ON
← Back to feed
Quiz Oyedele, Edun over N12trn subsidy savings, APM tasks EFCC
NG🏛️ PoliticsProgressiveyesterday

Quiz Oyedele, Edun over N12trn subsidy savings, APM tasks EFCC

The Allied Peoples’ Movement (APM) has called on the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission (EFCC) to investigate a reported N12 trillion discrepancy in savings from the removal of petrol subsidies. The APM questions the accuracy of figures provided by current and former officials, including Minister of Finance Taiwo Oyedele and his predecessor Wale Edun. They argue that the difference between the claimed savings of N15.8 trillion and previous estimates of N27 trillion highlights potential mismanagement or corruption. The party demands transparency, urging both the EFCC and the National Assembly to probe the issue. APM suggests that the missing funds could be used for significant infrastructure projects like a large-scale refinery or railway development, which they claim would benefit the economy and citizens. The APM accuses the ruling APC party of corruption and greed, asserting that Nigerians have been deprived of these benefits.

The Allied Peoples’ Movement (APM) has formally demanded an investigation into an alleged N12 trillion discrepancy in savings from the removal of petrol subsidies, urging the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission (EFCC) to probe the issue and question senior officials. The petition targets Minister of Finance and Coordinating Minister of the Economy, Taiwo Oyedele, along with his predecessor, Wale Edun, and other officials within the Ministry of Petroleum Resources. The APM claims that the figure represents a significant gap between the N15.8 trillion savings cited by Oyedele and the earlier estimate of approximately $20 billion, equivalent to N27 trillion, as reported under Edun's tenure. According to a statement issued by APM National Publicity Secretary, Abubakar Yusuf, the discrepancy raises critical questions about the accuracy of financial reporting and the transparency of the process. The party emphasized that the missing funds could have been used for major national projects, such as constructing a refinery capable of processing 250,000 to 300,000 barrels per day, which would generate employment opportunities, attract investment, and lower petroleum prices. Additionally, the APM suggested that the funds could finance the construction of a 1,000-kilometre standard railway connecting Lagos, Abuja, and other regions, thereby improving transportation infrastructure and supporting economic activity. The APM accused the ruling All Progressives Congress (APC) of allowing corruption and mismanagement to deprive Nigerians of these benefits. It stated that the alleged diversion of subsidy savings by officials linked to the Tinubu administration has deepened public distrust and highlighted systemic issues in governance. The party reiterated its commitment to holding accountable all individuals responsible for the misuse of public resources. The petition follows growing public scrutiny over the handling of subsidy savings following the government’s decision to remove fuel subsidies in 2023, which led to sharp increases in fuel prices and widespread protests. While the government initially claimed savings of around N15.8 trillion, subsequent reports suggested much higher figures, prompting calls for greater transparency and oversight. The APM’s move comes amid ongoing debates about the allocation of these funds and whether they have been properly managed or diverted for personal gain. The EFCC has yet to respond publicly to the APM’s request, though it has previously investigated cases of financial misconduct involving high-ranking officials. The National Assembly has also been urged to conduct an open inquiry into the matter, with the APM asserting that Nigerians deserve clarity on how these substantial sums were handled. The party warned that failure to address the discrepancies could further erode public confidence in the administration’s ability to manage public finances responsibly. The controversy underscores broader challenges facing Nigerian governance, particularly in ensuring accountability and preventing the misuse of public resources. With the economy struggling under inflationary pressures and limited fiscal space, the fate of the subsidy savings remains a focal point for political and civil society actors seeking to hold the government to account. As the situation develops, the outcome of this investigation could have far-reaching implications for both policy implementation and public trust in institutional integrity.

1 reports

Vanguard Nigeria logoVanguard NigeriaIndependentProgressiveFactual 65Objective 50yesterday
Quiz Oyedele, Edun over N12trn subsidy savings, APM tasks EFCC

The Allied Peoples’ Movement (APM) has called on the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission (EFCC) to investigate a reported N12 trillion discrepancy in savings from the removal of petrol subsidies. The APM questions the accuracy of figures provided by current and former officials, including Minister of Finance Taiwo Oyedele and his predecessor Wale Edun. They argue that the difference between the claimed savings of N15.8 trillion and previous estimates of N27 trillion highlights potential mismanagement or corruption. The party demands transparency, urging both the EFCC and the National Assembly to probe the issue. APM suggests that the missing funds could be used for significant infrastructure projects like a large-scale refinery or railway development, which they claim would benefit the economy and citizens. The APM accuses the ruling APC party of corruption and greed, asserting that Nigerians have been deprived of these benefits.

Bias read (Progressive): The article frames the discrepancy in subsidy savings as evidence of corruption and mismanagement, particularly targeting the APC-led government. It uses strong language such as 'sheer greed,' 'incurable corruption,' and 'denied these life-enhancing benefits' to criticize the ruling party. While the

Why factuality (65): The article presents specific figures regarding alleged discrepancies in petrol subsidy savings and mentions the involvement of APM and EFCC. However, it does not provide direct evidence or sources to verify these claims, relying on statements from APM. The lack of independent verification reduces f

Why objectivity (50): The article uses emotionally charged language such as 'sheer greed, avarice and incurable corruption' to describe the APC, indicating a clear bias against the ruling party. This undermines neutrality and suggests the article is more opinionated than factual.

How each side covered it

The same event, grouped by the political lean of the outlets covering it.

How each side covered it

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Covered around the world

The same event as reported in other countries.

Covered around the world

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Claims check

Key factual claims, and how many sources assert vs dispute each.

Claims check

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Keep the news honest.

ObjectiveNews is reader-funded and ad-free — we show you the bias instead of hiding it. Support independent journalism for €4/month.

Become a Supporter

Related stories