ON
← Back to feed
Drug use: why is there no safe room in Ljubljana?
Slovenia🏛️ PoliticsCenter9/6/2026

Drug use: why is there no safe room in Ljubljana?

The article discusses the issue of drug use in Ljubljana, highlighting the lack of safe spaces for users and the worsening conditions despite ongoing challenges. It contrasts historical approaches to drug prohibition with modern perspectives, emphasizing the social and health implications of drug addiction. The piece notes that while other European cities like Frankfurt have implemented open-use areas with controlled environments, Ljubljana lacks such measures. Local residents report increasing concerns over drug-related issues, including illegal trade, user exploitation, and public disturbances. The article criticizes the current municipal authorities for failing to establish comprehensive programs to address these problems, suggesting that without intervention, the situation will continue to deteriorate.

A security guard has come forward with allegations that young women in Ljubljana are frequently seeking protection from migrants, accusing them of sexual harassment and assault. The anonymous guard described multiple incidents in which he had to intervene to shield minors and other individuals from alleged predatory behavior by migrants, particularly from North Africa and the Middle East. His account, shared through online platforms and social media, highlights growing concerns over safety in a city increasingly shaped by multiculturalism. The security guard, who wished to remain unnamed, detailed several instances during his work in private security where young girls approached him for help after being harassed or threatened by migrants. He recounted how, within a single month, he encountered approximately eight such cases, often assisting the victims back to their homes or public transport. In one instance, a girl around 17 or 18 years old grabbed his hand while recognizing his uniform and asked for assistance, claiming she was being followed by a migrant. After escorting her home, he noticed the migrant following them but fled upon realizing the girl was no longer alone. According to the guard’s statements, these incidents have become more frequent, prompting serious questions about the safety of residents in Ljubljana. He emphasized that the experiences he describes are not isolated but part of a broader pattern he encounters regularly in his line of work. His account underscores the need for greater awareness and action regarding the risks faced by vulnerable groups in urban areas. The guard also raised concerns about the functionality of surveillance systems in key locations such as bus stations and shopping centers. He claimed that video recordings were no longer being stored, despite cameras continuing to operate in real-time. This lack of recorded footage, he argued, leaves authorities unable to review past incidents, potentially undermining efforts to address ongoing issues of safety and security. The situation, according to the guard, reflects a decision that appears increasingly questionable given the rising number of reported incidents. The security guard's revelations have sparked further scrutiny into the conditions under which migrants live in Slovenia, particularly those residing in asylum centers or other accommodations. While mainstream media often avoids discussing the realities of migration, online platforms continue to provide new and alarming details. Earlier reports highlighted disturbing activities at Metelkova in Ljubljana, where groups from North Africa allegedly lure young people with promises of financial gain or other incentives. The guard’s testimony adds weight to existing concerns about the integration of migrants and the challenges faced by local communities. His account suggests that the presence of certain migrant groups may contribute to an environment where vulnerable individuals feel unsafe, necessitating urgent attention from both local authorities and the public. The security guard’s claims have yet to be independently verified, and no official response has been made public. However, his statements reflect a growing unease among some segments of the population regarding the impact of migration on personal safety and community cohesion. As discussions around this issue continue, the need for comprehensive policies addressing both the rights of migrants and the well-being of local residents becomes ever more pressing.

How this report was made. Objective News wrote this report from 2 source articles, using AI-assisted synthesis under our methodology. It is our own text, not a copy of any single outlet. Read our methodology.

Responsible editor: Matej BašaSpotted an error? Report it

2 reports

Domovina logoDomovinaIndependentProgressiveFactual 85Objective 709/6/2026
Drug use: why is there no safe room in Ljubljana?

The article discusses the issue of drug use in Ljubljana, highlighting the lack of safe spaces for users and the worsening conditions despite ongoing challenges. It contrasts historical approaches to drug prohibition with modern perspectives, emphasizing the social and health implications of drug addiction. The piece notes that while other European cities like Frankfurt have implemented open-use areas with controlled environments, Ljubljana lacks such measures. Local residents report increasing concerns over drug-related issues, including illegal trade, user exploitation, and public disturbances. The article criticizes the current municipal authorities for failing to establish comprehensive programs to address these problems, suggesting that without intervention, the situation will continue to deteriorate.

Bias read (Progressive): The article frames the issue of drug use as a systemic failure of local governance, implying that the current administration is neglecting public welfare. It emphasizes the need for structured, multidisciplinary solutions, which aligns with progressive policies advocating for harm reduction and decr

Why factuality (85): The article discusses the social phenomenon of drug use in Ljubljana, referencing historical approaches by governments and comparing situations in Germany and the Netherlands. It provides general information about drug use as a societal issue but lacks specific data or statistics on current rates, l

Why objectivity (70): The tone leans towards a critical view of society's treatment of drug users, suggesting they are marginalized. While it presents different perspectives (historical vs. modern), it frames the issue through a somewhat sympathetic lens toward users and a critical stance toward societal judgment, introd

Nova24TV logoNova24TVParty-alignedConservativeFactual 65Objective 359/2/2026
Witness the security guard: Many minors seek protection from migrants

An anonymous security officer reports on incidents involving young girls being harassed by migrants in Ljubljana, alleging that these migrants, primarily from the Middle East and Africa, engage in sexual harassment and predatory behavior. The officer describes multiple instances where he had to protect young women, adults, and elderly individuals from perceived threats. He also highlights concerns over the disabling of video surveillance systems at key locations, which could hinder investigations into such incidents. The report was shared through social media and has sparked discussions about safety and the impact of migration on urban areas.

Bias read (Conservative): The article frames the issue of migrant-related harassment as a growing threat to public safety, particularly targeting vulnerable groups like young women. It emphasizes the role of 'predators' among migrants and criticizes the lack of accountability and oversight, suggesting a right-leaning concern

Why factuality (65): The article reports on claims made by an anonymous security officer regarding incidents involving young girls being harassed by migrants in Ljubljana. While there is no primary source document to verify these specific allegations, the article aligns with broader narratives found in similar media out

Why objectivity (35): The tone of the article is highly charged and emotionally driven, using terms like 'predators' and 'migrants' in a way that implies criminal intent. It presents only one-sided accounts and frames the issue as a crisis caused by migrants, without offering counterpoints or alternative perspectives. Th

How each side covered it

The same event, grouped by the political lean of the outlets covering it.

How each side covered it

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Covered around the world

The same event as reported in other countries.

Covered around the world

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Claims check

Key factual claims, and how many sources assert vs dispute each.

Claims check

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Keep the news honest.

ObjectiveNews is reader-funded and ad-free — we show you the bias instead of hiding it. Support independent journalism for €4/month.

Become a Supporter

Related stories