2027 Elections: SERAP urges INEC to publish political donation limits, party finances
SERAP, a Nigerian human rights organization, has called on the Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC) to disclose its policies and mechanisms for regulating political donations and campaign expenditures ahead of the 2027 elections. In a formal Freedom of Information request, SERAP asked INEC to reveal whether it has set limits on political contributions under Section 91 of the Electoral Act, 2026, and to provide details on its monitoring systems and enforcement procedures. The group emphasized that greater transparency in political financing is crucial for ensuring fair elections and enabling citizens to make informed decisions. SERAP argued that INEC has a constitutional duty to examine political-party finances, conduct investigations, and report findings to the National Assembly. They warned that without such measures, the increasing commercialization of Nigerian elections threatens democratic integrity and electoral fairness.
A civil society group has called on Nigeria's electoral commission to reveal the limits on political donations set under new election laws ahead of the 2027 general elections. The Socio-Economic Rights and Accountability Project (SERAP) issued the demand in a letter addressed to the chairman of the Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC), Professor Joash Amupitan, on Sunday. SERAP, represented by its deputy director Kolawole Oluwadare, emphasized the urgency of the request, citing the release of the Notice of Election and the timetable for the upcoming polls. The organization argued that transparency regarding financial regulations is crucial to ensuring fair electoral practices and enabling voters to make informed decisions. The group specifically asked INEC to clarify whether it had used its authority under section 91 of the Electoral Act, 2026, to establish limits on political contributions. If such limits exist, SERAP requested that they be published and communicated broadly to political parties, candidates, donors, and the public. Additionally, SERAP sought information on the mechanisms INEC has established to oversee and enforce compliance with these limits. This includes inquiries into the systems, personnel, and procedures in place to monitor political financing, especially concerning cash and in-kind contributions, digital and social media spending, third-party expenditures, and donations channeled through intermediaries. The organization highlighted the need for transparency to prevent the distortion of electoral competition through excessive or illicit funding. It noted that the growing role of money in Nigerian politics, combined with possible abuse of state institutions, threatens the integrity of the democratic process. SERAP pointed out that political parties, candidates, and their supporters are already gathering resources, seeking contributions, organizing events, buying media and digital ads, and incurring expenses related to campaigns. Therefore, the group urged INEC to outline its plans for monitoring political financing during this period, focusing particularly on contributions and expenditures involving cash, in-kind donations, digital and social media advertising, political consultants, and third-party campaign costs. The organization referenced Section 91(1) of the Electoral Act, 2026, which grants INEC the authority to impose restrictions on the amount of money or other assets individuals can contribute to political parties or candidates. It also mentioned Section 91(2), which outlines penalties for exceeding the limits set by the commission. These provisions, according to SERAP, serve as critical safeguards against undue financial influence in politics. SERAP stressed that INEC's duties extend beyond merely receiving financial disclosures from political entities. The Constitution mandates the commission to scrutinize political party finances, conduct investigations, and report findings to the National Assembly. Making these reports public would allow citizens to assess whether these constitutional and legal obligations have been fulfilled effectively. The organization warned that the rising financialization of Nigerian elections, coupled with the risk of misusing state institutions, presents significant challenges to democratic principles and electoral fairness. By disclosing the requested information, citizens could detect excessive, hidden, or possibly illegal political financing before it undermines electoral competition, rather than only after the results are known. As the 2027 elections approach, the call for transparency underscores the importance of maintaining trust in the electoral process. With political actors actively preparing for the campaign season, the clarity provided by INEC could play a pivotal role in shaping the landscape of the upcoming elections.
2 reports
The PunchIndependentProgressiveFactual 85Objective 808/23/2026
The Socio-Economic Rights and Accountability Project (SERAP) has called on Nigeria's Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC) to disclose and publish political contribution limits set under the Electoral Act, 2026, ahead of the 2027 general elections. In a statement issued by its Deputy Director, Kolawole Oluwadare, SERAP urged INEC to reveal whether it has exercised its statutory authority to establish limits on political contributions under Section 91 of the Act. The organization emphasized the need for transparency in monitoring and enforcing compliance with these limits, including systems for tracking cash, in-kind contributions, digital financing, and third-party expenditures. SERAP argued that greater transparency is essential to ensure fair elections and allow voters to make informed decisions. It highlighted concerns about the growing monetization of Nigerian politics and the risks posed to democratic integrity.
Bias read (Progressive): The article frames the call for transparency in political financing as a critical necessity for protecting democratic integrity and electoral fairness. While it does not overtly criticize specific political actors, it emphasizes systemic issues related to the concentration of wealth in political捐贈,
Why factuality (85): The article accurately reports SERAP's call for INEC to disclose political contribution limits under the Electoral Act, 2026, as per the organization's official statement. It provides details about the timing of the request, the specific sections of the law referenced, and the scope of the disclosur
Why objectivity (80): The article presents SERAP's demands in a neutral manner, focusing on the content of their statement without expressing personal opinion or bias. However, there is a slight tilt towards highlighting the importance of transparency, which may subtly imply criticism of current practices, though this is
SERAP, a Nigerian human rights organization, has called on the Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC) to disclose its policies and mechanisms for regulating political donations and campaign expenditures ahead of the 2027 elections. In a formal Freedom of Information request, SERAP asked INEC to reveal whether it has set limits on political contributions under Section 91 of the Electoral Act, 2026, and to provide details on its monitoring systems and enforcement procedures. The group emphasized that greater transparency in political financing is crucial for ensuring fair elections and enabling citizens to make informed decisions. SERAP argued that INEC has a constitutional duty to examine political-party finances, conduct investigations, and report findings to the National Assembly. They warned that without such measures, the increasing commercialization of Nigerian elections threatens democratic integrity and electoral fairness.
Bias read (Center): The article presents SERAP's call for transparency in political financing as a matter of public interest and democratic accountability. It does not overtly favor any particular political ideology or party but highlights concerns about the lack of regulatory oversight and the risks posed to electoral
Why factuality (85): The article accurately summarizes SERAP's requests to INEC regarding the disclosure of political donation limits and monitoring procedures. It includes direct quotes from SERAP and references specific legal provisions (section 91 of the Electoral Act, 2026) and constitutional duties. However, it doe
Why objectivity (80): The article presents SERAP's position objectively, using direct quotes and avoiding overtly biased language. While it supports SERAP's arguments, it does not present counterarguments or alternative perspectives, which slightly reduces its balance.
How each side covered it
The same event, grouped by the political lean of the outlets covering it.
progressive
center
conservative
★
How each side covered it
Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.