Psychic poet ordered to pay £216k bill after losing fight with sister over inheritance
A self-proclaimed psychic named Gary Pammen, known as 'The Cockney Bard,' has been ordered to pay £216,000 in legal costs after losing an inheritance dispute against his younger sister Tracy Pammen and her daughter Paige Pammen. The case revolved around the 2016 will of their late father, Terrance Pammen, who left his £451,840 estate—primarily a house in Stratford, east London—to Tracy and Paige, excluding Gary and his other siblings. Gary claimed his father lacked testamentary capacity due to mental frailty and alleged that Tracy had raided his father's bank accounts. However, Judge Simon Monty ruled in favor of Tracy and Paige, stating that Gary's claim was based on suspicion and confirmation bias. The judge noted that Gary failed to accept his father's decision to disinherit him and his other siblings. Gary, who represented himself in the trial, argued that his father was suffering from cognitive impairment and confusion at the time of signing the will, but these claims were rejected by the court.
A self-proclaimed psychic and poet known as "The Cockney Bard" has been ordered to pay £216,000 in legal costs following a high-profile inheritance dispute with his younger sister and her daughter. Gary Pammen, who claims to receive inspiration for his poetry from spiritual entities, had contested the validity of a will left by his late father, Terrance Pammen, who died in May 2022 at the age of 83. The will, dated 2016, allocated nearly the entire estate—valued at £451,840, including a property in Stratford, East London—to Gary’s sister Tracy and her daughter Paige. This decision excluded Gary and his other three siblings, Mark, Jacqueline, and Gemma, from inheriting any significant portion of the estate.
The legal battle centered around whether Terrance Pammen possessed the necessary mental clarity, referred to as "testamentary capacity," when he executed the will. Gary argued that his father suffered from cognitive decline and confusion regarding both his family relationships and the extent of his assets. He further alleged that Tracy had improperly accessed their father’s financial accounts in his later years. These claims were met with strong opposition from Tracy and Paige, who maintained that Terrance was fully aware and composed when creating the will. They emphasized that he continued to work at a local supermarket, sorting shopping trolleys, even after drafting the document. Their legal representative, Tom Gosling, asserted that psychiatric evaluations confirmed Terrance’s mental state was sound at the time of making the will.
The court proceedings were presided over by Judge Simon Monty, who ruled in favor of Tracy and Paige. In his judgment, the judge noted that Gary's challenge was rooted in personal familial tensions rather than concrete evidence. He described Gary’s interpretation of the situation as being influenced by "confirmation bias," where he viewed all available information as supporting his case, despite lacking substantial proof. The judge concluded that Terrance clearly intended to exclude Gary and his other siblings from inheriting any meaningful share of his estate.
Gary, who represented himself throughout the trial, expressed frustration over being excluded from the will. He stated that he maintained regular communication with his father via telephone and believed they shared a close relationship. According to Gary, there was no apparent justification for his exclusion from the inheritance. His arguments focused heavily on the idea that his father might have been unduly influenced or confused at the time of drafting the will. However, these assertions were countered by Tracy and her legal team, who presented evidence suggesting that Terrance remained mentally capable and independent in his decisions leading up to his death.
Despite the court’s ruling, the emotional weight of the case remains evident. Gary, now residing in Norfolk, continues to assert his belief in his psychic abilities, claiming that his poetry is channeled through spiritual forces. While the legal outcome has been definitive, the broader implications of the case extend into discussions about the reliability of testamentary capacity assessments and the role of family dynamics in such disputes. The case highlights the complexities surrounding estate planning, particularly when family members hold divergent views on the mental state of a testator. As the legal dust settles, the focus shifts toward understanding how such cases might influence future legal interpretations and the importance of thorough documentation in estate planning processes.
3 reports
Daily MailIndependentCenterFactual 95Objective 703 days ago
Gary Pammen, known as 'The Cockney Bard', lost an inheritance dispute over his late father Terrance Pammen's £451,840 estate. The will, created in 2016, left nearly everything to Gary's younger sister Tracy Pammen and her daughter Paige Pammen, excluding Gary and his other three siblings. Gary argued his father lacked testamentary capacity due to mental frailty, claiming he was confused about his family and estate. Tracy and Paige maintained their father was fully capable and had clear intentions. The court ruled in favor of Tracy and Paige, ordering Gary to cover the legal costs. Gary, who claims to possess psychic abilities, alleged Tracy had accessed their father's finances, though this was denied.
Bias read (Center): The article presents both sides of the inheritance dispute without overtly favoring either party. It includes Gary's allegations of his father's diminished mental capacity and Tracy's defense of his lucidity, without taking a clear ideological stance. While the subject involves personal family law,它
Why these scores (Factual 95 · Objective 70): Factuality is very high as the article provides detailed and consistent information about the case, matching the cross-source consensus. Objectivity is slightly lower due to the repeated emphasis on Gary's status as a 'psychic' and the emotionally charged language around his loss.
The IndependentIndependentCenterFactual 90Objective 753 days ago
A self-proclaimed psychic named Gary Pammen, known as 'The Cockney Bard,' has been ordered to pay £216,000 in legal costs after losing an inheritance dispute against his younger sister Tracy Pammen and her daughter Paige Pammen. The case revolved around the 2016 will of their late father, Terrance Pammen, who left his £451,840 estate—primarily a house in Stratford, east London—to Tracy and Paige, excluding Gary and his other siblings. Gary claimed his father lacked testamentary capacity due to mental frailty and alleged that Tracy had raided his father's bank accounts. However, Judge Simon Monty ruled in favor of Tracy and Paige, stating that Gary's claim was based on suspicion and confirmation bias. The judge noted that Gary failed to accept his father's decision to disinherit him and his other siblings. Gary, who represented himself in the trial, argued that his father was suffering from cognitive impairment and confusion at the time of signing the will, but these claims were rejected by the court.
Bias read (Center): While the subject involves a personal inheritance dispute, it does not directly involve political figures, policies, or governmental actions. The framing of the article remains neutral, presenting both sides of the argument without overtly leaning toward either Gary's spiritual claims or Tracy's and
Why these scores (Factual 90 · Objective 75): Factuality is high as the article accurately reports the legal outcome and details of the case, aligning with the cross-source consensus. Objectivity is lower due to the use of terms like 'psychic' and 'clairvoyant' which may imply a subjective view, though the facts are presented neutrally.
A yoga teacher and birth doula named Gabriela Teixeira, 51, has won a High Court battle against her late husband's brother, Amir, and others over the inheritance of her late husband Abbas Moaven's £5 million estate. After Abbas died in 2012, Gabriela discovered that legal documents he had signed just weeks before his death claimed four valuable properties were not fully his, but belonged to his mother and brother, significantly reducing the estate's value. The court ruled these documents were a 'sham' intended to prevent Gabriela from accessing most of Abbas's wealth. As a result, Amir, along with Abbas's accountant and conveyancing solicitor, has been ordered to pay £490,000 in legal costs. The case highlights complex legal disputes over inheritance and the potential complicity of professionals in creating fraudulent documents.
Bias read (Left): The article frames the dispute as a struggle between a widow and her late husband's family, emphasizing the legal injustice faced by Gabriela. It portrays the actions of Amir and the professionals involved as deliberate fraud, using strong language like 'sham' and 'fiction.' This framing aligns more
★
Keep the news honest.
ObjectiveNews is reader-funded and ad-free — we show you the bias instead of hiding it. Support independent journalism for €5/month.
United Kingdom
