ON
← Back to feed
Presidency explains what happened at the inauguration event of Tolu Airport: That was the activity that was planned
CO🏛️ PoliticsCenter16 days ago

Presidency explains what happened at the inauguration event of Tolu Airport: That was the activity that was planned

The Colombian presidency, through its spokesperson Andrés Hernández, explained the controversy surrounding President Gustavo Petro’s arrival at the inauguration event of the Tolú Airport. Petro arrived by presidential plane but did not disembark, leading to public confusion and criticism. The spokesperson clarified that the planned activity was solely the landing and takeoff of the presidential aircraft, which was part of the formal opening ceremony. He emphasized that there were no additional activities scheduled, including Petro meeting the press or participating on the tarmac. The prolonged stay of the plane on the runway raised questions about the event’s purpose and transparency, prompting social media reactions and skepticism about the inauguration’s significance.

President Gustavo Petro did not inaugurate the Tolú Airport, marking another failure in his administration’s promise to open the Golfo de Morrosquillo airport. The project, once hailed as one of the government’s most ambitious infrastructure initiatives for the Caribbean region, has again fallen behind schedule, raising concerns among local officials, business leaders, and oversight bodies. According to the Aerocivil, the airport’s construction is currently at 84.75 percent completion, far below the official target set for its opening date. The planned inauguration was scheduled for July 31, with President Petro expected to land at the new terminal during a visit to Santiago de Tolú. However, the presidential visit was canceled hours before the scheduled arrival, leaving the airport still under construction and unable to begin operations. The cancellation came after the city council had already issued special decrees to prepare for the visit, including traffic restrictions, drone bans, and heightened security measures. These preparations were abruptly halted, underscoring the lack of progress on the project. The delay was anticipated by many who have been following the project closely. Earlier this year, reports indicated that the timeline proposed by the Aerocivil was unlikely to be met due to ongoing archaeological findings and other logistical challenges. The Institute of Colombian Anthropology and History (ICANH) required extensive monitoring of certain areas, which slowed down construction efforts. These procedures lacked a definitive end date, as they depended on excavation results and technical guidelines from ICANH. Additionally, there were concerns over the availability of funds needed to complete essential works for the airport’s full operation. During the May 27 announcement in Sincelejo, President Petro and Aerocivil Director Luis Alfonso Martínez Chimenty assured the public that the airport would be ready by July 31. Despite acknowledging delays caused by archaeological discoveries, they maintained confidence in meeting the deadline. However, as the date approached, reality proved otherwise. The city of Santiago de Tolú even went ahead with administrative steps to facilitate the visit, further highlighting the growing skepticism surrounding the project’s viability. In response to the controversy, Andrés Hernández, head of press for the Presidency of the Republic, clarified that the event was strictly a ceremonial landing and takeoff of the presidential plane. He stated that no additional activities beyond this were planned, contradicting claims that the president had changed his mind or made last-minute decisions. According to Hernández, the purpose of the visit was solely to demonstrate the functionality of the runway, with no intention of the president stepping off the aircraft. This explanation aimed to dispel speculation about the nature of the event and the reasons behind the absence of the president on the ground. The situation sparked widespread discussion online, with many questioning the significance of the visit and whether the inauguration truly took place. The prolonged stay of the presidential plane on the runway, 20 minutes after landing, only added to the confusion. While the government insists that the ceremony was completed as planned, critics argue that the lack of visible engagement from the president undermines the symbolic importance of the event. As the airport remains unfinished, the incident highlights broader issues of delayed infrastructure projects and the challenges of delivering on political promises.

3 reports

El Tiempo logoEl TiempoIndependentCenterFactual 95Objective 7521 days ago
Petro did not inaugurate the airport of Tolu: the promise to open the Gulf of Morrosquillo was again breached and questions grow

The article reports that President Gustavo Petro did not inaugurate the new airport in Tolú, known as the Golfo de Morrosquillo, despite prior promises. The project, which was presented as a major infrastructure initiative for the Caribbean region, has faced delays and remains incomplete, with only 84.75% of construction completed according to the Aeronáutica Civil. The planned presidential visit was canceled hours before it was set to take place, and local authorities had implemented special measures to prepare for it. Experts, businesses, and oversight organizations have raised concerns about the project’s progress over several months. The article notes that these issues were anticipated by EL TIEMPO, which previously highlighted challenges with the timeline.

