Psychic poet ordered to pay £216k bill after losing fight with sister over inheritance
A self-proclaimed psychic named Gary Pammen, known as 'The Cockney Bard,' has been ordered to pay £216,000 in legal costs after losing an inheritance dispute against his younger sister Tracy Pammen and her daughter Paige Pammen. The case revolved around the 2016 will of their late father, Terrance Pammen, who left his £451,840 estate—primarily a house in Stratford, east London—to Tracy and Paige, excluding Gary and his other siblings. Gary claimed his father lacked testamentary capacity due to mental frailty and alleged that Tracy had raided his father's bank accounts. However, Judge Simon Monty ruled in favor of Tracy and Paige, stating that Gary's claim was based on suspicion and confirmation bias. The judge noted that Gary failed to accept his father's decision to disinherit him and his other siblings. Gary, who represented himself in the trial, argued that his father was suffering from cognitive impairment and confusion at the time of signing the will, but these claims were rejected by the court.
A prominent psychic TV poet known as "The Cockney Bard" has lost a high-profile inheritance dispute with his younger sister and her daughter, after being excluded from his late father's will. Gary Pammen, who has appeared on BBC, Sky, and ITV programs, argued that his father, Terrance Pammen, was not of sound mind when he created the will in 2016. However, a court ruled in favor of Tracy Pammen and her daughter Paige Pammen, who inherited nearly the entire £451,840 estate, including a house in Stratford, east London. Gary Pammen, 65, represented himself in the case and claimed that his father suffered from cognitive decline and confusion regarding his family relationships and the extent of his estate. He alleged that Terrance Pammen, who died in May 2022 at the age of 83, was not aware of the implications of the will and that it was drafted under conditions of mental frailty. Gary further accused Tracy of misusing their father's bank accounts in his later years, though these allegations were dismissed by Tracy and her legal team. The court heard that Terrance Pammen continued to work at a supermarket, sorting shopping trolleys at Morrisons, even after drafting the will. His barrister, Tom Gosling, stated that there were no doubts about Terrance's mental state at the time of creating the will, supported by expert psychiatric testimony confirming his soundness of mind. Although Terrance was eventually diagnosed with dementia in 2020, the defense argued that he showed no signs of memory loss until 2017 or 2018. Judge Simon Monty upheld the validity of the will, stating that Gary could not accept that his father had chosen to exclude him and his other siblings—Mark, Jacqueline, and Gemma—from the inheritance. The judge noted that Gary's belief in his case was based on confirmation bias rather than concrete evidence. As a result, Gary was ordered to pay £216,000 in legal costs incurred by Tracy and Paige. Gary, who resides in Norfolk, emphasized that he maintained regular contact with his father via telephone and expressed love and respect for him. He claimed there was no apparent reason for his exclusion from the will. Despite this, the court found no grounds to challenge the will's legitimacy, affirming that Terrance Pammen had full awareness and intent when making his decisions. The inheritance dispute highlights the complexities surrounding estate planning and the challenges faced by families dealing with such issues. While Gary sought to contest the will on the basis of his father's mental condition, the court's decision underscores the importance of clear documentation and testamentary capacity in ensuring the wishes of the deceased are honored. The case also brings attention to the role of mental health assessments in determining the validity of wills. Experts testified that Terrance Pammen was of sound mind when he executed the will, reinforcing the court's decision. This outcome serves as a reminder for individuals to seek professional guidance when preparing their estates to avoid potential disputes among heirs. As the legal proceedings conclude, the focus shifts to the broader implications of this case. It raises questions about the reliability of self-representation in complex legal matters and the necessity for thorough evaluation of mental states prior to executing significant documents. The resolution of this inheritance dispute offers insights into the judicial approach towards challenging wills based on claims of diminished mental capacity.
How each side covered it
The same event, grouped by the political lean of the outlets covering it.
progressive
center
conservative
★
How each side covered it
Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and your personalized For You feed.
