Time publishes the costs of Report: fara Pharaonic scholarships senders: False, we sue . Floridia (M5s): Serious act, they want to discredit the program
Il quotidiano Il Tempo, di proprietà del deputato della Lega Antonio Angelucci, ha pubblicato un documento interno della Rai che elencava i costi associati ai compensi dei giornalisti del programma Report. Secondo l'articolo, alcuni giornalisti avrebbero percepito stipendi elevati, tra cui nomi noti come Giulia Innocenzi, Giorgio Mottola e Bernardo Iovene. Tuttavia, i giornalisti del programma hanno smentito le accuse, affermando che i numeri erano distorti e che i costi menzionati rappresentavano le spese generali per la produzione dei servizi, non i compensi individuali. Hanno annunciato di intentare querela contro Il Tempo e altre testate che avessero ripreso le informazioni. Inoltre, hanno spiegato che i giornalisti lavorano con contratti autonomi e sostengono personalmente le spese di produzione. Daniele Capezzone, direttore di Il Tempo, ha definito la replica dei giornalisti 'scombiccherata', mentre il conduttore Sigfrido Ranucci ha criticato la diffusione del documento interno.
A controversy has erupted over alleged high salaries paid to journalists working on Italy’s investigative program Report, with conflicting claims emerging from both the media outlet and its contributors. The daily newspaper Il Tempo, owned by Lega MP Antonio Angelucci, published figures suggesting some reporters earn up to €300,000 annually. This revelation comes amid broader scrutiny of public broadcasting costs and has sparked accusations of defamation from the program's journalists, who have threatened legal action against the publication. The article, titled “Stipendi faraonici e spese incredibili: quanto ci costa Report,” was published in Il Tempo and cited internal documents from RAI, the Italian state broadcaster. According to the piece, certain journalists associated with Report received substantial sums, with some earning more than €200,000 and others reaching up to €300,000 per year. Names such as Giulia Innocenzi, Giorgio Mottola, and Bernardo Iovene were mentioned alongside these figures. The article suggested these amounts represented individual salaries rather than production costs. In response, the journalists and authors of Report issued a statement denying the accuracy of the figures. They claimed the numbers included expenses related to producing each episode, such as travel, equipment, and editing, and did not reflect individual salaries. Most of them work under self-employed contracts with RAI, they explained, meaning they bear the costs of their investigations themselves. As a result, the actual compensation paid to them would be significantly less than the total amounts cited in the article. The journalists further argued that Report is one of the least expensive programs in RAI’s prime time lineup, costing approximately €150,000 per episode, compared to other shows on the same network which can reach double that amount. They urged attention to be directed toward other RAI journalists who might be receiving higher compensation, particularly those favored by political interests and who have led unsuccessful programs in recent years. Daniele Capezzone, director of Il Tempo, dismissed the journalists’ denial as misleading and counterproductive. He pointed out that many of the individuals named in the article receive more than the annual allowance granted to the President of the Republic, a figure he described as merit-based. Capezzone emphasized that the discrepancies highlighted in the article should be addressed through formal inquiries and oversight committees, rather than being ignored. Roberto Natale, a RAI board member elected by the center-left, criticized the release of sensitive internal data, calling it a serious breach of confidentiality. He noted that even RAI administrators are not permitted access to such information, raising concerns about how the data became publicly available. Natale called for immediate intervention from RAI’s chief executive regarding this issue. Sigfrido Ranucci, host of Report and currently embroiled in another controversy involving the case of Lavitola, expressed concern over the leak of strategic internal documents. He announced plans to file a complaint with the RAI Ethics Committee against anyone within the organization who disclosed such confidential information. Meanwhile, RAI is reportedly considering replacing Report following recent controversies, including the suspension of summer episodes after an incident involving Ranucci. The network is seeking a new presenter for the show, aiming to find someone whose appointment will be widely accepted within the organization. This move highlights ongoing tensions within RAI as it navigates public scrutiny and internal challenges.
