Republicans accuse Smithsonian of sexualizing kids with 'woke' bondage and fetishist exhibits

Republicans accused the Smithsonian Institution of promoting harmful ideologies through its exhibits, claiming that content such as bondage imagery and references to transgender themes are sexualizing children and undermining traditional values. During a House Oversight and Government Reform Committee hearing on Tuesday, July 21, 2026, members of Congress confronted Anthea Hartig, the director of the National Museum of American History, over what they described as inappropriate and politically motivated displays. The allegations come amid a growing political push to scrutinize cultural institutions for perceived ideological bias. During the hearing, Rep. Nancy Mace of South Carolina criticized the museum for featuring images that she claimed depict “sexual fetishes” and promote “queer pedophilia.” She argued that these exhibits risk traumatizing young visitors and making them more susceptible to exploitation. Similarly, Rep. Brandon Gill of Texas questioned the museum's handling of historical narratives, particularly regarding a controversial exhibit linking Mickey Mouse to “vestiges of longstanding traditions of blackface minstrelsy.” He challenged Ms. Hartig on how the museum reconciled such claims with its educational mission. Ms. Hartig attempted to defend the museum’s approach, stating that it aimed to present historically documented truths rather than impose personal interpretations. She noted that while the exhibit on Mickey Mouse included references to blackface minstrelsy, it was not her institution’s creation but rather a resource used in 2019 and 2020. When pressed about the museum’s gift shop selling “Latina Power” merchandise, she avoided direct answers, emphasizing instead that the museum sought to represent all Americans without categorization. The hearing followed a White House report released earlier this year, which alleged that the Smithsonian had become a platform for liberal indoctrination. This report, which highlighted the museum’s inclusion of progressive perspectives in its exhibitions, has fueled bipartisan criticism. Some lawmakers argue that the museum is prioritizing ideological agendas over factual accuracy, thereby distorting public understanding of American history. Ms. Hartig, who has faced increasing scrutiny since taking office, struggled to provide clear responses to many of the committee’s questions. Her evasive answers and apparent discomfort raised concerns among some panelists. For instance, when asked to define a woman, she declined to answer directly, citing the museum’s commitment to representing diverse identities without rigid definitions. The controversy reflects a broader national debate over the role of museums in shaping public memory and identity. Critics argue that institutions should remain neutral and avoid promoting specific political viewpoints, especially when those views challenge long-standing societal norms. Supporters of the museum, however, contend that presenting a wide range of historical narratives, including those that highlight marginalized voices, is essential to fostering a comprehensive understanding of the past. As the hearing concluded, it became evident that the discussion would likely extend beyond this session. Lawmakers have signaled their intent to continue investigating the Smithsonian’s practices, potentially leading to further hearings or legislative action. Meanwhile, the museum faces mounting pressure to clarify its curatorial decisions and ensure that its exhibits align with both scholarly standards and public expectations. With the political climate increasingly polarized, the outcome of this dispute could influence how future generations engage with American history.