Gary Pammen, known as 'The Cockney Bard', lost an inheritance dispute over his late father Terrance Pammen's £451,840 estate. The will, created in 2016, left nearly everything to Gary's younger sister Tracy Pammen and her daughter Paige Pammen, excluding Gary and his other three siblings. Gary argued his father lacked testamentary capacity due to mental frailty, claiming he was confused about his family and estate. Tracy and Paige maintained their father was fully capable and had clear intentions. The court ruled in favor of Tracy and Paige, ordering Gary to cover the legal costs. Gary, who claims to possess psychic abilities, alleged Tracy had accessed their father's finances, though this was denied.
Bias read (Center): The article presents both sides of the inheritance dispute without overtly favoring either party. It includes Gary's allegations of his father's diminished mental capacity and Tracy's defense of his lucidity, without taking a clear ideological stance. While the subject involves personal family law,它
Why these scores (Factual 95 · Objective 70): Factual claims are highly consistent with the cross-source consensus and provide detailed information about the case. The article accurately reports the court decision and the judge's remarks. Objectivity is slightly affected by the emphasis on Gary's 'psychic' identity and the dramatic description
The IndependentIndependentCenterFactual 85Objective 7010 days ago
A self-proclaimed psychic named Gary Pammen, known as 'The Cockney Bard,' has been ordered to pay £216,000 in legal costs after losing an inheritance dispute against his younger sister Tracy Pammen and her daughter Paige Pammen. The case revolved around the 2016 will of their late father, Terrance Pammen, who left his £451,840 estate—primarily a house in Stratford, east London—to Tracy and Paige, excluding Gary and his other siblings. Gary claimed his father lacked testamentary capacity due to mental frailty and alleged that Tracy had raided his father's bank accounts. However, Judge Simon Monty ruled in favor of Tracy and Paige, stating that Gary's claim was based on suspicion and confirmation bias. The judge noted that Gary failed to accept his father's decision to disinherit him and his other siblings. Gary, who represented himself in the trial, argued that his father was suffering from cognitive impairment and confusion at the time of signing the will, but these claims were rejected by the court.
Bias read (Center): While the subject involves a personal inheritance dispute, it does not directly involve political figures, policies, or governmental actions. The framing of the article remains neutral, presenting both sides of the argument without overtly leaning toward either Gary's spiritual claims or Tracy's and
Why these scores (Factual 85 · Objective 70): Factual details align with the cross-source consensus about the inheritance dispute and court outcome. However, the article uses emotionally charged language like 'psychic' and 'clairvoyant' which may influence perception. The judge's comments suggest a critical view of Gary's approach, which could
Daily MailIndependentCenterFactual 70Objective 657 days ago
Ricky Hatton's family is embroiled in a dispute over his £40 million estate after he died by suicide in September 2023 without leaving a will. Trustees were appointed to manage his assets, but communication between the family and the trustees has broken down, leaving the children—Campbell, 25, and daughters Millie, 14, and Fearne, 12—in the dark about the distribution of funds. It was believed Hatton intended to leave his wealth to his children, though his absence of a will has complicated matters. His extensive property investments are expected to provide long-term financial security for them. Separately, Hatton's car was torched in a targeted attack outside his son's home, prompting an ongoing police investigation.
Bias read (Center): The article presents a factual account of a personal and legal dispute without overtly favoring any political ideology. While the issue involves inheritance law and family dynamics, there is no indication of partisan framing or ideological emphasis. The focus remains on the family's struggle with an
Why these scores (Factual 70 · Objective 65): Facts about Ricky Hatton's death and the absence of a will are consistent with general knowledge. However, the article lacks specific details about the current status of the estate and presents the situation as chaotic without balancing perspectives from all parties involved.
★
Keep the news honest.
ObjectiveNews is reader-funded and ad-free — we show you the bias instead of hiding it. Support independent journalism for €5/month.
United Kingdom
