ON
← Back to feed
What will happen to the dollar after Ravier's forecast about "the possibility" of it reaching $1,800
AR🏛️ PoliticsLean Progressive27 days ago

What will happen to the dollar after Ravier's forecast about "the possibility" of it reaching $1,800

The article discusses the implications of President's spokesperson Adrián Ravier's comments suggesting that the Argentine peso could reach $1,800 against the US dollar within months. While Ravier claims such a jump is 'completely discarded' compared to past crises, he acknowledges it as a possibility. Economists and analysts like Carlos Maslatón, Roberto Cachanosky, Antonio Aracre, and Christian Buteler respond critically, arguing that Ravier's remarks could encourage further currency speculation and market instability. Some warn that reaching $1,800 would represent a significant depreciation, potentially leading to inflationary pressures and economic uncertainty. The debate highlights tensions between government messaging and market realities.

The Argentine peso has once again become the focal point of economic debate after presidential spokesperson Adrián Ravier suggested during a live stream on the platform Carajo that the dollar could reach up to $1,800 within months. The statement, which was framed as a “possibility” rather than a certainty, sparked immediate controversy among economists, business leaders, and political analysts. Ravier emphasized that while a sharp jump similar to past crises was “completely ruled out,” he acknowledged that reaching between $1,700 and $1,800 over the coming months was still a viable scenario. Ravier’s remarks were met with skepticism from several quarters. Economist Carlos Maslatón, known for his critical stance toward government economic policies, argued that such projections could inadvertently encourage speculation and further destabilize the currency. He warned that if the peso continues to weaken, the market might react more aggressively than anticipated. “If you surpass these levels, 1580, 1600, you won’t stop at 1,800. You’ll go much higher, maybe even to $3,800,” Maslatón said in a segment on Ahora Play. He accused Ravier of potentially inciting a speculative run on the dollar, noting that many financial instruments tied to the U.S. currency are already under pressure due to capital controls and other restrictions. Other experts echoed similar concerns. Roberto Cachanosky, a well-known economist on social media platform X, questioned whether Ravier’s comments would lead individuals to buy dollars now at around $1,500 or wait until they hit $1,800. “This kind of talk can create uncertainty in the market,” Cachanosky wrote. Meanwhile, libertarian economist Antonio Aracre criticized the government for its contradictory messaging, pointing out that officials often contradict each other on economic matters. “After all the theatrics surrounding the dollar’s value, the only response that matters is the central bank’s decisive action,” Aracre stated. Christian Buteler, another analyst, offered a more measured take. He noted that a dollar reaching $1,800 would align with the Bank of Argentina’s (BCRA) exchange rate bands, though it would represent a 20% depreciation. Buteler warned that this shift would likely translate into inflationary pressures and increased costs for consumers. “Such a move would have an unavoidable effect on prices and inflation,” he explained. Meanwhile, some analysts viewed Ravier’s comments as part of a broader strategy to manage public expectations. They pointed out that the government has been careful to avoid making definitive statements about the future of the peso, instead emphasizing the need for stability and gradual adjustments. However, critics argue that this approach risks undermining confidence in the currency and creating confusion among both investors and ordinary citizens. Political tensions have also intensified in recent weeks, with opposition figures accusing the administration of failing to address key economic challenges. Some lawmakers have called for greater transparency regarding the government’s monetary policy, particularly given the ongoing debates over capital controls and the role of private sector actors in managing foreign exchange reserves. The situation has added to the growing sense of uncertainty in markets, with businesses and households increasingly wary of long-term planning amid fluctuating exchange rates. As the debate continues, one thing remains clear: the trajectory of the peso will depend not only on official statements but also on how the market interprets them, and how quickly policymakers respond to emerging signals of instability. For now, the focus remains on the next steps in Argentina’s complex economic landscape.

