The prosecution in the high-profile malversation case against Senator Ramon "Bong" Revilla Jr. is reportedly considering former Public Works and Highways Secretary Manuel Bonoan as its final witness. This development comes amid ongoing legal proceedings involving Revilla and several other individuals accused of involvement in a purported ghost project in Bulacan's Pandi town, allegedly involving misappropriation of public funds amounting to PHP 92.8 million.
According to Deputy Special Prosecutor Omar Sagadal of the Office of the Ombudsman, the prosecution has indicated that Bonoan might testify once he is removed from charges related to another case. Specifically, Bonoan remains under indictment in connection with a separate plunder case involving former Senator Jinggoy Estrada, where he faces accusations tied to a larger sum of PHP 573 million. The removal of Bonoan from this case would allow him to serve as a witness in Revilla's trial without conflict of interest.
Ombudsman Jesus Crispin Remulla highlighted the potential significance of Bonoan's testimony, stating that his institutional knowledge could assist the anti-graft body in proving multiple cases. As part of these preparations, state prosecutors have submitted a motion to the anti-graft court's Fifth Division requesting the amendment of case information to formally drop Bonoan from the Estrada-related case. This procedural move has resulted in the postponement of the arraignment proceedings originally scheduled for June 30, 2026, to July 28, 2026.
Bonoan's potential role as a witness in Revilla's case stems from prior testimonies given by other witnesses, including former DPWH Undersecretary Roberto Bernardo and Bernardo's driver, Vergel Niño Garcia. During Revilla and his co-accused's bail hearing, both Bernardo and Garcia referenced Bonoan's involvement in matters concerning budget allocation submissions to Congress. Bernardo stated that Bonoan was responsible for overseeing such allocations, while Garcia recounted delivering 55 boxes to Bonoan, later discovering that the contents were cash during an investigation into flood control projects. Bonoan has consistently denied these allegations.
The inclusion of Bonoan as a witness represents a significant step in the prosecution's strategy to build a robust case against Revilla and others implicated in the alleged misuse of public funds. His testimony could provide critical insights into the administrative processes within the DPWH and potentially corroborate claims about the nature and extent of financial irregularities linked to the Pandi town project. However, the success of this approach hinges on whether Bonoan can be successfully removed from the Estrada case and whether his testimony aligns with the evidence presented thus far.
As the legal process unfolds, the focus will remain on the evidentiary strength of the prosecution's case and how effectively Bonoan's testimony can be integrated into the narrative. The outcome of the arraignment on July 28 could influence the trajectory of the trial, particularly regarding the admissibility of Bonoan's statements and the subsequent implications for Revilla's defense. With the stakes high and public interest keenly following the developments, the coming weeks will likely see increased scrutiny of all aspects of the case, from procedural motions to the credibility of key witnesses.
4 reports
Philippine Daily InquirerIndependentCenterFactual 93Objective 885 days agoACT Teachers Rep. Antonio Tinio called on Ombudsman Jesus Crispin Remulla to reveal the terms of an agreement allowing former DPWH head Manuel Bonoan to testify as a state witness in exchange for immunity from plunder charges related to the flood control scandal. Tinio argued that Bonoan, as the president's alter ego in his role as DPWH secretary, was responsible for overseeing the agency's budget and was involved in kickbacks from overpriced flood control projects. He criticized the deal as potentially letting Bonoan off the hook unless it led to greater accountability for higher-level officials. Remulla stated that Bonoan would testify despite being a respondent in a plunder case, noting that prosecutors had filed a motion to dismiss the case. Tinio questioned whether Bonoan's testimony would implicate the president in a way similar to previous witnesses like Roberto Bernardo.
Bias read (Center): The article presents arguments from both Tinio, who criticizes the deal as insufficient for holding high-level officials accountable, and Remulla, who explains the legal rationale for Bonoan's testimony. The framing remains balanced, presenting both perspectives without overtly favoring one side.
