ON
← Back to feed
Radar image that flooded the Web: 'Radar error'
Slovenia🏛️ Politics11 days ago

Radar image that flooded the Web: 'Radar error'

A radar image showing unusual swirling patterns of thunderstorms has sparked online interest in Slovenia and neighboring regions. The phenomenon was observed around 14:30 over Italy, Slovenia, and the Istrian coast of Croatia. Social media users shared images of the radar display, which showed an unfamiliar pattern of storm cloud movement. The Slovenian Environment Agency (Arso) explained that these patterns are not actual rainfall but rather a data error originating from the Italian radar station Fossalon. According to Arso, the issue likely stems from measurement or data processing errors. They further clarified that concentric circles often seen on radar images are caused by the radar’s rotating antenna measuring precipitation at different altitudes, leading to enhanced reflections along specific atmospheric layers.

On August 11, 2026, unusual radar images captured over Italy, Slovenia, and Croatia sparked widespread speculation online. The images showed concentric circles resembling mysterious atmospheric disturbances, leading users to share them widely on social media platforms. At first glance, the patterns appeared to suggest some kind of extraordinary weather phenomenon, prompting theories ranging from alien activity to deliberate weather manipulation. However, experts quickly clarified that the images were not indicative of real rainfall or any supernatural occurrence, but rather a technical anomaly in the data collected by radar systems. The strange imagery was first noticed around 2:30 PM local time by users on the popular weather tracking platform Windy. These images depicted swirling cloud formations that seemed to pulse with an almost otherworldly rhythm. The visual effect led many to speculate whether the phenomenon could be linked to extraterrestrial activity or even artificial intervention in weather patterns. Social media users flooded discussion threads with questions, some suggesting that the pattern might indicate hidden technology or even a covert experiment conducted by unknown entities. In response to public concern, the Slovenian Environment Agency (Arso) issued a statement clarifying the situation. According to their explanation, the radar images did not represent actual precipitation but instead reflected a technical error originating from the Italian radar station Fossalon. The agency noted that while the exact cause of the anomaly remained unclear, it was likely related to issues during data collection or processing. They emphasized that such anomalies are not uncommon and often result from complex interactions between radar measurements and atmospheric conditions. The radar system operates by using an antenna that rotates around a vertical axis, measuring precipitation at different altitudes above each ground point. A computer then processes these readings to determine the maximum value and display it on the final radar image. This means that the displayed image does not show rain at ground level, but rather conditions occurring higher in the atmosphere. In this case, the unusual circular patterns were caused by layered precipitation interacting with temperature changes in the air. Experts explained that the formation of these concentric rings can be attributed to the melting of snow within specific layers of the atmosphere. When snow begins to melt at a certain altitude, it creates a stronger radar echo due to increased reflectivity. As the radar beam scans through these layers at varying angles, the echoes appear as concentric circles on the ground. This optical illusion occurs because the beams intersect the melting layer at different distances, creating the appearance of circular patterns. This explanation aligns with previous reports from meteorological agencies, which have occasionally addressed similar phenomena. Such occurrences, though rare, are well understood within the field of meteorology and are typically resolved through further analysis of radar data. While the initial reaction from the public was one of confusion and curiosity, the scientific community has consistently worked to demystify such events through clear communication and detailed explanations. As of now, the issue remains under investigation, with ongoing efforts to fully understand the nature of the anomaly. While the immediate cause appears to be a technical glitch, the broader implications of such events continue to be studied by researchers. For now, the focus remains on ensuring accurate interpretation of radar data and maintaining public trust in meteorological services.

Go to the primary sources (3)

The official sources this coverage is built on. Read them directly to bypass framing.

3 reports

N1 Slovenija logoN1 SlovenijaIndependentCenterFactual 85Objective 8011 days ago
What was going on over Slovenia?

Na družbenih omrežjih so uporabniki prikazali nenavadno radarsko sliko padavin, ki prikazuje vrtinčenje oblakov nad Italijo, Slovenijo in Hrvaško. To je sprožilo številne teorije in vprašanja o manipulaciji vremena. Agencija RS za okolje (Arso) je odgovorila, da gre za motnjo v radarskih podatkih, ki izvira iz radarja Fossalon v Italiji. Obrazložila je, da radar meri padavine na različnih višinah in da ojačan radarski odboj nastane zaradi taljenja snega. Arso je dodala, da so projekcije maksimalnih odmevov na tla oblike koncentričnih krogov zaradi različnih nagnjenih snopov.

