ON
← Back to feed
Rajasthan Cabinet approves UCC bill mandating registration of live-in relationships, polygamy ban
India🏛️ PoliticsCenter8 days ago

Rajasthan Cabinet approves UCC bill mandating registration of live-in relationships, polygamy ban

The Rajasthan Cabinet has approved a bill aimed at implementing a Uniform Civil Code (UCC), which seeks to replace religion-based personal laws with a unified legal framework for marriage, divorce, succession, and adoption. Key provisions include banning polygamy, requiring the registration of marriages and divorces within 60 days, and mandating the registration of live-in relationships. The UCC will not apply to Scheduled Tribes and communities with constitutionally protected customary rights. The bill follows recommendations from a high-level committee led by former Supreme Court Justice Ranjana Prakash Desai, who has previously worked on similar legislation in other states. Rajasthan becomes the fifth BJP-ruled state to advance toward implementing a UCC, following Uttarakhand, Gujarat, and Assam.

Rajasthan's Chief Minister Bhajanlal Sharma announced plans to introduce the Uniform Civil Code (UCC) in the state, marking a significant step toward implementing a common legal framework for personal matters such as marriage, divorce, and inheritance. The announcement comes as the state legislature prepares to convene for its monsoon session starting August 20. According to reports, the Rajasthan Cabinet has already approved a bill that mandates the registration of live-in relationships and prohibits polygamy. The proposed UCC aims to replace existing religious-based personal laws with a uniform set of regulations applicable to all citizens. This initiative follows the recommendations of a high-level committee chaired by former Supreme Court Justice Ranjana Prakash Desai. The committee was tasked with drafting the legislative framework for the UCC, a task previously undertaken in states such as Madhya Pradesh, Uttarakhand, Gujarat, and Maharashtra. The Rajasthan bill, which mirrors these efforts, seeks to ensure equal property rights for sons and daughters across all faiths, regardless of their specific religious traditions. Under the new proposal, individuals must register their marriages and divorces within 60 days, ensuring transparency and legal recognition. Live-in relationships will also require either formal registration or written notification, bringing them under the purview of state law. These measures aim to standardize procedures and eliminate disparities arising from varying religious customs. The UCC does not apply to Scheduled Tribes or other communities whose customary practices are safeguarded under constitutional provisions. Minister Jogaram Patel clarified that the bill respects the cultural and social norms of these groups while promoting broader legal equity. The decision to introduce the UCC coincides with the impending model code of conduct for the upcoming panchayat and local body elections, suggesting a strategic timing to address legal reforms alongside electoral processes. The Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) has long advocated for a common civil code, viewing it as essential for national integration and gender equality. Several BJP-led states have taken steps toward this goal. For instance, Uttarakhand became the first post-independence state to implement the UCC in January 2025, followed by Gujarat in March 2025, despite opposition protests. Goa has maintained a uniform civil code since adopting the Portuguese Civil Code in 1867. Recently, the Assam Assembly passed a similar bill, though the Opposition called for further scrutiny before final approval. Supporters argue that the UCC promotes fairness and reduces discrimination by applying consistent standards across all communities. Critics, however, raise concerns over potential encroachment on religious freedoms and the erosion of traditional practices. Some activists highlight the need for inclusive dialogue and public consultation to ensure the UCC aligns with diverse societal values. As the Rajasthan government moves forward with its plan, the focus will shift to legislative debates and public discourse. The introduction of the UCC represents a pivotal moment in India's ongoing debate over personal laws and national identity. With multiple states advancing similar initiatives, the path toward a unified legal framework remains both ambitious and contentious. The next phase will involve detailed discussions in the state assembly, setting the stage for a broader national conversation on legal reform.

Go to the primary sources (1)

The official sources this coverage is built on. Read them directly to bypass framing.

2 reports

Scroll.in logoScroll.inIndependentConservativeFactual 85Objective 8010 days ago
Rajasthan Cabinet approves UCC bill mandating registration of live-in relationships, polygamy ban

The Rajasthan Cabinet has approved a bill aimed at implementing a Uniform Civil Code (UCC), which seeks to replace religion-based personal laws with a unified legal framework for marriage, divorce, succession, and adoption. Key provisions include banning polygamy, requiring the registration of marriages and divorces within 60 days, and mandating the registration of live-in relationships. The UCC will not apply to Scheduled Tribes and communities with constitutionally protected customary rights. The bill follows recommendations from a high-level committee led by former Supreme Court Justice Ranjana Prakash Desai, who has previously worked on similar legislation in other states. Rajasthan becomes the fifth BJP-ruled state to advance toward implementing a UCC, following Uttarakhand, Gujarat, and Assam.

Bias read (Conservative): The article frames the implementation of the Uniform Civil Code as part of the BJP's broader agenda, highlighting its alignment with the ruling party's goals. It emphasizes the progressive nature of the UCC while noting opposition concerns, but does not present balanced perspectives from critics. Ph

Why factuality (85): The article accurately reports the approval of the UCC bill by Rajasthan Cabinet, mentioning key details like the ban on polygamy, mandatory registration of marriages/divorces, and the inclusion of live-in relationship provisions. It cites The Hindu as a source but omits some contextual details like

Why objectivity (80): The article presents the information neutrally overall, though it uses terms like 'mandating registration of live-in relationships' which could imply a value judgment. It avoids overtly biased language but focuses more on the policy aspects than on the controversy surrounding it.

The Print logoThe PrintIndependentProgressiveFactual 70Objective 658 days ago
Rajasthan to introduce Uniform Civil Code, says CM Bhajanlal Sharma

The article reports that Rajasthan Chief Minister Bhajanlal Sharma announced plans to introduce a Uniform Civil Code in the state. This code would standardize personal laws governing marriage, inheritance, and other family matters across different religious communities. The announcement comes amid ongoing discussions about legal uniformity and gender equality in India. While the proposal aims to promote fairness and reduce disparities among various religious groups, it has sparked debates over constitutional validity and cultural sensitivity.

Bias read (Progressive): The article frames the introduction of a Uniform Civil Code as a progressive step toward gender equality and legal uniformity, aligning with left-leaning perspectives that emphasize social reform and secularism. It highlights the potential benefits of reducing religious disparities but does not give

Why factuality (70): The article mentions the UCC approval but lacks specific details about its provisions, such as the ban on polygamy, mandatory registration timelines, or protections for live-in relationships. It does not cite any sources and provides minimal context compared to the primary document. This lack of det

Why objectivity (65): The title suggests a direct statement from the CM, but the content is vague and lacks depth. The article appears to be incomplete or truncated, offering little analysis or context. Its brevity makes it difficult to assess neutrality definitively, but the limited content shows no clear bias.

How each side covered it

The same event, grouped by the political lean of the outlets covering it.

How each side covered it

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Covered around the world

The same event as reported in other countries.

Covered around the world

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Claims check

Key factual claims, and how many sources assert vs dispute each.

Claims check

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Keep the news honest.

ObjectiveNews is reader-funded and ad-free — we show you the bias instead of hiding it. Support independent journalism for €4/month.

Become a Supporter

Related stories