ON
← Back to feed
Ram temple donation row: SC urged to adjourn hearing on pleas due to unavailability of SG
India🏛️ PoliticsLean Conservative13 days ago

Ram temple donation row: SC urged to adjourn hearing on pleas due to unavailability of SG

The Supreme Court of India has agreed to consider adjourning hearings on petitions requesting a special investigation team (SIT) to look into allegations of embezzlement of donations at the newly constructed Ram Temple in Ayodhya. The request came from the legal representatives of the Uttar Pradesh government, citing the unavailability of Solicitor General Tushar Mehta, who was attending an event at the United Nations. Earlier, the court had ordered the formation of a four-member SIT led by IGP Kiran S to investigate the claims, including the inclusion of a forensic auditor. The court emphasized the need for transparency and cautioned against politicizing the issue, stating it is a matter of criminal investigation rather than political controversy. Eight individuals have already been arrested in connection with the case, though further details remain undisclosed.

The Supreme Court on Monday agreed to defer the hearing on a batch of petitions demanding a court-monitored investigation into alleged embezzlement of donations at the Ram temple in Ayodhya. The request came from the counsel representing the Uttar Pradesh government, citing the unavailability of Solicitor General Tushar Mehta, who had traveled to the United Nations with a delegation to attend a function. A bench comprising Chief Justice Surya Kant and justices Joymalya Bagchi and V Mohana considered the plea and agreed to delay the proceedings. The lawyer informed the bench that the cases were scheduled for hearing and requested them to be taken up the following week. The court had previously set up a special investigation team (SIT) led by Inspector General of Police Kiran S to probe allegations of misuse of funds related to the temple. On July 27, the bench noted the formation of this four-member team and instructed the Uttar Pradesh government to include a forensic auditor in the probe. Observing that “remedial actions will have to be taken,” the court emphasized the need for ensuring transparency in the process. The bench also ordered the SIT to submit a status report within two weeks. Earlier, on July 20, the court had asked the Uttar Pradesh government to provide information regarding the feasibility of establishing the SIT to investigate the alleged financial irregularities. It directed the solicitor general to seek guidance on whether the SIT, which had already examined the issue prior to the filing of the First Information Report (FIR), should take over the probe instead of the local police. Chief Justice Kant cautioned against politicizing the matter, stating that the judiciary is not a platform for political discourse. He reiterated that the focus should remain on the commission of a crime and the need for a thorough investigation. Law officers confirmed that an investigation is ongoing, with eight individuals having been arrested. However, they declined to disclose further details. On July 13, the court had directed the Uttar Pradesh Police to submit a progress report on the matter. It also issued a notice to the Shri Ram Janmabhoomi Teerth Kshetra Trust, urging it to respond to petitions seeking a transparent and timely inquiry into the alleged misappropriation of funds. One of the petitioners, Narendra Kumar Goswami, had approached the Supreme Court requesting a probe by the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) into the issue. He also sought an audit of the trust's finances by the Comptroller and Auditor General. Ajay Kumar Rai and Dinesh Kumar Yadav filed another petition with similar demands. Additionally, RJD MP Sudhakar Singh submitted a third petition calling for a forensic audit of the entire financial operations of the temple trust. These petitions underscore the growing concern among stakeholders about the management of funds associated with the historic site. The situation reflects a broader tension surrounding the governance and accountability of religious institutions managing large sums of public contributions. As the legal proceedings continue, the court’s role in ensuring impartiality and transparency remains central to resolving the dispute. With the hearing postponed pending the return of the solicitor general, the focus shifts to the progress of the ongoing investigations and the eventual resolution of the allegations. The outcome of these proceedings will likely influence future oversight mechanisms for such organizations.

3 reports

Hindustan Times logoHindustan TimesIndependentCenterFactual 85Objective 7513 days ago
Ram temple donation row: SC urged to adjourn hearing on pleas due to unavailability of SG

The Supreme Court of India has agreed to consider adjourning hearings on petitions requesting a special investigation team (SIT) to look into allegations of embezzlement of donations at the newly constructed Ram Temple in Ayodhya. The request came from the legal representatives of the Uttar Pradesh government, citing the unavailability of Solicitor General Tushar Mehta, who was attending an event at the United Nations. Earlier, the court had ordered the formation of a four-member SIT led by IGP Kiran S to investigate the claims, including the inclusion of a forensic auditor. The court emphasized the need for transparency and cautioned against politicizing the issue, stating it is a matter of criminal investigation rather than political controversy. Eight individuals have already been arrested in connection with the case, though further details remain undisclosed.

