ON
← Back to feed
Reckless allegations against newly inducted Ministers in Tamil Nadu will affect their performance: Madras High Court
India🏛️ PoliticsCenter3 hr. ago

Reckless allegations against newly inducted Ministers in Tamil Nadu will affect their performance: Madras High Court

The Madras High Court ruled that reckless allegations made on social media against newly inducted ministers in Tamil Nadu could negatively impact their work performance. Justice D. Bharatha Chakravarthy addressed this issue during a hearing involving DMK sympathizer Vinoth Suriya Kumar, who falsely accused HR&CE Minister Ramesh of registering temple land under his relative's name. The court directed Kumar to submit an affidavit apologizing for the unverified claim and emphasized the need for fact-checking before posting online. While acknowledging the right to political criticism, the judge noted that the posts contained defamatory elements and allowed the minister to pursue legal action. The court also dismissed a First Information Report (FIR) against Kumar due to insufficient grounds.

1 reports

The Hindu logoThe HinduIndependentCenter3 hr. ago
Reckless allegations against newly inducted Ministers in Tamil Nadu will affect their performance: Madras High Court

The Madras High Court ruled that reckless allegations made on social media against newly inducted ministers in Tamil Nadu could negatively impact their work performance. Justice D. Bharatha Chakravarthy addressed this issue during a hearing involving DMK sympathizer Vinoth Suriya Kumar, who falsely accused HR&CE Minister Ramesh of registering temple land under his relative's name. The court directed Kumar to submit an affidavit apologizing for the unverified claim and emphasized the need for fact-checking before posting online. While acknowledging the right to political criticism, the judge noted that the posts contained defamatory elements and allowed the minister to pursue legal action. The court also dismissed a First Information Report (FIR) against Kumar due to insufficient grounds.

Bias read (Center): The article presents a balanced judicial perspective, emphasizing both the protection of free speech and the potential harm caused by unfounded allegations. It does not overtly favor either political parties or ideologies but focuses on the legal implications of the situation. The court's ruling is谳

How each side covered it

The same event, grouped by the political lean of the outlets covering it.

How each side covered it

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Covered around the world

The same event as reported in other countries.

Covered around the world

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Claims check

Key factual claims, and how many sources assert vs dispute each.

Claims check

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Keep the news honest.

ObjectiveNews is reader-funded and ad-free — we show you the bias instead of hiding it. Support independent journalism for €4/month.

Become a Supporter

Related stories