ON
← Back to feed
Renters blocked from installing £600 plug-in solar panels
United Kingdom🏛️ PoliticsCenter10 hr. ago

Renters blocked from installing £600 plug-in solar panels

The iPaper reports that landlords in the UK may legally block tenants from installing plug-in solar panel kits due to unclear planning rules. New regulations introduced by the government classify these solar kits as 'permitted development,' meaning they typically don't require planning permission. However, there are exceptions, such as installations on wooden walls, balconies, or timber-clad buildings, which do require approval. While the government encourages landlords to consider tenant requests favorably, the National Residential Landlords Association (NRLA) argues there is no clear guidance for landlords, who may cite safety concerns or insurance issues to deny installation. The solar kits, priced around £600, are marketed as an affordable option for renters, particularly those living in flats, but access remains contingent on landlord approval.

Renters in England face potential barriers to installing plug-in solar panels due to uncertainties surrounding planning rules and landlord approval, according to reports. The issue has sparked calls for clearer legal guidelines to enable tenants to reduce their energy costs significantly. The first batch of self-install solar kits became available last week for £699, following new government compliance standards. Retailers anticipate prices dropping below £600 as more companies begin offering these renewable energy solutions. A model priced at £599 is expected to launch in October. The initial compliant plug-in solar kits produced by UK-based company UKsol are intended for installation in gardens, rather than being attached to balconies. Balcony-specific models are anticipated to enter the market shortly, catering to renters living in apartments who previously found it difficult to benefit from conventional rooftop solar systems. However, a prominent housing association has already prohibited its tenants from installing such devices. Government officials have emphasized that the final decision regarding tenant applications for plug-in solar installations lies with the landlords. Officials have communicated to the National Residential Landlords Association (NRLA) that they expect these new solar kits to be viewed positively. Climate minister Katie White had previously indicated that the government might consider legal modifications if plug-in solar technology creates friction between tenants and landlords. However, energy minister Martin McCluskey recently stated that he does not foresee the necessity for additional legislation. Katie White visited the UKsol factory to inspect components of the new plug-in solar kits. Prices are projected to fall beneath £600 as more retailers stock these domestic renewable energy devices (Photo: DESNZ) Despite this, the NRLA informed The i Paper that there is currently no definitive guidance for landlords tasked with ensuring the safety and hazard-free status of their properties. Meera Chindooroy, the NRLA's deputy director of campaigns, stressed the urgency for the government to release this information promptly to facilitate discussions between tenants and landlords. Landlords may refuse requests citing insurance concerns, as per recent rule amendments effective from 27 August. These changes classify plug-in solar kits as "permitted development," typically exempt from requiring planning consent. Nevertheless, several exceptions exist. Planning permission is mandatory for installations on wooden walls, balconies, enclosures, or any section of the exterior of a block of flats clad in timber. Additionally, specific "protrusion" limitations apply, such as restrictions preventing panels from extending more than 0.4 meters beyond the wall surface, to avoid needing planning permission. Justin Dring, an expert at Independent Solar Consultants advising property owners, believes many landlords might still decline plug-in solar panels. He noted that landlords often raise insurance-related concerns, driven by uncertainties about whether tenants will install the devices correctly or adhere to planning regulations. Dring remarked to The i Paper that landlords might respond with, "You're not plugging that in on my property." When considering insurance, questions arise concerning liability if a panel detaches during a storm, damages neighboring property, or causes an electrical malfunction. This area remains largely uncharted, creating a complex and ambiguous scenario. Dring described the situation as a "minefield," noting that if complications arise, blame could be assigned to multiple parties. He suggested that it would be preferable for the government to establish comprehensive regulations outlining requirements and responsibilities.

Go to the primary sources (1)

The official sources this coverage is built on. Read them directly to bypass framing.

1 reports

iNews logoiNewsIndependentCenterFactual 85Objective 6510 hr. ago
Renters blocked from installing £600 plug-in solar panels

The iPaper reports that landlords in the UK may legally block tenants from installing plug-in solar panel kits due to unclear planning rules. New regulations introduced by the government classify these solar kits as 'permitted development,' meaning they typically don't require planning permission. However, there are exceptions, such as installations on wooden walls, balconies, or timber-clad buildings, which do require approval. While the government encourages landlords to consider tenant requests favorably, the National Residential Landlords Association (NRLA) argues there is no clear guidance for landlords, who may cite safety concerns or insurance issues to deny installation. The solar kits, priced around £600, are marketed as an affordable option for renters, particularly those living in flats, but access remains contingent on landlord approval.

Bias read (Center): The article presents a balanced view of the issue, highlighting both the government's encouragement for landlords to approve installations and the NRLA's criticism of lack of clarity. It does not overtly favor either side, though it notes the potential conflict between tenants seeking cost savings (

Why factuality (85): The article accurately reports on the availability of plug-in solar kits and mentions government actions regarding product compliance. It references the NRLA and quotes officials like Katie White and Martin McCluskey, aligning with the primary source document's context about permitted development ru

Why objectivity (65): The article presents information from multiple sources but frames the issue through the lens of tenant concerns and landlord responsibilities. It uses phrases like 'messy minefield' and 'struggled to benefit' which introduce some subjective language. The tone leans towards highlighting tenant challe

How each side covered it

The same event, grouped by the political lean of the outlets covering it.

How each side covered it

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Covered around the world

The same event as reported in other countries.

Covered around the world

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Claims check

Key factual claims, and how many sources assert vs dispute each.

Claims check

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Keep the news honest.

ObjectiveNews is reader-funded and ad-free — we show you the bias instead of hiding it. Support independent journalism for €4/month.

Become a Supporter

Related stories