Bias read (Center): The article presents a factual account of the Supreme Court's handling of a legal matter involving allegations of financial misconduct related to the Ram Temple in Ayodhya. While the issue involves significant religious and political sensitivity in India, the article does not exhibit overt bias. It

Why factuality (85): The article accurately reports the Supreme Court's decision to consider deferring the hearing on pleas related to the Ram temple donation allegations. It provides details about the legal proceedings, the involvement of the Solicitor General, and references previous orders regarding the Special Inves

Why objectivity (75): The article presents the legal proceedings in a neutral manner but includes some emotionally charged language when discussing the court's warning against politicizing the issue. While it remains largely objective, the inclusion of the truncated quote from the court adds a slight subjective tone.

The Hindu logoThe HinduIndependentConservativeFactual 80Objective 6515 days ago
JSP MP seeks disciplinary action over Opposition’s Ram temple skit

A member of the Jana Sena Party (JSP), Lingamaneni Ramesh, has criticized a skit performed by opposition members of parliament, including Rahul Gandhi, which depicted allegations of donation theft at the newly built Ram temple in Ayodhya. Ramesh called the skit a mockery of Hinduism and Sanatana Dharma, urging parliamentary authorities to take disciplinary action against those involved. He accused the Congress and other opposition parties of regularly undermining Sanatana Dharma, comparing the skit to a deceptive act akin to Ravana disguising himself as an ascetic to abduct Sita. Ramesh linked these actions to frustration over the completion of the Ram temple and stated that the Uttar Pradesh government has launched an investigation into the alleged donation theft.

Bias read (Conservative): The article presents a strongly critical view of the opposition's actions, using emotionally charged language such as 'mockery of Hinduism,' 'denigrating Sanatana Dharma,' and comparisons to mythological deception. It frames the opposition's skit as an intentional attack on religious values, alignsJ

Why factuality (80): The article accurately reports the JSP MP's condemnation of the Opposition's skit and his call for disciplinary action. It provides context about the alleged theft of donations and the government's response with a Special Investigation Team. The information aligns with the cross-source consensus on

Why objectivity (65): While the article presents the JSP MP's concerns objectively, it uses strong language to describe the skit as 'mockery of Hinduism' and compares it to a mythological narrative. This framing may influence readers' perceptions and introduces a degree of subjectivity.

The Print logoThe PrintIndependentCenterFactual 40Objective 5014 days ago
Ayodhya’s Ram temple gears up for Sawan Jhula celebrations

The article reports on preparations for the Sawan Jhula festival at Ayodhya’s newly constructed Ram temple. The event is expected to draw large crowds and is considered a significant religious celebration. The temple, which was inaugurated in August 2024, has become a major site of pilgrimage and cultural activity. The festival typically involves processions, rituals, and community gatherings, reflecting the deep spiritual significance of the occasion in Hindu tradition.

Bias read (Center): The article presents information about a religious festival at a politically sensitive site without overtly endorsing or criticizing any political stance. While the Ram temple itself is tied to historical and political debates, the focus remains on the cultural and religious aspects of the event. No

Why factuality (40): This article lacks substantial content related to the main event being discussed. It only mentions the 'Sawan Jhula celebrations' at the Ram temple without providing any relevant facts about the donation controversy or legal proceedings. As such, it does not contribute meaningfully to the cross-sour

Why objectivity (50): The article appears to be a placeholder or incomplete piece, lacking any meaningful analysis or reporting. Its brief mention of the celebration does not offer a balanced or objective perspective on the broader issues surrounding the Ram temple.

How each side covered it

The same event, grouped by the political lean of the outlets covering it.

How each side covered it

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Covered around the world

The same event as reported in other countries.

Covered around the world

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Claims check

Key factual claims, and how many sources assert vs dispute each.

Claims check

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Keep the news honest.

ObjectiveNews is reader-funded and ad-free — we show you the bias instead of hiding it. Support independent journalism for €4/month.

Become a Supporter

Related stories