On Thursday afternoon, a traffic accident occurred on Savska Street in Zagreb involving two vehicles from the security convoy of Prime Minister Andrej Plenković. The incident took place near the Museum of Modern Art, shortly after the convoy returned from a government meeting held at the National and University Library. According to eyewitness accounts, one vehicle collided with another, causing damage and triggering airbags, which led to smoke spreading inside one of the cars. Both vehicles were part of the prime minister's protective detail, with Plenković himself reportedly present in one of them alongside Zvonimir Frka-Petešić, head of the Office of the Prime Minister.
The collision has sparked discussions about the safety and efficiency of the new traffic infrastructure recently installed along Savska Street. Following the incident, Plenković made remarks about the situation, describing the impact between the two vehicles as minimal. He also commented on the newly introduced traffic signals and barriers in the area, calling them a "brilliant innovation." His comments came just a day after the accident, suggesting that he viewed the incident as a minor occurrence rather than a significant issue.
According to reports, the accident occurred around noon when the convoy was returning from the government session. While the exact cause of the collision remains under investigation, some experts have offered insights into possible contributing factors. Professor Marko Ševrović from the Faculty of Traffic Sciences at the University of Zagreb stated that based on available photographs, the most likely cause of the accident was an unexpected braking maneuver combined with insufficient distance between the vehicles and inadequate reaction time from the driver of the second car. He emphasized that the yellow traffic lanes and new barriers on Savska Street were not decisive factors in the incident, noting that the entire street operates under similar conditions and that drivers should not have been surprised by the situation.
Ševrović further explained that while speed might not have been excessively high, the combination of speed and insufficient spacing played a critical role in the collision. He highlighted the importance of both reaction time and distance in such scenarios. Additionally, he noted that the movement of protected convoys depends on specific circumstances, and in urgent situations, there is a legal basis for different traffic regimes decided upon by police and security services. Vehicles in a protected convoy are allowed to use yellow lanes under special traffic regulations.
Minister of Internal Affairs Davor Božinović confirmed that only vehicles from the prime minister’s protection detail were involved in the accident, and no one suffered injuries. He stated that the cause of the accident would be determined through an official investigation. Despite the incident, Plenković continued with his scheduled duties without interruption.
As the investigation proceeds, attention will focus on whether the new traffic measures on Savska Street had any influence on the incident. Experts suggest that while the infrastructure itself may not have contributed directly to the accident, its presence highlights ongoing efforts to improve road safety in the city. Meanwhile, the incident serves as a reminder of the complexities involved in managing high-profile security convoys in urban environments where traffic conditions can quickly become unpredictable.
2 reports
Telegram.hrIndependentCenterFactual 95Objective 85yesterday Profesor o sudaru auta iz Plenkovićeve kolone: ‘Nisu krivi stupići u Savskoj. Ključni su brzina i razmak…’A traffic accident involving two vehicles from Prime Minister Andrej Plenković's motorcade on Savska Street was analyzed by Professor Marko Ševrović from the Faculty of Traffic Sciences at the University of Zagreb. According to Ševrović, based on available photos, the most likely cause was an unexpected braking, insufficient distance between the vehicles, and inadequate reaction time by the driver. He emphasized that the yellow lanes and new barriers on Savska were not decisive factors, as the entire road operates under this regime. The professor noted that speed was probably not excessive but that the combination of speed and insufficient spacing led to the collision. He explained that the movement of protected individuals' convoys depends on circumstances, and in urgent situations, there is a legal basis for different driving regimes decided by police and security services. Minister of Internal Affairs Davor Božinović confirmed that only vehicles from the prime minister's entourage were involved, no one was injured, and the cause would be determined by evidence. Plenković continued his duties as scheduled after the incident.
Bias read (Center): The article presents an objective analysis of a traffic accident involving the prime minister's motorcade, focusing on technical causes such as braking, distance, and reaction time. It includes expert opinion and official statements without apparent ideological framing or biased language. The focus,
Why these scores (Factual 95 · Objective 85): High factuality as it directly quotes Professor Ševrović and aligns with the primary source. Objectivity is good but slightly lower due to emphasis on the professor's opinion rather than presenting multiple perspectives.
N1 HrvatskaIndependentCenterFactual 85Objective 7013 hr. ago Plenkovic on the crash and the "brilliant innovation": We just touchedPrime Minister Andrej Plenković commented on a minor traffic collision involving two vehicles from his motorcade in Zagreb. The incident occurred on Savska Street near the Museum of Modern Art, shortly after a government meeting at the National and University Library. Plenković downplayed the accident, calling it a simple 'touching' of the vehicles, and humorously praised the new traffic signals installed on Savska Street as a 'brilliant innovation.' Witnesses reported that smoke began spreading from one of the cars, likely due to airbags deploying. The incident has sparked some discussion about road safety and infrastructure.
Bias read (Center): The article presents a neutral account of the event, quoting Prime Minister Plenković directly and including witness accounts. There is no overtly biased language or selective sourcing. The framing remains balanced, focusing on the factual sequence of events and direct quotes from involved parties.
Why these scores (Factual 85 · Objective 70): Factuality is high as it accurately reports the incident involving Plenković and mentions the new traffic lights. Objectivity is lower due to the use of emotive language like 'briljantna inovacija' and the focus on Plenković’s reaction over the technical analysis.
★
Keep the news honest.
ObjectiveNews is reader-funded and ad-free — we show you the bias instead of hiding it. Support independent journalism for €5/month.
Become a Supporter