ON
← Back to feed
Poljak commented on Kerum's arrest and Shota's reaction:
Croatia🏛️ PoliticsProgressiveyesterday

Poljak commented on Kerum's arrest and Shota's reaction:

Saborska zastupnica i predsjednica stranke Centar Marijana Puljak komentirala je uhićenje Željka Keruma, bivšeg gradonačelnika Splita i predsjednika Hrvatske građanske stranke (HGS), koje je sinoć u Vela Luci na Korčuli obavljeno zbog optužbi za kriminal i korupciju. Puljak kritikovala je suradnju između Keruma i splitskog gradonačelnika Tomislava Šute, kojeg smatra političkim pokroviteljem i knjigovođom. Osmjerila je pažnju na moguće posledice za građane Splita i opominula za potrebu za promjenama u vlasti. Šuta je odgovorio da Kerum nije član Gradskog vijeća i da ne sudjeluje u njegovom radu, dodajuci da će Kerum priču iznijeti u okviru zakonskog postupka.

A prominent political figure has publicly criticized the arrest of Željko Kerum, former mayor of Split and leader of the Croatian Civic Party (HGS), while another local official defended the move, emphasizing legal procedures and ongoing collaboration. The comments come amid growing public scrutiny over alleged corruption and criminal ties within local government circles. Marijana Puljak, a member of parliament and leader of the Center party, expressed her views on the situation following the arrest of Kerum. She accused local business interests and criminal networks of exerting undue influence over city affairs, pointing to Tomislav Šuta, the current mayor of Split, as a key political ally. In her statement, Puljak claimed that Šuta, who she described as a “political patron and bookkeeper,” had publicly announced continued cooperation with Kerum despite his detention. She questioned whether this would mean future consultations on urban projects and the General Urban Plan (GUP) would take place behind bars, suggesting that citizens of Split should be fully aware of the extent of corruption involving the ruling party and Kerum himself. Kerum was arrested late yesterday in Vela Luka, on the island of Korčula, according to reports. He was detained under suspicion of involvement in organized crime and corruption. His arrest followed months of speculation and allegations against him, including claims of financial misconduct and collusion with local traders. Puljak’s remarks highlight the deepening tensions between different factions within Split's political landscape, particularly regarding the role of the ruling party and its connections to local economic actors. In response to the controversy, Šuta issued a statement clarifying that Kerum is not a member of the City Council and does not participate in its operations. He emphasized that the city council, led by Mayor Igor Stanisic, continues to work effectively with representatives of the HGS. Šuta stated that Kerum’s case is being handled by appropriate authorities and that he will not comment further on matters currently under investigation. He also noted that Kerum will have the opportunity to present his side of the story through the legal process. The incident has sparked renewed debate about the transparency and accountability of local governance in Split. Public officials and activists have called for greater oversight and stricter enforcement of anti-corruption measures. Meanwhile, the legal proceedings against Kerum are expected to unfold in the coming weeks, with potential implications for both his personal career and the broader political environment in Croatia. As the situation develops, observers are watching closely for any signs of internal conflict or shifts in power dynamics within the city administration. With the legal process underway and political statements continuing to circulate, the outcome of this case could have lasting effects on how local governance is perceived and managed in Split.

How each side covered it

The same event, grouped by the political lean of the outlets covering it.

How each side covered it

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and your personalized For You feed.

Become a Supporter

Covered around the world

The same event as reported in other countries.

Covered around the world

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and your personalized For You feed.

Become a Supporter

Claims check

Key factual claims, and how many sources assert vs dispute each.

Claims check

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and your personalized For You feed.

Become a Supporter

1 reports

N1 Hrvatska logoN1 HrvatskaIndependentProgressiveFactual 85Objective 70yesterday
Poljak commented on Kerum's arrest and Shota's reaction:

Saborska zastupnica i predsjednica stranke Centar Marijana Puljak komentirala je uhićenje Željka Keruma, bivšeg gradonačelnika Splita i predsjednika Hrvatske građanske stranke (HGS), koje je sinoć u Vela Luci na Korčuli obavljeno zbog optužbi za kriminal i korupciju. Puljak kritikovala je suradnju između Keruma i splitskog gradonačelnika Tomislava Šute, kojeg smatra političkim pokroviteljem i knjigovođom. Osmjerila je pažnju na moguće posledice za građane Splita i opominula za potrebu za promjenama u vlasti. Šuta je odgovorio da Kerum nije član Gradskog vijeća i da ne sudjeluje u njegovom radu, dodajuci da će Kerum priču iznijeti u okviru zakonskog postupka.

Bias read (Progressive): The article frames the situation as a critique of corruption and criminal networks within the ruling party (HDZ), which is associated with the right-wing. The author uses strong language against the political figures involved, suggesting systemic issues and calling for civic action. The tone leans左翼

Why factuality (85): The article accurately reports the arrest of Željko Kerum and quotes Marijana Puljak's comments about the alleged criminal ties between Kerum and Tomislav Šuta. It also includes Šuta’s response denying any connection and emphasizing cooperation with the city council. The facts align with the cross-s

Why objectivity (70): The article presents Puljak's statements in a critical tone, using phrases like 'sramotno' (shameful) and suggesting Šuta might be conducting consultations from prison. This framing leans toward a particular political perspective rather than maintaining strict neutrality.

Keep the news honest.

ObjectiveNews is reader-funded and ad-free — we show you the bias instead of hiding it. Support independent journalism for €5/month.

Become a Supporter

Related stories