For the Guarantor, if they are under 14 years old, the consent of the other parent is required

OpenIndependentCenterFactual 95Objective 8520 days ago

The Italian Data Protection Authority (Garante) has emphasized that parents must obtain consent from both partners before posting photos of children under 14 years old on social media. This rule was highlighted in a June 17th newsletter summarizing a decision made in April. The authority ruled that sharing images of minors under 14 without the other parent’s consent is illegal. Once children turn 14, they gain the autonomy to decide whether their images are shared online. The case arose after a man complained to the Garante about his ex-wife repeatedly posting photos of their underage children

Bias read (Center): The article presents a legal ruling by an official body regarding data protection and parental consent. It provides factual information without apparent ideological framing or biased language. The content focuses on policy interpretation rather than political debate.

Why these scores (Factual 95 · Objective 85): The article accurately reports the Garante's stance on parental consent for sharing photos of minors under 14. It presents the case clearly and neutrally, with minimal bias and strong adherence to the cross-source consensus.

Il Fatto QuotidianoIndependentConservativeFactual 85Objective 7021 days ago

An article discusses a controversy involving a 26-year-old woman who shared screenshots from a private chat between ATM employees on social media. The incident has sparked debate over privacy rights and legal boundaries. Agostino Ghiglia, a member of the Italian Data Protection Authority and affiliated with Fratelli d'Italia, criticized the woman for potentially violating privacy laws by sharing the content. Cathy La Torre, an attorney specializing in privacy law and representing the woman, countered that Ghiglia made premature conclusions without reviewing the full details of the case.

Bias read (Conservative): The article frames the situation through the perspective of Agostino Ghiglia, a conservative-affiliated figure within the Data Protection Authority, emphasizing potential legal violations by the woman. The narrative highlights his criticism of her actions while downplaying the lack of formal review,

Why these scores (Factual 85 · Objective 70): The article provides detailed quotes from Ghiglia and Cathy La Torre, presenting both sides of the debate regarding privacy laws. The facts align with the cross-source consensus but uses emotionally charged language like 'chat sessista' which may affect objectivity.

la RepubblicaIndependent🔒CenterFactual 80Objective 7523 days ago

The article discusses Australia's position as a global leader in implementing restrictions on social media usage for minors, specifically a generalized block for those under 16. It contrasts this with Italy, where discussions around similar regulations are ongoing but no outright bans have been enacted. In Italy, platforms require parental consent for users under 14 years old. The article mentions four proposed bills that have yet to be approved.

Bias read (Center): The article presents factual information about regulatory measures in Australia and Italy without overtly favoring one side. It provides a balanced comparison between the two countries' approaches to social media regulation for minors, mentioning both existing policies and pending legislation in an

Why these scores (Factual 80 · Objective 75): The article discusses Australia’s stricter policies compared to Italy, where no outright ban exists. While generally accurate, it lacks specific details and relies more on general statements, slightly reducing factual depth and neutrality.