prices remain high, and many residents have depleted their savings and lost jobs. Customers are increasingly unable to afford basic necessities, leading to changes in purchasing behavior, such as buying smaller quantities of food and avoiding non-essential items.
Bias read (Progressive): The article frames the situation as a result of Israel's actions, using terms like 'genocidal war' and emphasizes the humanitarian crisis caused by the blockade and conflict. The focus on the impact of Israeli policies on civilian life, along with the portrayal of Gazans struggling under these impos
Why factuality (85): The article reports on the situation of Ghadeer Nassar and her family in Gaza, describing the return of goods to markets following an Israeli blockade and war. It cites specific details such as the husband's unstable income, the sale of personal belongings, and bartering practices. While there is no
Why objectivity (75): The article presents a human interest story with emotional language, focusing on individual hardship. While it does not overtly take sides, the use of terms like 'genocidal war' introduces a strong ideological stance, which may influence reader perception. The framing emphasizes civilian suffering w
Mariam al-Najar, a 24-year-old student from Khan Younis in Gaza, received a scholarship offer from the University of Cassino and Southern Lazio in Italy, offering her a chance to pursue a master’s degree in economics and management. This represents a rare glimmer of hope amidst the ongoing crisis in Gaza. However, despite obtaining a visa, Mariam faces significant obstacles in traveling to Italy due to strict Israeli travel restrictions exacerbated by the US-Israeli conflict with Iran. These restrictions have severely limited the ability of Palestinian students to evacuate Gaza, with approximately 229 students having left between 2025 and 2026. Mariam expresses frustration over the lack of progress in securing her departure, highlighting the broader impact of the blockade on educational opportunities and the overall infrastructure in Gaza.
Bias read (Progressive): The article frames the travel restrictions imposed by Israel as part of a broader conflict involving the US and Iran, suggesting a geopolitical dimension to the humanitarian issue. It emphasizes the personal struggle of a Palestinian student against these barriers, which aligns with a narrative that
How each side covered it
The same event, grouped by the political lean of the outlets covering it.
progressive
center
conservative
★
How each side covered it
Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.