ON
← Back to feed
Residents push back against another plan for new pickleball courts
Australia🏛️ PoliticsCenter18 hr. ago

Residents push back against another plan for new pickleball courts

Residents in Lota, Brisbane, are protesting the planned installation of new pickleball courts at Cox Park, citing concerns over noise, safety, and disruption to nearby homes. The $250,000 project, supported by local LNP councillor Alex Givney, has drawn about 40 protesters who argue the location is unsuitable and that adequate consultation was lacking. Concerns include potential disturbances to residential areas, risks to children, and the replacement of existing netball courts that are heavily used by families. This marks the second such dispute in two months, following similar opposition to court plans in Holland Park West. Councillor Givney apologized for poor communication but confirmed the project will proceed despite community objections.

Residents in the Brisbane suburb of Lota have voiced strong opposition to plans for new pickleball courts at Cox Park, citing concerns over noise, safety, and disruption to their daily lives. The proposed facility, comprising a large concrete slab with painted lines marking four courts, is scheduled to be installed at the south end of the park starting Monday, July 27, at a cost of approximately $250,000. The project has sparked controversy among local residents, with around 40 individuals gathering at the park on Sunday to express their grievances. This is not the first time such a proposal has faced backlash in the Brisbane area. Just months prior, similar plans for pickleball courts in Holland Park West were halted due to community pushback. The current proposal is backed and funded by local Liberal National Party (LNP) representative Alex Givney, who has been vocal in supporting the initiative. Despite efforts to engage with residents, many claim the consultation process fell short of expectations. Alan McFadyen, a resident living adjacent to the park on Bethania Street, expressed his concerns regarding the location. He stated that while he does not oppose the idea of pickleball courts in the area, the choice of Cox Park seems ill-suited. McFadyen described the park as too small, swampy, and uncomfortably close to residential properties. His comments reflect a broader sentiment among neighbors who feel the site is unsuitable for such a facility. Registered nurse Vivienne Treagus, residing opposite the park on Richard Street, raised additional worries about the potential impact on her quality of life. She mentioned that the proximity of the courts to her home might interfere with her sleep, particularly during her work shifts. Treagus emphasized her fear of living under constant vigilance, worrying about the safety of children in the vicinity. Her concerns align with those of other residents who argue that the existing netball courts, often used by young children on bikes and scooters, should remain intact. Signs erected by several households near the park call for more thorough consultation before any construction begins. In emails obtained by local media, Givney apologized for not adequately communicating the plan to residents but maintained that the project would proceed regardless. She acknowledged that the replacement of the old netball courts with new ones had not been anticipated to cause such community concern. Givney noted that she had met with some residents earlier in the year, and the council claimed these discussions influenced the final design of the proposal. Susan Norman, a pickleball player affiliated with the Wynnum Pickleball Club, attended the Sunday meeting and defended the need for a dedicated court in the area. She highlighted that the sport is popular among older residents, with nearly half of local participants aged over 50. One club member is even approaching 90 years old. While acknowledging the concerns of some residents, Norman suggested that if the courts were located in her own backyard without proper consultation, she might share similar reservations. Members of the Wynnum Pickleball Club currently utilize a nearby school's facilities when available, underscoring the lack of adequate infrastructure in the region. Norman stressed that a permanent solution is essential for the community, despite the current location's drawbacks. Some residents have questioned whether the project complies with standard development requirements, pointing out that a formal application was not submitted. The Brisbane City Council responded by stating that the zoning classification for sports and recreational purposes allows for such projects without the need for a separate approval. The office of Lord Mayor Adrian Schrinner reiterated that the process had been transparent and that extensive dialogue with the community had taken place.

How each side covered it

The same event, grouped by the political lean of the outlets covering it.

How each side covered it

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and your personalized For You feed.

Become a Supporter

Covered around the world

The same event as reported in other countries.

Covered around the world

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and your personalized For You feed.

Become a Supporter

Claims check

Key factual claims, and how many sources assert vs dispute each.

Claims check

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and your personalized For You feed.

Become a Supporter

Go to the primary sources (2)

The official sources this coverage is built on. Read them directly to bypass framing.

2 reports

The Age logoThe AgeIndependentCenterFactual 75Objective 6018 hr. ago
Residents push back against another plan for new pickleball courts

Residents in Lota, Brisbane, have protested plans to build new pickleball courts at Cox Park, citing concerns about safety, noise, and disruption to their daily lives. The proposed facility, costing around $250,000, would replace existing netball courts at the park's southern end. About 40 residents attended a meeting to voice opposition, arguing the site is too small, swampy, and located too close to residential areas. Local LNP councillor Alex Givney, who supports and funds the project, acknowledged insufficient communication but stated the courts would proceed despite the backlash. This follows a similar dispute earlier in the year at another Brisbane suburb where plans were temporarily halted due to community resistance.

Bias read (Center): The article presents both resident concerns and the councillor's position without overtly favoring either side. It includes direct quotes from opposing perspectives and does not employ biased language or selective sourcing.

Why factuality (75): The article accurately describes the proposed pickleball court installation in Cox Park, including the cost, date, and number of residents involved. It references the broader trend of pickleball growth in Australia as mentioned in the primary source document. However, it does not provide detailed hi

Why objectivity (60): The article presents the residents' concerns objectively, quoting individuals directly. However, it lacks balance by focusing primarily on the negative aspects of the proposal without providing counterpoints such as potential benefits of the courts or official arguments supporting the project. The t

The Sydney Morning Herald logoThe Sydney Morning HeraldIndependentCenterFactual 75Objective 6018 hr. ago
Residents push back against another plan for new pickleball courts

Residents in Lota, Brisbane, are protesting the planned installation of new pickleball courts at Cox Park, citing concerns over noise, safety, and disruption to nearby homes. The $250,000 project, supported by local LNP councillor Alex Givney, has drawn about 40 protesters who argue the location is unsuitable and that adequate consultation was lacking. Concerns include potential disturbances to residential areas, risks to children, and the replacement of existing netball courts that are heavily used by families. This marks the second such dispute in two months, following similar opposition to court plans in Holland Park West. Councillor Givney apologized for poor communication but confirmed the project will proceed despite community objections.

Bias read (Center): While the issue involves local politics and community disputes, the article presents both resident concerns and council support without overtly favoring either side. The framing remains balanced, acknowledging the controversy without clear ideological leaning.

Why factuality (75): This article mirrors the content of the previous one, providing the same details about the proposed pickleball courts, resident protests, and the involvement of local representatives. It includes accurate information about the sport and the community reaction. Like the first article, it omits the hi

Why objectivity (60): Similar to the first article, this piece focuses on the residents' concerns and quotes them directly. While it maintains a neutral tone, it does not present alternative viewpoints or official justifications for the project. This lack of balance skews the narrative toward community opposition, reduci

Keep the news honest.

ObjectiveNews is reader-funded and ad-free — we show you the bias instead of hiding it. Support independent journalism for €5/month.

Become a Supporter

Related stories