ON
← Back to feed
Project Panama: How Anthropic secretly destroyed millions of books to train its artificial intelligence
World🏛️ PoliticsProgressiveyesterday

Project Panama: How Anthropic secretly destroyed millions of books to train its artificial intelligence

Sudski dokumenti otkrivaju da je AI kompanija Anthropic tajno kupila i fizički uništila stotine tisuća knjiga kako bi ih skenirala i koristila za treniranje svog chatbota Claude. Ova operacija, unutarnje nazvana 'Projekt Panama', uključivala je industrijsku destrukciju knjiga, njihovo skeniranje i daljnji proces reciklaže. Dokumenti su objavljeni u okviru sudskog postupka protiv Anthropic, a priču je prvi objavio The Washington Post. Prema internim dokumentima, kompanija smatra da internet nije dovoljno kvalitetan izvor za razvoj napredne AI, te je tražila profesionalno pisane knjige za poboljšanje stila pisanja chatbota. Također su otkrivene upotrebe piratskih knjiga preko baze LibGen, što ukazuje na dodatne pravne rizike.

Anthropic, the American artificial intelligence company, has been revealed to have secretly destroyed hundreds of thousands of books to train its chatbot Claude. According to newly released court documents, the firm purchased large quantities of books, physically destroyed them, scanned their content, and used the data to improve its AI models. After digitization, the books were sent to recycling facilities where the paper was repurposed into cardboard packaging, paper products, and even toilet paper. The process described in the documents sounds almost like a scene from a dystopian novel. In massive warehouses, industrial machines cut through book spines, pages were separated one by one, and the contents were rapidly scanned. Within seconds, the material ended up in training databases for artificial intelligence. What remained of the books was nearly nothing, paper was sent to recycling plants where it was transformed into new materials. This operation, internally known as “Project Panama,” aimed to “destructively scan all books in the world.” One document states explicitly, “We don’t want the public to know we’re doing this.” The documents emerged during a lawsuit against Anthropic, initially reported by The Washington Post. They reveal a covert strategy to bypass traditional data sources and create more sophisticated AI models. Anthropic’s leadership concluded that the internet alone was insufficient for developing advanced AI. They wanted Claude to learn from professionally written books to develop a better writing style rather than relying on what they called “low-quality internet language.” Another reason cited was the growing issue of “AI model collapse”, a phenomenon where AI systems increasingly learn from content generated by other AIs, leading to a decline in quality over time. To achieve these goals, Anthropic sourced tens of thousands of books from multiple suppliers, including Better World Books and World of Books in the UK. External contractors handled the physical destruction and scanning. These contractors used machinery to remove book spines, separate pages, and quickly digitize the content. One partner noted that Anthropic planned to process between 500,000 and two million books within six months. The documents also expose the use of pirated books. The largest challenge for the company wasn't just destroying legally acquired books. Court filings show that co-founder Ben Mann had already downloaded copyrighted books via the pirate database LibGen in 2021. Evidence includes a video screenshot showing his computer screen during the download. A year later, he shared a link to Pirate Library Mirror, a vast collection of illegally distributed books, with a message: “Just in time!!!” In response to a collective lawsuit filed by authors who claimed Anthropic had used their works without permission to train its model, the company agreed to pay $1.5 billion in damages. This would cover approximately 500,000 copyrighted works. Attorney Justin Nelson of the authors' legal team stated this was the largest known copyright infringement settlement in history. However, the legal battle is far from over. Similar lawsuits are currently underway against Meta, OpenAI, Google, and Microsoft, alleging unauthorized use of protected works in AI development. A previous ruling by an American court suggested that using legally purchased books for AI training could qualify as permissible under U.S. law. However, this does not apply to millions of books obtained through illegal means, according to the plaintiffs. Anthropic maintains that the settlement did not change this part of the ruling and insists the dispute was solely about how certain materials were obtained, not the use of books themselves for AI training.

Go to the primary sources (1)

The official sources this coverage is built on. Read them directly to bypass framing.

1 reports

N1 Hrvatska logoN1 HrvatskaIndependentProgressiveFactual 85Objective 75yesterday
Project Panama: How Anthropic secretly destroyed millions of books to train its artificial intelligence

Sudski dokumenti otkrivaju da je AI kompanija Anthropic tajno kupila i fizički uništila stotine tisuća knjiga kako bi ih skenirala i koristila za treniranje svog chatbota Claude. Ova operacija, unutarnje nazvana 'Projekt Panama', uključivala je industrijsku destrukciju knjiga, njihovo skeniranje i daljnji proces reciklaže. Dokumenti su objavljeni u okviru sudskog postupka protiv Anthropic, a priču je prvi objavio The Washington Post. Prema internim dokumentima, kompanija smatra da internet nije dovoljno kvalitetan izvor za razvoj napredne AI, te je tražila profesionalno pisane knjige za poboljšanje stila pisanja chatbota. Također su otkrivene upotrebe piratskih knjiga preko baze LibGen, što ukazuje na dodatne pravne rizike.

Bias read (Progressive): Artikel framira aktivnosti Anthropic kao etički i pravni problem, naglašava tajnost i nepravilnu upotrebu knjiga, te ističe pravne posljedice. Iako se ne direktno ocjenjuje političku poziciju kompanije, ton i okvir priče sugeriraju kritiku tehnološkog kapitalizma i poticanje regulativnih mjera, što

Why factuality (85): The article accurately reports on Project Panama based on the primary source document, detailing the destruction and digitization of books by Anthropic. It mentions the use of third-party vendors, the scale of operations, and the legal implications. However, it omits specific details such as the exa

Why objectivity (75): The tone is somewhat sensational, referring to the situation as 'distopian' and emphasizing the negative aspects. While it presents facts neutrally, it uses emotionally charged language like 'potajno uništio milijune knjiga' which adds a dramatic element.

How each side covered it

The same event, grouped by the political lean of the outlets covering it.

How each side covered it

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Covered around the world

The same event as reported in other countries.

Covered around the world

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Claims check

Key factual claims, and how many sources assert vs dispute each.

Claims check

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Keep the news honest.

ObjectiveNews is reader-funded and ad-free — we show you the bias instead of hiding it. Support independent journalism for €4/month.

Become a Supporter

Related stories