Il quotidiano Il Tempo, di proprietà del deputato della Lega Antonio Angelucci, ha pubblicato un documento interno della Rai che elencava i costi associati ai compensi dei giornalisti del programma Report. Secondo l'articolo, alcuni giornalisti avrebbero percepito stipendi elevati, tra cui nomi noti come Giulia Innocenzi, Giorgio Mottola e Bernardo Iovene. Tuttavia, i giornalisti del programma hanno smentito le accuse, affermando che i numeri erano distorti e che i costi menzionati rappresentavano le spese generali per la produzione dei servizi, non i compensi individuali. Hanno annunciato di intentare querela contro Il Tempo e altre testate che avessero ripreso le informazioni. Inoltre, hanno spiegato che i giornalisti lavorano con contratti autonomi e sostengono personalmente le spese di produzione. Daniele Capezzone, direttore di Il Tempo, ha definito la replica dei giornalisti 'scombiccherata', mentre il conduttore Sigfrido Ranucci ha criticato la diffusione del documento interno.
Bias read (Conservative): The article frames the controversy in a manner that aligns with right-wing narratives by highlighting potential mismanagement or excessive spending within a state-funded institution (Rai), which is often a point of contention in Italian politics. The framing emphasizes the alleged 'excessive pay' of
Why factuality (65): The article accurately reports the claim made by Il Tempo about high costs of Report, including specific figures and names. It also includes the response from Report’s journalists who dispute these claims, citing their contracts and production model. While there is some potential for bias, the facts
Why objectivity (55): The article presents both sides of the controversy, but has a slight leaning towards the Report journalists as it highlights their legal action and defends them. This introduces some editorializing despite the attempt at balance.
OpenIndependentCenterFactual 65Objective 556 days ago
The Italian news outlet 'Il Tempo' has published an article titled 'Stipendi faraonici e spese incredibili: quanto ci costa Report,' which claims that journalists working on the Rai program 'Report' receive extremely high salaries and incur significant expenses. In response, the reporters and correspondents of 'Report' have announced plans to file a lawsuit against 'Il Tempo,' accusing them of publishing false and misleading figures regarding their earnings. The journalists clarified that the reported amounts do not reflect individual salaries but rather the total costs incurred by the team for producing individual reports, including travel and production expenses. They emphasized that most 'Report' journalists work under self-employment contracts with Rai and bear these costs personally. The article also notes that 'Report' is one of the least expensive prime-time journalistic programs on Rai, costing around 150,000 euros per episode.
Bias read (Center): The article presents both sides of the dispute: the claim by 'Il Tempo' and the rebuttal by 'Report' journalists. It does not favor one side over the other, providing quotes and explanations from both parties without overtly biased language or selective sourcing.
Why factuality (65): This article mirrors the content of the previous one, presenting the same claims from Il Tempo and the rebuttal from Report’s journalists. It provides similar factual details and quotes, maintaining consistency with the cross-source consensus. No new information is added, but the facts remain clear.
Why objectivity (55): Similar to the previous article, this piece supports the position of Report’s journalists by highlighting their legal action and defending their stance. While it remains objective overall, there is a subtle editorial tilt toward the journalists’ perspective.
la RepubblicaIndependent🔒CenterFactual 45Objective 607 days ago
The director of in-depth reports at Rai, Paolo Corsini, is meeting with the authors of investigations to find a widely accepted replacement for the program 'Report.' The decision comes after the show faced challenges, including doubts within the editorial team regarding its direction and content. The goal is to ensure continuity while addressing concerns raised by the team. This move reflects internal discussions about maintaining the quality and relevance of investigative journalism on Rai.
Bias read (Center): The article discusses internal decisions within a national broadcaster regarding a journalistic program, which is a matter of public interest but does not present a clear ideological slant. The focus is on organizational changes rather than political positions or policies.
Why factuality (45): The article reports on internal discussions at Rai regarding the replacement of a director, but lacks specific details or sources. It mentions Paolo Corsini and the process of finding a new name, but does not provide evidence or quotes from primary sources. The lack of concrete information limits it
Why objectivity (60): The tone is neutral, reporting on an internal process without taking sides. However, it focuses more on the internal discussion rather than providing broader context, which slightly reduces objectivity.
How each side covered it
The same event, grouped by the political lean of the outlets covering it.
progressive
center
conservative
★
How each side covered it
Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.
Italy
