SloveniaThe article discusses Mag. Remec's misunderstanding of the difference between the subject of public law and the economic society. Despite his active involvement in drafting a new law, he failed to allow landlords to independently determine cost-based rents. The law mandates rent increases based on the age of housing units. Remec views housing policy as part of the economy rather than social policy aimed at providing safe and affordable homes. He fails to recognize that the subject of public law (SS RS) has limited scope compared to the broader activities of the economic society, which SS RS is not. The law does not prescribe or define market or cost-based rents, so public landlords cannot unilaterally charge them. The law clearly states that public landlords must allocate public rental housing through public tenders for indefinite periods with non-profit rents according to the law.
Bias read (Center): The article presents a critique of Mag. Remec's understanding of housing policy and legal distinctions but does not exhibit clear ideological bias. It provides a balanced discussion of the differences between public law and economic society, without overtly favoring one side over the other.
