ON
← Back to feed
Prince Harry and famous faces pay £9.5m to Daily Mail publisher after failed court case
United Kingdom🏛️ PoliticsCenter7 hr. ago

Prince Harry and famous faces pay £9.5m to Daily Mail publisher after failed court case

Prince Harry and a group of seven high-profile individuals, including Baroness Doreen Lawrence, Sir Elton John, and Elizabeth Hurley, have agreed to pay £9.5 million in legal costs to Associated Newspapers Limited (ANL), the publisher of the Daily Mail. The settlement comes after a protracted 11-week High Court trial where the group claimed ANL engaged in unlawful information gathering. The court dismissed their claims, finding them speculative and unsubstantiated. On 21 August, Judge Mr Justice Nicklin ordered the group to contribute £9.544,355 towards ANL's costs, citing the 'unjustifiably wide canvas' of their litigation and the 'public presentation of allegations of serious criminality and impropriety' that were not proven. The judge criticized the group's persistent pursuit of unfounded claims and the lawyers' actions in putting unpleaded allegations to witnesses. ANL described the ruling as a 'devastating critique' of attempts to damage the newspaper and its staff.

1 reports

The Independent logoThe IndependentIndependentCenter7 hr. ago
Prince Harry and famous faces pay £9.5m to Daily Mail publisher after failed court case

Prince Harry and a group of seven high-profile individuals, including Baroness Doreen Lawrence, Sir Elton John, and Elizabeth Hurley, have agreed to pay £9.5 million in legal costs to Associated Newspapers Limited (ANL), the publisher of the Daily Mail. The settlement comes after a protracted 11-week High Court trial where the group claimed ANL engaged in unlawful information gathering. The court dismissed their claims, finding them speculative and unsubstantiated. On 21 August, Judge Mr Justice Nicklin ordered the group to contribute £9.544,355 towards ANL's costs, citing the 'unjustifiably wide canvas' of their litigation and the 'public presentation of allegations of serious criminality and impropriety' that were not proven. The judge criticized the group's persistent pursuit of unfounded claims and the lawyers' actions in putting unpleaded allegations to witnesses. ANL described the ruling as a 'devastating critique' of attempts to damage the newspaper and its staff.

Bias read (Center): While the subject involves high-profile individuals and legal proceedings, the article presents the court's findings and rulings objectively, without overtly favoring either side. The framing emphasizes the judicial outcome rather than taking a partisan stance. The language remains neutral, focusing

How each side covered it

The same event, grouped by the political lean of the outlets covering it.

How each side covered it

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Covered around the world

The same event as reported in other countries.

Covered around the world

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Claims check

Key factual claims, and how many sources assert vs dispute each.

Claims check

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Keep the news honest.

ObjectiveNews is reader-funded and ad-free — we show you the bias instead of hiding it. Support independent journalism for €4/month.

Become a Supporter

Related stories