Bias read (Center): The article discusses a technical explanation related to radar data anomalies and does not involve any political controversy or ideological framing. The focus is purely on scientific interpretation and clarification provided by an environmental agency, making it apolitical in nature.

Why factuality (85): This article provides a clear and concise explanation based on the response from Arso, confirming the radar anomaly was due to a data error from the Italian radar Fossalon. It accurately summarizes the technical process of how radar works and explains the phenomenon without embellishment. The inform

Why objectivity (80): The article maintains a neutral tone, presenting facts and expert responses without emotional language or speculative framing. It focuses on delivering the explanation from Arso without promoting any particular viewpoint or encouraging further speculation.

24ur (POP TV) logo24ur (POP TV)IndependentCenterFactual 80Objective 7512 days ago
Radar image that flooded the Web: 'Radar error'

A radar image showing unusual swirling patterns of thunderstorms has sparked online interest in Slovenia and neighboring regions. The phenomenon was observed around 14:30 over Italy, Slovenia, and the Istrian coast of Croatia. Social media users shared images of the radar display, which showed an unfamiliar pattern of storm cloud movement. The Slovenian Environment Agency (Arso) explained that these patterns are not actual rainfall but rather a data error originating from the Italian radar station Fossalon. According to Arso, the issue likely stems from measurement or data processing errors. They further clarified that concentric circles often seen on radar images are caused by the radar’s rotating antenna measuring precipitation at different altitudes, leading to enhanced reflections along specific atmospheric layers.

Bias read (Center): The article provides a neutral explanation of a technical phenomenon related to radar data anomalies. It cites the Slovenian Environment Agency (Arso) and explains the scientific background without taking a stance or emphasizing any particular perspective. There is no indication of ideological bias,

Why factuality (80): The article confirms the radar anomaly was due to a data error from the Italian radar Fossalon, as reported by Arso. It includes technical details about how radar operates and explains the phenomenon without adding unnecessary speculation. The information is consistent with the cross-source consensu

Why objectivity (75): While the article remains largely objective, it uses phrasing such as 'vrtinčenje nevihtnih oblakov' (whirling thunderclouds) which might imply a more dramatic interpretation than strictly factual. It also mentions the public reaction and theories, which could be seen as giving more weight to the my

Večer logoVečerIndependent🔒CenterFactual 75Objective 6511 days ago
Mysterious footage of storm clouds over Croatia and Slovenia has triggered a wave of speculation

On August 11, 2026, users noticed unusual concentric circles on a radar image over Italy, Slovenia, and Croatia, sparking widespread speculation online. The images resembled extraterrestrial phenomena or weather manipulation, leading to theories about alien visits or artificial interference. However, experts quickly explained that the circles were not actual precipitation but a data error from the Italian radar Fossalon. The anomaly occurred due to snow melting at a specific altitude, causing stronger radar reflections. These reflections appeared as concentric circles when projected onto the ground. The Slovenian Environment Agency clarified the phenomenon was natural and based on technical issues with radar data processing.

Bias read (Center): The article discusses a scientific explanation for a meteorological phenomenon, focusing on radar technology and atmospheric conditions. There is no political framing, controversy, or ideological emphasis. The content remains strictly informative and neutral.

Why factuality (75): The article reports on a mysterious radar image showing concentric circles over Slovenia, Croatia, and Italy, which sparked public speculation about alien activity or weather manipulation. It references the Slovenian Environmental Agency (Arso) as providing an explanation, though no primary source i

Why objectivity (65): The tone is somewhat sensationalist, using phrases like 'skrivnostni posnetki' (secret recordings) and 'ugibanj' (guessing), which may encourage speculation. While it presents the scientific explanation, it frames the initial phenomenon as mysterious and intriguing, which can be seen as slightly bia

How each side covered it

The same event, grouped by the political lean of the outlets covering it.

How each side covered it

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Covered around the world

The same event as reported in other countries.

Covered around the world

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Claims check

Key factual claims, and how many sources assert vs dispute each.

Claims check

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Keep the news honest.

ObjectiveNews is reader-funded and ad-free — we show you the bias instead of hiding it. Support independent journalism for €4/month.

Become a Supporter

Related stories