Bias read (Center): The article presents a factual account of delayed infrastructure projects and government commitments without overtly criticizing or praising either side. It highlights both the administration’s promises and the resulting failures, while maintaining a balanced tone. There is no clear ideological slan

Why factuality (95): The article accurately reports that the airport was not inaugurated by President Petro, citing the cancellation of the visit and the incomplete construction progress of 84.75%. It references statements from Aerocivil and aligns with the broader narrative of delays and unmet promises. The details are

Why objectivity (75): The article uses somewhat critical language such as 'nuevo capítulo de retrasos' and 'promesas incumplidas,' which may imply judgment rather than neutrality. However, it presents facts without overt bias, though the tone leans slightly toward skepticism.

Semana logoSemanaIndependentCenterFactual 80Objective 8521 days ago
Presidency explains what happened at the inauguration event of Tolu Airport: That was the activity that was planned

The Colombian presidency, through its spokesperson Andrés Hernández, explained the controversy surrounding President Gustavo Petro’s arrival at the inauguration event of the Tolú Airport. Petro arrived by presidential plane but did not disembark, leading to public confusion and criticism. The spokesperson clarified that the planned activity was solely the landing and takeoff of the presidential aircraft, which was part of the formal opening ceremony. He emphasized that there were no additional activities scheduled, including Petro meeting the press or participating on the tarmac. The prolonged stay of the plane on the runway raised questions about the event’s purpose and transparency, prompting social media reactions and skepticism about the inauguration’s significance.

Bias read (Center): The article presents the official explanation from the presidency without overtly criticizing or praising the decision. It reports both the public reaction and the administration’s defense neutrally, without leaning toward either political side. The framing remains balanced between the controversy (

Why factuality (80): The article discusses the inauguration of the airport in Tolú and related controversies. It does not mention Gianni Infantino or the FIFA-related events described in the primary source document. The facts presented are specific to the airport event and do not conflict with the primary source.

Why objectivity (85): The article maintains a neutral tone, presenting the situation from the perspective of the administration while acknowledging criticism. It avoids strong editorializing or emotional language.

El Espectador logoEl EspectadorIndependentCenterFactual 60Objective 5516 days ago
Gustavo Petro addressed the country for the last time as president: this is how the opposition will move

The article reports on President Gustavo Petro's final visit to Colombia as president, focusing on how the opposition plans to respond. It highlights the political tensions and potential challenges facing Petro's administration ahead of future elections. The piece emphasizes the strategic moves by opposition leaders and their expectations for the upcoming political landscape.

Bias read (Center): The article presents a balanced overview of the political situation without overtly favoring any particular side. It focuses on the actions and strategies of the opposition while acknowledging Petro's role as the current president. There is no clear ideological slant in the framing or emphasis.

Why factuality (60): The article is incomplete and only partially informative, focusing on the opposition's movement rather than providing substantial new information. It lacks detailed sourcing and appears to be a truncated version of a longer piece, making it difficult to assess factual accuracy with confidence.

Why objectivity (55): The language is highly subjective, using phrases like 'así se moverá la oposición' which implies a prediction or assessment rather than objective reporting. The tone leans towards political commentary rather than impartial journalism.

How each side covered it

The same event, grouped by the political lean of the outlets covering it.

How each side covered it

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Covered around the world

The same event as reported in other countries.

Covered around the world

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Claims check

Key factual claims, and how many sources assert vs dispute each.

Claims check

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Keep the news honest.

ObjectiveNews is reader-funded and ad-free — we show you the bias instead of hiding it. Support independent journalism for €4/month.

Become a Supporter

Related stories