ON
← Back to feed
First day on the job, he got fired over a 47-second phone call.
Croatia🏛️ PoliticsProgressiveyesterday

First day on the job, he got fired over a 47-second phone call.

Jedan zdravstveni djelatnik u Švedskoj tvrdi da je dobio otkaz tek prvog dana na poslu, tijekom telefonskog razgovora koji je trajao 47 sekundi. Incident se desio 23. srpnja u ustanovi za njegu starijih osoba u okolici Stockholma. Radnik je stigao ranije kako bi se presuo u uniformu, ali nije pronašao svlačionicu. Kada je tražio pomoć kolega, bili su ignorirani. Tijekom početka smjene, osjećaj izgubljenosti i pritisak su doveli do napada panike. Poslao je poruku nadređenom, ali umjesto razumijevanja dobio je otkaz. Tvrdi da je otkaz nepravedan i čin diskriminacije na temelju mentalnog zdravlja. Slučaj je prijavljen švedskom pučkom pravobranitelju za ravnopravnost. Incident podcrtava šire probleme oko prava radnika i podrške u slučajevima mentalnog zdravlja.

A health worker in Sweden claims he was dismissed on his first day of work during a 47-second phone call. He is now seeking compensation. The incident occurred on July 23 at a care facility near Stockholm. According to the employee, he arrived early to get dressed in uniform and prepare for his shift. However, he could not find a changing room for staff members. When he asked nearby colleagues for help, they reportedly ignored him. As the shift began, feelings of being lost and pressured intensified into a severe panic attack. He retreated to the stairwell to try to calm down and sent a message to his supervisor explaining what had happened and apologizing for potential delays. He expected understanding, but instead received a call. During the conversation, which lasted just 47 seconds, the manager allegedly told him the company could not employ someone who might not regularly show up for work. The worker requested five minutes to compose himself and start working, but the request was denied. He was informed he had been dismissed. He claims he has never received a written notice ending his employment relationship. The case takes on added weight because the worker was completely open about his mental health during the job interview. He explained that he can become extremely anxious in new and unfamiliar situations and sometimes needs a few moments to settle down. According to him, the manager showed great understanding and assured him this would not be a problem. This promise, he says, evaporated on the very first day. He considers the dismissal not only unfair but also an act of discrimination based on his mental health condition. The case is now under investigation by the Swedish Equality Ombudsman, which will examine all circumstances. This incident highlights broader concerns about workers' rights and employers' obligations regarding mental health. Reports indicate that roughly one in six individuals experiences mental health issues during their working lives. Although 81 percent of companies increased focus on employee well-being after the pandemic, nearly a third of workers still feel support in their environment is inadequate. Similar cases have emerged globally. In the United States, Kevin Berling was dismissed in 2019 after experiencing a panic attack due to a company organizing a birthday party despite his explicit request not to do so because of his anxiety disorder. A court ruled in his favor in 2022, awarding him $450,000 in damages for emotional distress and lost wages, concluding he suffered a harmful workplace action due to his disability. In Croatia, the Labor Law protects employees against unjust dismissals. Employers must have valid reasons for terminating a labor contract, and discrimination based on health status is strictly prohibited. While the law allows for “personally conditioned dismissal” if an employee, due to permanent characteristics or abilities, cannot properly perform their duties, such dismissal must not result from discriminatory motives. Globally, awareness of the importance of mental health continues to grow, with more companies recognizing that investing in employee well-being is not only ethically correct but also economically beneficial. It is estimated that each dollar invested in treating depression and anxiety yields four times its value through improved health and productivity among workers.

How each side covered it

The same event, grouped by the political lean of the outlets covering it.

How each side covered it

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and your personalized For You feed.

Become a Supporter

Covered around the world

The same event as reported in other countries.

Covered around the world

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and your personalized For You feed.

Become a Supporter

Claims check

Key factual claims, and how many sources assert vs dispute each.

Claims check

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and your personalized For You feed.

Become a Supporter

Go to the primary sources (2)

The official sources this coverage is built on. Read them directly to bypass framing.

1 reports

Net.hr logoNet.hrIndependentProgressiveFactual 75Objective 70yesterday
First day on the job, he got fired over a 47-second phone call.

Jedan zdravstveni djelatnik u Švedskoj tvrdi da je dobio otkaz tek prvog dana na poslu, tijekom telefonskog razgovora koji je trajao 47 sekundi. Incident se desio 23. srpnja u ustanovi za njegu starijih osoba u okolici Stockholma. Radnik je stigao ranije kako bi se presuo u uniformu, ali nije pronašao svlačionicu. Kada je tražio pomoć kolega, bili su ignorirani. Tijekom početka smjene, osjećaj izgubljenosti i pritisak su doveli do napada panike. Poslao je poruku nadređenom, ali umjesto razumijevanja dobio je otkaz. Tvrdi da je otkaz nepravedan i čin diskriminacije na temelju mentalnog zdravlja. Slučaj je prijavljen švedskom pučkom pravobranitelju za ravnopravnost. Incident podcrtava šire probleme oko prava radnika i podrške u slučajevima mentalnog zdravlja.

Bias read (Progressive): Artikl naglašava nepravdu i diskriminaciju na temelju mentalnog zdravlja, što se smatra pravno relevantnim pitanjem. Fokus je na prava radnika i potrebu za podrškom, što se često povezuje s levičarskim perspektivama. Iako nema jasno izraženog političkog stajališta, ton i okvir priča sugeriraju podrš

Why factuality (75): The article provides specific details about the incident, including the date (23. srpnja), location (near Stockholm), and the duration of the phone call (47 seconds). However, these details are not supported by the primary source document, which does not mention this specific case or any similar eve

Why objectivity (70): The article uses emotionally charged language such as 'napadaj panike', 'ignorirali', and 'dugim 47 sekundi' to describe the situation, which may influence reader perception. It also presents the worker's account as factual without providing counterpoints or evidence from the employer's perspective.

Keep the news honest.

ObjectiveNews is reader-funded and ad-free — we show you the bias instead of hiding it. Support independent journalism for €5/month.

Become a Supporter

Related stories