Why these scores (Factual 93 · Objective 88): Factual with clear references to the legal proceedings and Tinio's concerns. More neutral compared to others, though it raises questions about the deal.
RapplerIndependentCenterFactual 92Objective 825 days agoManuel Bonoan, a former public works secretary facing corruption charges, has been transitioned from a defendant to a state witness in the flood control corruption investigation targeting ex-House Speaker Martin Romualdez. The Office of the Ombudsman decided to drop charges against Bonoan to leverage his insider knowledge of how lawmakers allegedly inserted unauthorized funds into the national budget via the Department of Public Works and Highways (DPWH). Assistant Ombudsman Mico Clavano stated that Bonoan voluntarily offered to cooperate with investigators, providing critical insights into the corruption scheme involving high-level politicians. This move strengthens the case against Romualdez, who was Speaker during the alleged misconduct. Bonoan's cooperation is seen as crucial due to his direct involvement in the DPWH budget, giving him unique insight into the planning and execution of the alleged fraud.
Bias read (Center): The article presents the situation objectively, focusing on the legal and investigative actions taken by the Office of the Ombudsman. It includes quotes from Assistant Ombudsman Mico Clavano and explains the rationale behind dropping charges against Bonoan to strengthen the case against Romualdez. S
Why these scores (Factual 92 · Objective 82): Well-informed with specific details about the timeline and nature of the case. Slightly biased by referring to Bonoan as 'the bigger fish.'
RapplerIndependentLeftFactual 90Objective 857 days ago [Inside the Newsroom] Properties, patterns keep leading back to Martin RomualdezRappler's investigation reveals a recurring pattern of property purchases and financial transactions linked to Martin Romualdez, a prominent Philippine politician and former House speaker. These transactions involve companies and individuals closely associated with Romualdez, such as his business partner Andrew Casiño and lawyer Jose Raulito Paras, who has ties to both Romualdez and his fraternity. The article highlights multiple high-value property acquisitions across different countries, including a $6.9 million home in Connecticut and a mansion in Spain, suggesting a consistent network of financial activity tied to Romualdez. Critics argue these connections are coincidental, but the article emphasizes the repeated involvement of the same individuals and structures, reinforcing the perceived links.
Bias read (Left): The article presents investigative findings that highlight potential financial improprieties and opaque transactions involving a high-profile political figure, using critical language and emphasizing patterns that suggest systemic issues. This framing aligns with a left-leaning perspective that is '
Why these scores (Factual 90 · Objective 85): Factual with details about the pumping stations and their status. Objective in presenting the situation without taking sides.
Philippine Daily InquirerIndependentCenterFactual 90Objective 804 days ago Bonoan to boost cases vs Romualdez, RevillaManuel Bonoan, a former secretary of the Department of Public Works and Highways (DPWH), is being positioned as a state witness in a corruption investigation targeting former House Speaker Martin Romualdez. The Office of the Ombudsman claims that Romualdez orchestrated a kickback scheme involving flood control projects worth approximately PHP 56 billion. Bonoan, who previously faced a plunder case, has been granted hospital arrest due to multiple health issues. The Ombudsman stated that Bonoan's firsthand knowledge of interactions between Romualdez and other officials makes him crucial to the case. Romualdez denies any wrongdoing, asserting that he did not have functional control over the budget process.
Bias read (Center): The article presents the allegations against Romualdez and the role of Bonoan as a state witness without overtly favoring either side. It includes quotes from both the Ombudsman and mentions Romualdez's denial of the allegations, providing a balanced account of the situation.
Why these scores (Factual 90 · Objective 80): Accurate with details about the case against Romualdez. Less neutral by highlighting the 'grand case of conspiracy' and implying Romualdez's guilt.
★
Keep the news honest.
ObjectiveNews is reader-funded and ad-free — we show you the bias instead of hiding it. Support independent journalism for €5/month.
Become a Supporter
PH
