ON
← Back to feed
(VIDEO) Video released of the accident in which President Natasha Pirc Musar was injured
Slovenia🏛️ PoliticsCenter9/1/2026

(VIDEO) Video released of the accident in which President Natasha Pirc Musar was injured

On July 31, 2026, a traffic accident occurred on the coastal motorway near Kastelec involving a convoy of vehicles protecting President Nataša Pirc Musar. The president broke her leg, and her friend was also injured in the collision. The incident took place during a trip to a event celebrating multiple Slovenian Tour de France winners. The convoy consisted of three vehicles, with two of them involved in a crash. A Mercedes combi carrying the president collided with a police vehicle containing her bodyguards. Experts analyzed the footage and noted that the driver of the first vehicle on the left lane braked abruptly while the second vehicle barely moved to the right. A mobility expert explained that drivers of protected individuals are allowed to drive at higher speeds with shorter safety distances. He also stated that injuries would have been less severe if everyone had been properly secured. The cause of the accident is under investigation by a specialized state prosecutor’s office.

A traffic collision involving the convoy of Slovenia's president, Nataša Pirc Musar, occurred on July 31 on the coastal motorway near the Kastelec tunnel. The incident resulted in injuries to the president and her companion, who were traveling in one of the vehicles. According to reports, the collision happened when the lead vehicle in the convoy began braking suddenly, causing the following vehicle to attempt evasive action. However, the maneuver was insufficient, leading to a crash with the police vehicle accompanying the presidential convoy. The accident took place during a trip to Komenda, where the president was attending an event related to multiple Slovenian winners of the Tour de France race. Due to heavy traffic on the weekend, the security team opted for a three-car convoy to ensure the president’s safety. Two of the three vehicles involved in the incident were part of this convoy. The middle vehicle, a Mercedes van carrying the president, collided from behind with the police car. A third support vehicle followed the president’s vehicle. According to Dr. Peter Vidmar, dean of the Faculty of Maritime Studies and Transport, the collision appears to have been caused by the activation of safety signals in the tunnel, prompting the vehicles in the convoy to slow down. He explained that the distance between the first vehicle in the convoy and the van was approximately 30 to 35 meters at a speed of around 150 kilometers per hour, which he described as slightly insufficient given the high speed. Vidmar noted that even highly trained drivers have a reaction time ranging from half a second to one second, which is not enough to stop or significantly reduce speed at such a high velocity. He emphasized that the situation created by the positioning of the vehicles made the accident unavoidable. He also acknowledged the tragic nature of the incident, highlighting the psychological burden it carries for all involved. The video footage released by the creators of the show "Tarča" on TV Slovenija shows the moment of the collision. In the footage, the president's vehicle can be seen colliding with the police vehicle. The president suffered a broken collarbone, while her friend, who was traveling with her, also sustained injuries. The president expressed regret that she was not wearing a seatbelt at the time of the accident. Andrej Brglez, a mobility expert and former driver for protected individuals, analyzed the footage and stated that the collision occurred when the first vehicle on the left lane started braking, and the second vehicle barely managed to move to the right. He noted that the driver likely believed they could successfully move to the right lane, similar to the vehicle behind them. Brglez added that drivers of protected individuals are allowed to drive at higher speeds and with shorter safety distances due to their training. He suggested that the injuries might have been less severe if everyone had been buckled up. The investigation into the causes of the accident is being handled by a specialized unit within the state prosecution. The incident has raised questions about the safety protocols and procedures followed by the presidential security detail, particularly regarding the choice of speed and safety distances in high-speed environments. The case will likely involve a thorough review of the convoy's operational guidelines and the decision-making process that led to the selection of a three-vehicle convoy under heavy traffic conditions.

How this report was made. Objective News wrote this report from 2 source articles, using AI-assisted synthesis under our methodology. It is our own text, not a copy of any single outlet. Read our methodology.

Responsible editor: Matej BašaSpotted an error? Report it

2 reports

Večer logoVečerIndependent🔒CenterFactual 85Objective 709/1/2026
(VIDEO) Video released of the accident in which President Natasha Pirc Musar was injured

On July 31, 2026, a traffic accident occurred on the coastal motorway near Kastelec involving a convoy of vehicles protecting President Nataša Pirc Musar. The president broke her leg, and her friend was also injured in the collision. The incident took place during a trip to a event celebrating multiple Slovenian Tour de France winners. The convoy consisted of three vehicles, with two of them involved in a crash. A Mercedes combi carrying the president collided with a police vehicle containing her bodyguards. Experts analyzed the footage and noted that the driver of the first vehicle on the left lane braked abruptly while the second vehicle barely moved to the right. A mobility expert explained that drivers of protected individuals are allowed to drive at higher speeds with shorter safety distances. He also stated that injuries would have been less severe if everyone had been properly secured. The cause of the accident is under investigation by a specialized state prosecutor’s office.

Bias read (Center): The article presents a factual report on a traffic accident involving a high-profile individual without overtly criticizing or praising any political figures. It includes expert analysis but remains neutral in tone, focusing on the technical aspects of the incident rather than taking a political立场.

Why factuality (85): This article provides clear factual details about the accident, including the identities involved, the location, and the circumstances. It references a video and includes statements from experts like Andrej Brglez, which adds credibility. The information is consistent with what is known from other r

Why objectivity (70): While the article presents the event in a straightforward manner, there is a slight emotional undertone when describing the aftermath and the victim's reaction. However, it remains largely factual and avoids overt bias, maintaining a reasonable level of neutrality.

24ur (POP TV) logo24ur (POP TV)IndependentCenterFactual 75Objective 609/1/2026
'At 90 miles an hour, 100 feet was a little short'

An incident involving a convoy of vehicles traveling at high speed resulted in a collision due to insufficient safety distance between the lead vehicle and the following truck. Dr. Peter Vidmar, dean of the Faculty of Maritime and Transport Studies, explained during the 24UR Zvečer program that the convoy’s vehicles were traveling at approximately 150 km/h, with a safety gap of around 30–35 meters, which was deemed too short for such speeds. He noted that even experienced drivers cannot react quickly enough to reduce speed in time to avoid collisions at these speeds. The accident occurred because the first vehicle in the convoy could not move out of the way, forcing the second vehicle to adjust, but the lack of space led to the crash. Vidmar emphasized that while the situation was tragic, the positioning of the vehicles made the accident unavoidable under the circumstances.

Bias read (Center): The article provides a factual account of a traffic incident, quoting an academic expert without overtly favoring any side. It focuses on technical aspects like driving speed and safety distances rather than making political judgments or advocating for specific policies.

Why factuality (75): The article provides a detailed account of the incident based on an interview with Dr. Peter Vidmar, who explains the sequence of events, speed estimates, and safety distances. It aligns with the general understanding of the event from other sources, though specific details like exact speeds and dis

Why objectivity (60): The tone is somewhat informative but leans towards explaining the consequences and implications of the event. There is some emphasis on the tragic nature of the accident and the psychological impact, which may reflect a more empathetic or narrative approach rather than strictly objective reporting.

How each side covered it

The same event, grouped by the political lean of the outlets covering it.

How each side covered it

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Covered around the world

The same event as reported in other countries.

Covered around the world

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Claims check

Key factual claims, and how many sources assert vs dispute each.

Claims check

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Keep the news honest.

ObjectiveNews is reader-funded and ad-free — we show you the bias instead of hiding it. Support independent journalism for €4/month.

Become a Supporter

Related stories