3 reports

Perfil logoPerfilIndependentProgressiveFactual 90Objective 7029 days ago
What will happen to the dollar after Ravier's forecast about "the possibility" of it reaching $1,800

The article discusses the implications of President's spokesperson Adrián Ravier's comments suggesting that the Argentine peso could reach $1,800 against the US dollar within months. While Ravier claims such a jump is 'completely discarded' compared to past crises, he acknowledges it as a possibility. Economists and analysts like Carlos Maslatón, Roberto Cachanosky, Antonio Aracre, and Christian Buteler respond critically, arguing that Ravier's remarks could encourage further currency speculation and market instability. Some warn that reaching $1,800 would represent a significant depreciation, potentially leading to inflationary pressures and economic uncertainty. The debate highlights tensions between government messaging and market realities.

Bias read (Progressive): The article frames Ravier's cautious acknowledgment of a potential dollar surge as controversial and politically sensitive, emphasizing concerns over economic stability and market manipulation. Analysts criticize the government's stance as misleading or irresponsible, suggesting a left-leaning bias.

Why factuality (90): The article quotes Adrián Ravier’s comments regarding the possibility of the dollar reaching $1,800 and includes responses from analysts like Carlos Maslatón. While these quotes are accurate, the article leans into the criticism of Ravier, giving more weight to the opposing viewpoint.

Why objectivity (70): The article has a clear bias toward criticizing Ravier’s comments and the potential rise of the dollar. It emphasizes the views of critics over those who might support Ravier’s analysis, making it less neutral in tone.

Infobae logoInfobaeIndependentCenterFactual 35Objective 2027 days ago
Electoral risk, informal employment, the role of SMEs and no additional funding: Georgieva's four definitions

The article discusses four key themes defined by Kristalina Georgieva, the Managing Director of the International Monetary Fund (IMF). These include the risks associated with elections, the issue of informal employment, the role of small and medium-sized enterprises (pymes), and opposition to additional funding. The piece highlights how these topics intersect with economic challenges facing Argentina, particularly in terms of stability and growth. It emphasizes the importance of addressing these issues through sound economic policies and international cooperation. The focus is on the implications of these factors for Argentina’s economy and its potential for recovery.

Bias read (Center): The article presents four distinct areas of concern identified by Georgieva without overtly favoring any particular political stance. While the topics are politically sensitive, the framing remains balanced, focusing on economic indicators and policy recommendations rather than taking a clear left-或

Why factuality (35): This article lists four definitions or points attributed to Georgieva, but does not provide detailed explanations or supporting evidence for each point. It appears to be a summary of her public statements without contextual depth, limiting its factual value in understanding the broader economic situ

Why objectivity (20): The article presents information in a very detached manner, but lacks any attempt to balance perspectives or provide counterpoints. It reads more like a list of talking points rather than a nuanced report, suggesting a lack of objectivity in its presentation.

Clarín logoClarínIndependentProgressiveFactual 30Objective 2527 days ago
Georgieva, intimate: her past in a communist country, the advice on dollars and the joke to Caputo

The article features an interview with Kristalina Georgieva, focusing on her personal experiences growing up in a communist country, advice related to dollar usage, and a humorous remark directed at Caputo. The piece appears to blend personal anecdotes with commentary on economic policies, highlighting her background and perspectives on financial matters.

Bias read (Progressive): The article frames Georgieva's past in a communist country as relevant to current economic discussions, suggesting a critique of capitalist systems while emphasizing her expertise in financial matters. The tone leans toward valuing experience in non-capitalist systems and subtly critiques certain U$

Why factuality (30): This article focuses on Katarina Georgieva’s background and personal anecdotes, with little to no information about current economic policy or dollar forecasts. It appears more like a profile piece than an analysis of economic conditions, making it difficult to assess factual accuracy related to the

Why objectivity (25): The article has a very subjective tone, focusing on personal stories and perceived criticisms of political figures like Caputo. There is no objective discussion of economic policies or market trends, and the content seems more aimed at commentary than reporting.

How each side covered it

The same event, grouped by the political lean of the outlets covering it.

How each side covered it

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Covered around the world

The same event as reported in other countries.

Covered around the world

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Claims check

Key factual claims, and how many sources assert vs dispute each.

Claims check

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Keep the news honest.

ObjectiveNews is reader-funded and ad-free — we show you the bias instead of hiding it. Support independent journalism for €4/month.

Become a Supporter

Related stories